Jump to content

«Մասնակից:Animarkaryan/Ավազարկղ»–ի խմբագրումների տարբերություն

Վիքիպեդիայից՝ ազատ հանրագիտարանից
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Տող 1. Տող 1.


{{about|a philosophical set of beliefs about the meaning of existence|other uses|Religion (disambiguation)}}
[[Պատկեր:ReligijneSymbole.svg|մինի|աջից|Կրոնական սիմվոլներ]]
{{See also|Philosophy|Culture}}
[[Պատկեր:Red Cross of Christianity.jpg|մինի|աջից|Քրիստոնեություն]]
{{distinguish|Region|Religious denomination}}
{{redirect|Religious|a member of a Catholic [[religious institute]]|Religious (Catholicism)}}
{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}}
{{Photomontage|photo1a=St. Charles's Church, Austria, Vienna - Gold piece high above the altar symbolizing Yahweh.jpg|photo1b=Orazio Gentileschi - Jésus endormi sur la croix.jpg|position=right|photo1c=Taj Mahal in March 2004.jpg|photo2a=Swami Vivekananda-1893-09-signed.jpg|photo2b=Liji.jpg|photo2c=Bodhitree.jpg|photo3a=Entire Tanakh scroll set.png|size=300|photo3b=AhuraMazda-Relief.jpg|photo3c=Om symbol.svg}}
{{Religion by Country}}
{{Spirituality sidebar}}


'''Religion''' is a [[cultural system]] of [[religious behaviour|behaviors]] and practices, [[world view]]s, [[sacred texts]], holy places, ethics, and [[Religious organization|societal organisation]] that relate [[human]]ity to what an anthropologist has called "an order of [[existence]]".<ref name="Geertz, C. 1993 pp.87-125">Geertz, C. (1993) ''Religion as a cultural system''. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, Geertz, Clifford, pp.87-125. Fontana Press.</ref> Different religions may or may not contain various elements, ranging from the "[[Divinity|divine]]",<ref name="James, W. 1902 p. 31">James, W. (1902) [https://archive.org/details/varietiesreligi02jamegoog ''The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature''.] Longmans, Green, and Co. (p. 31)</ref> "sacred things",<ref name="Durkheim, E. 1915">Durkheim, E. (1915) [https://archive.org/details/elementaryformso00durkrich ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life'']. London: George Allen & Unwin.</ref> "[[faith]]",<ref name="Tillich, P. 1957 p.1">Tillich, P. (1957) ''Dynamics of faith''. Harper Perennial; (p.1).</ref> a "supernatural being or supernatural beings"<ref name="vergote"/> or "...some sort of ultimacy and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life."<ref name="Paul James and Peter Mandaville 2010">{{Cite book |last1=James |first1=Paul |last2=Mandaville |first2=Peter |year=2010 |lastauthoramp=yes |title=Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions |url=https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010 |publisher=Sage Publications |location=London}}</ref>
[[Պատկեր:Islam-symbol.gif|մինի|Իսլամ]]
'''Կրոն''', հասարակական գիտակցության ձև, աշխարհայացք է, որը հիմնված է գերբնական ուժերի, աստվածությունների նկատմամբ ունեցած հավատի վրա<ref>{{cite web |url=http://mega.km.ru/ojigov/encyclop.asp?TopicNumber=30587&search=%F0%E5%EB%E8%E3%E8%FF#srch0 |title=Толковый словарь русского языка |author= |work= |deadlink=404 }}</ref>:


Religious practices may include [[ritual]]s, [[sermon]]s, commemoration or veneration (of [[God]] or [[deities]]), [[sacrifice]]s, [[festival]]s, [[Banquet|feasts]], [[trance]]s, [[initiation]]s, [[funeral|funerary services]], [[matrimony|matrimonial services]], [[meditation]], [[prayer]], [[music]], [[art]], [[dance]], [[Community service|public service]], or other aspects of human culture. Religions have [[sacred history|sacred histories]] and [[narrative]]s, which may be preserved in sacred [[Religious text|scriptures]], and [[Religious symbol|symbol]]s and [[holy places]], that aim mostly to give a [[meaning of life|meaning to life]]. Religions may contain [[symbol]]ic stories, which are sometimes said by followers to be true, that have the side purpose of explaining the [[creation myth|origin of life]], the [[religious cosmology|Universe]], and other things. Traditionally, [[faith]], in addition to reason, has been considered a source of [[religious belief]]s.<ref name="iep.utm.edu">Faith and Reason by James Swindal, http://www.iep.utm.edu/faith-re/</ref> There are an estimated 10,000 distinct religions worldwide.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Association |first1=African Studies |last2=Michigan |first2=University of |title=History in Africa |date=2005 |page=119 |edition=Volume 32}}</ref> About 84% of the world's population is affiliated with one of the five largest religions, namely [[Christianity]], [[Islam]], [[Hinduism]], [[Buddhism]] or forms of [[folk religion]].<ref name=EB2012 />
Կրոնը կարելի է սահմանել նաև որպես
*Մարդու և Աստծո միավորման մասին գիտություն (ըստ քրիստոնյա հեղինակ և ճարտասան [[Լակտանտիոս]]ի)<ref name="Религиовединие">[http://www.bibliotekar.ru/religiovedenie/65.htm Раздел IV. Религия как общественный феномен] // Религиоведение: Учебное пособие и Учебный словарь-минимум / Под ред. [[Яблоков, Игорь Николаевич|И. Н. Яблокова]]. — М.: Кн. дом «Университет», 2000. —800 с.</ref>.:
*Կազմակերված երկրպագում վերին կամ գերբնական ուժերին։


With the onset of the [[modernisation]] of and the [[scientific revolution]] in the western world, some aspects of religion have cumulatively been criticized. Though the religiously unaffliated, including [[atheism]] (the rejection of [[belief]] in the existence of [[Deity|deities]]) and [[agnosticism]] (the belief that the truth of certain claims – especially metaphysical and religious claims such as whether God, the divine or the supernatural exist – are unknown and perhaps unknowable), have grown globally, many of the unaffiliated still have various religious beliefs.<ref name="Pew Global Unaffiliated 12/2012">{{cite web |url=http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-unaffiliated.aspx |title=Religiously Unaffiliated |work=The Global Religious Landscape |publisher=[[Pew Research Center]]: Religion & Public Life |date=18 December 2012 |accessdate=}}</ref> About 16% of the world's population is religiously unaffiliated.<ref name=EB2012 />
Կրոնը ոչ միայն հիմնված է գերբնական ուժերի նկատմամբ հավատի վրա, այլ նաև սահմանում է որոշակի վերաբերմունք և վարվելակերպ դրա նկատմամբ։
The study of religion encompasses a wide variety of academic disciplines, including [[theology]], comparative religion and social scientific studies. Theories of religion offer various explanations for the origins and workings of religion.


==Etymology and history of the concept of ''Religion''==
Հայերենում, ըստ Հ. Աճառյանի «Արմատական բառարանի» «կրոն» բառն առաջացել է '''կիր''' (կրել) արմատից – ոն (օն) մասնիկով ստուգաբանվում է որպես՝ ''կարգ, կանոն, վարք, օրենք, սովորություն, վարդապետություն, հավատք''։ Ըստ «Հայկազյան բառարանի»՝ ''կրել'' և ''պահել'' կամ'' կրելի օրենք''։ Ղ. Ալիշանի բացատրությամբ՝ ''կիրք'' բառից, իբրև ''«ներքին զգացում»''։
Կրոնը ծագել է մարդու հետ՝ նախնադարյան շրջանում։


===Religion===
== Կրոնի կառուցվածքային տարրեր ==
''Religion'' (from O.Fr. ''religion'' "religious community", from L. ''religionem'' (nom. ''religio'') "respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods",<ref>{{OEtymD|religion}}</ref> "obligation, the bond between man and the gods"<ref>''[[Shorter Oxford English Dictionary]]''</ref>) is derived from the Latin ''[[Religio|religiō]]'', the ultimate origins of which are obscure. One possible interpretation traced to [[Cicero]], connects ''{{lang|la|lego}}'' "read", i.e. ''re'' (again) with ''lego'' in the sense of "choose", "go over again" or "consider carefully". Modern scholars such as [[Tom Harpur]] and [[Joseph Campbell]] favor the derivation from ''{{lang|la|ligare}}'' "bind, connect", probably from a prefixed ''{{lang|la|re-ligare}}'', i.e. ''re'' (again) + ''ligare'' or "to reconnect", which was made prominent by [[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]], following the interpretation of [[Lactantius]].<ref>In ''The Pagan Christ: Recovering the Lost Light.'' Toronto. Thomas Allen, 2004. ISBN 0-88762-145-7</ref><ref>In ''[[The Power of Myth]],'' with Bill Moyers, ed. Betty Sue Flowers, New York, Anchor Books, 1991. ISBN 0-385-41886-8</ref> The medieval usage alternates with ''order'' in designating bonded communities like those of [[monastic orders]]: "we hear of the 'religion' of the [[Order of the Golden Fleece|Golden Fleece]], of a knight 'of the [[Order of Aviz|religion of Avys]]'".<ref>[[Johan Huizinga]], ''[[The Autumn of the Middle Ages|The Waning of the Middle Ages]]'' (1919) 1924:75.</ref>
Կրոնի կառուցվածքային տարրերն են՝ կրոնական գիտակցությունը, պաշտամունքը և կազմակերպությունը։
== Կրոնական գիտակցություն ==
Կրոնական գիտակցության հիմնական հատկանիշը հավատն է գերբնականի նկատմամբ, որը դրսևորվում է գերբնական էակների (աստվածներ, ոգիներ են), բնական երևույթների միջև գերբնական կապերի (մոգություն, տոտեմիզմ), նյութական իրերի գերբնական հատկությունների ([[ֆետիշիզմ]]) գոյության ընդունմամբ, դրանց նկատմամբ հուզական վերաբերմունքով և պրակտիկ պատրանքային փոխհարաբերությամբ։
== Կրոնական պաշտամունք ==
Կրոնական պաշտամունքի առարկան գերբնականն է։ Պաշտամունքային գործունեության տարրերն են՝ ծեսը, կրոնական տոները, զոհաբերությունը։ Կրոնական կազմակերպությունը որոշակի դավանանքի տեր մարդկանց միավորումն է։ Նախնադարում կրոնական խումբը համընկել է ցեղի կամ տոհմի հետ։ Դասակարգային հասարակությունում ցեղային պաշտամունքը փոխարինվել է պետականով, իսկ առանձին կրոնական միավորումներն՝ եկեղեցով։ էթնիկական հանրությունների ընդգրկման սահմանները նկատի ունենալով՝ կրոնը կարելի է դասակարգել.
1. տոհմացեղային կամ նախնադարյան հասարակության իշխող կրոններ (մոգություն, տոտեմիզմ, ֆետիշիզմ, [[անիմիզմ]] են)
2. ազգային կամ մեկ էթնիկական կազմավորմանը վերաբերող կրոններ ([[հուդայականություն]], [[հինդուիզմ]], շայնիզմ են)
3. համաշխարհային կրոններ (բուդդայականություն, քրիստոնեություն, մահմեդականություն):


In the ancient and medieval world, the etymological Latin root ''religio'' was understood as an individual virtue of worship, never as doctrine, practice, or actual source of knowledge.<ref name="Harrison Territories" /> The modern concept of "religion" as an abstraction which entails distinct sets of beliefs or doctrines is a recent invention in the English language since such usage began with texts from the 17th century due to the splitting of Christendom during the Protestant Reformation and more prevalent colonization or globalization in the age of exploration which involved contact with numerous foreign and indigenous cultures with non-European languages.<ref name="Harrison Territories">{{cite book |last1=Harrison |first1=Peter |title=The Territories of Science and Religion |date=2015 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=022618448X}}</ref> It was in the 17th century that the concept of "religion" received its modern shape despite the fact that ancient texts like the Bible, the Quran, and other ancient sacred texts did not have a concept of religion in the original languages and neither did the people or the cultures in which these sacred texts were written.<ref name=Nongbri>{{cite book |last1=Nongbri |first1=Brent |title=Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept |date=2013 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=030015416X}}</ref> For example, the Greek word ''threskeia'', which was used by Greek writers such as Herodotus and Josephus and is found in texts like the New Testament, is sometimes translated as "religion" today, however, the term was understood as "worship" well into the medieval period.<ref name=Nongbri /> In the Quran, the Arabic word ''din'' is often translated as "religion" in modern translations, but up to the mid-1600s translators expressed ''din'' as "law".<ref name=Nongbri /> Even in the 1st century AD, Josephus had used the Greek term ''ioudaismos'', which some translate as "Judaism" today, even though he used it as an ethnic term, not one linked to modern abstract concepts of religion as a set of beliefs.<ref name=Nongbri /> It was in the 19th century that the terms "Buddhism", "Hinduism", "Taoism", and "Confucianism" first emerged.<ref name="Harrison Territories" /><ref name="Invention Japan">{{cite book |last1=Josephson |first1=Jason Ananda |title=The Invention of Religion in Japan |date=2012 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=0226412342}}</ref> Throughout its long history, Japan had no concept of "religion" since there was no corresponding Japanese word, nor anything close to its meaning, but when American warships appeared off the coast of Japan in 1853 and forced the Japanese government to sign treaties demanding, among other things, freedom of religion, the country had to contend with this Western idea.<ref name="Invention Japan" />
== Կրոնի ծագումը ==
Ազգային և համաշխարհային կրոններն իրենց հերթին բաժանվում են բազմաթիվ ուղղությունների և աղանդների։ Հայտնի են կրոնի ծագման և սոցիալական դերի բազմաթիվ մեկնաբանություններ։ [[Աստվածաբանություն]]ը և [[իդեալիզմ]]ը քարոզում են կրոնի՝ բնածնության ուսմունքը։ Կրոն բխել է համաշխարհային ոգուց, անհատի ներքին ապրումներից ու պահանջներից, հանգեցվել անհատական կամ կոլեկտիվ մտածողության ([[Պլատոն]], [[Հեգել]], [[Է. Թեյլոր]], Հ. Սպենսեր, Է. Դյուրկհեյմ, Ու. Ջեմս, Զ. Ֆրեյդ): Մինչ մարքսիստական աթեիստական միտքը փորձում էր հիմնավորել, որ ոչ թե կրոնն է մարդուն ստեղծել, այլ մարդը՝ կրոնը։ Զարգացնելով Սպինոզայի, Թ. Հոբսի, ժ. Մելյեի, Վոլտերի, Պ. Հոլբախի և մյուսների աթեիստական գաղափարները՝ հայ առաջավոր մտածողները նույնպես գտնում էին, որ կրոնի երկրային ծագում ունի։ [[Միքայել Նալբանդյան]]ը պնդում էր, որ կրոնը տգիտության և սարսափի արդյունք է, [[Ստեփանոս Նազարյան]]ի կարծիքով՝ բնական երևույթները ճիշտ չհասկանալու, իսկ ըստ Գ. Կոստանդյանի՝ «Կրոնի երևակայած խորհուրդները՝ մարդերե շինված են»: Մինչ դեռ անհրաժեշտ էր իրական կյանքի հարաբերություններից բխեցնել համապա տասխան կրոնական ձևերը, որը, ինչպես նշում են մարքսիզմի դասականները, միակ մատերիալիստական և, հետևաբար, միակ գիտական մեթոդն էր։ [[Մարքսիզմ]]ը, չընդունելով կրոնի ծագման և սոցիալական դերի մասին իդեալիստական տեսությունները գտնում է, որ այն սոցիալ-պատմական երևույթ է, և նրա վերացումը պետք է կապել կրոն-ծնող սոցիալական պատճառների վերացման հետ։ Կրոնը առաջացել է բնական և հասարակական ուժերի դեմ նախնադարյան մարդու պայքարի հարաբերական անզորությամբ։ Չկարողանալով բացատրել իրական երևույթները՝ մարդը մտացածին կապեր ու գերբնական հատկություններ է հաստատել այնտեղ, ուր իշխում են օբյեկտիվ օրինաչափությունները։ Տեսական մտածողության սաղմնավորման շնորհիվ մարդը, առարկայական իրականությունից վերացարկվելով, իր մտացածին երևակայական ուժերին հաղորդում է ինքնուրույն գոյություն, սուբաոանցիոնալ, կար գավորիդ նշանակություն, ապա և կենդանի, անձնավորված էակի (օրինակ աստծու) հատկանիշներ։ Այսպես ձևավորվել է կրոնի ծագման իմացաբանական հնարավորությունը։ Այս պրոցեսի և կրոնական պատկերացումների առաջացման համար էական ազդեցություն են ունեցել նաև մարդկային հույզերն ու ապրումները (սարսափ, վախ, միայնություն, դժբախ տություն): Կրոնի իմացաբանական արմատների կապակցությամբ Լենինը նշում է, որ «Նա անհող չէ, նա անպտուղ ծաղիկ է, անտարակույս, բայց մի անպտուղ ծաղիկ, որը բուսնում է մարդկային... կենդանի ծառի վրա»: Այստեղից բխում է նաև կրոնի և իդեալիզմի իմացաբանական արմատների ընդհանրությունը։ Սակայն կրոնի առաջացման իմացաբանական հնարավորությունը կարող է իրականության վերածվել միայն սոցիալ-տնտեսական որոշակի պայմանների առկայության դեպքում։
== Կրոնի բնութագրումը նախնադարում ==
Նախնադարյան հասարակարգում կրոնը սոցիալականորեն պայմանավորված էր արտադրողական ուժերի ցածր մակարդակով, բնության և իրար նկատմամբ մարդկանց հարաբերությունների սահմանափակությամբ։
== Կրոնի բնութագրումը դասակարգային հասարակություններում ==
Դասակարգային հասարակություններում կրոնի սոցիալական պայմանավորվածությունը արտահայտվում է դասակարգային ճնշման ու շահագործման ձևով։ «Աշխատավոր մասսաների սոցիալական ճնշվածությունը, գրել է [[Վլադիմիր Իլյիչ Լենին]]ը, նրանց առերևույթ կատարյալ անօգնականու թյունը կապիտալիզմի կույր ուժերի հանդեպ, որն ամեն օր և ամեն ժամ հազարապատիկ ավելի ամենասոսկալի տառապանքներ, ամենավայրագ տանջանքներ է պատճառում շարքային բանվոր մարդկանց, քան ամեն տեսակ արտակարգ պատահարները... ահա թե որտեղ է կրոնի արդի ամենախոր արմատը»: Կրոնի հասարակական հետադիմական դեր է կատարում և ծառայում է իրեն սնող հասարակական հարաբերությունների պահպանմանը։ Այս պատճառով, «Կրոնական թշվառությունը միաժամանակ իրական թշվառության արտահայտությունն է և այդ իրական թշվառության դեմ ուղղված բողոքը։ Կրոնը ճնշված արարածի հառաչանքն է, անգութ աշխարհի սիրտն է, ճիշտ այնպես, ինչպես վայրագ կարգերի ոգին է այն։ Կրոնը ժողովրդի հաշիշն է» : Կրոնը արգելակել է հասարակության առաջադիմությունը, դանդաղեցրել տնտեսության, մշակույթի, գիտության, արվեստի զարգացումը։ Հասարակական կյանքի վերաբերյալ կրոնական գաղափարախոսությունը եղել և մնում է նախախնամական և ճակատագրապաշտական։ Այն թերագնահատում է մարդու տեղն ու դերը պատմության մեջ, խոչընդոտում իրականության գիտական իմաստավորումը, հասարակության առաջընթացը, ձևակերպում կեղծ պատկերացումներ տիեզերքի կառուցվածքի մասին, մշակում մտածողության և վարքագծի որոշակի ստերիոտիպեր, հավատացյալներին ներարկում սեփական անձի թշվառության, մեղավորության զգացումներ, աստծուն վերագրում ուժի, արդարության, բարության հատկանիշներ, բացասական վերաբերմունք դաստիարակում իրական աշխարհի նկատմամբ, մարդկանց ապագան կապում հանդերձյալ աշխարհի» գոյության հետ։ Իր շատ հատկանիշներով կրոնը կապվում է իդեալիզմի հետ, անհամատեղելի դառնում գիտական մտածողության հետ։ ՍՍՀՄ-ում հակամարտ դասակարգերի վերացումով վերացան կրոն ծնող սոցիալական արմատները։ Եկեղեցին բաժանված է պետությունից, և կրոնի նկատմամբ մարդ կանց վերաբերմունքը իրականանում է առանց հարկադրանքի՝ խղճի ազատության սկզբունքով։ Միևնույն ժամանակ սոցիալիստական հասարակարգում պայմաններ են ստեղծվում մարդկանց գիտակցությունը կրոնական հայացքներից ազատելու համար։ Այս գործում խոշոր դեր ունի նաև աթեիստական դաստիարա կությունը (տես [[Աթեիզմ]]): Իսկ «Իրական աշխարհի կրոնական արտացոլումը կարող է ընդհանրապես չքանալ միայն այն ժամանակ, երբ մարդկանց առօրյա գործնական կյանքի հարաբերությունները արտահայտվեն մարդկանց՝ միմյանց և բնության նկատմամբ ունեցած հստակ ու բանական հարաբերությունների մեջ»: Սոցիալիզմի հաղթանակը ՍՍՀՍ-ում ու սոցիալիզմի համաշխարհա յին համակարգի ստեղծումը, գիտության, մշակույթի զարգացումն ու արդի գիտատեխնիկական առաջադիմությունը խոր ճգնաժամի մեջ են գցել կրոնական գիտակցությունը։ Սեկընդմիշտ բացահայտվել է իրականության հետ կրոնի ունեցած հակասությունը, բնական և հասարակական երևույթների քննարկման ու օբյեկտիվ գնահատման նրա անզորությունը։


According to the [[philologist]] [[Max Müller]] in the 19th century, the root of the English word "religion", the [[Latin]] ''[[:wikt:religio|religio]]'', was originally used to mean only "reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, [[pietas|piety]]" (which [[Cicero]] further derived to mean "diligence").<ref>[[Max Müller]], ''Natural Religion'', p.33, 1889</ref><ref>[http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3D%2340976 Lewis & Short, ''A Latin Dictionary'']</ref> [[Max Müller]] characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What is called ancient religion today, they would have only called "law".<ref>[[Max Müller]]. ''[https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA28&id=aM0FAAAAQAAJ&as_brr=4 Introduction to the science of religion]''. p. 28.</ref>
== Տոհմացեղային կամ նախնդարյան հասարակության հավատալիքներ ==


Some languages have words that can be translated as "religion", but they may use them in a very different way, and some have no word for religion at all. For example, the [[Sanskrit]] word [[dharma]], sometimes translated as "religion", also means law. Throughout classical [[South Asia]], the [[Dharmaśāstra|study of law]] consisted of concepts such as [[Prāyaścitta|penance through piety]] and [[Ācāra|ceremonial as well as practical traditions]]. Medieval Japan at first had a similar union between "imperial law" and universal or "Buddha law", but these later became independent sources of power.<ref>[[Toshio Kuroda|Kuroda, Toshio]] and Jacqueline I. Stone, translator. {{Wayback |df=yes|date=20030323095019 |url=http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/jjrs/pdf/477.pdf |title="The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law"}}. ''Japanese Journal of Religious Studies'' 23.3-4 (1996)</ref><ref>Neil McMullin. ''Buddhism and the State in Sixteenth-Century Japan''. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1984.</ref>
* [[Մոգություն]]
* [[Կախարդություն]]
* [[Ոգեպաշտություն]]
* [[Բնապաշտություն]]
* [[Տոտեմիզմ]]
* [[Ֆետիշիզմ]]
* [[Անիմիզմ]]


There is no precise equivalent of "religion" in Hebrew, and [[Judaism]] does not distinguish clearly between religious, national, racial, or ethnic identities.<ref>Hershel Edelheit, Abraham J. Edelheit, [http://www.questia.com/library/book/history-of-zionism-a-handbook-and-dictionary-by-abfaham-j-edelheit-hershel-edelheit.jsp History of Zionism: A Handbook and Dictionary], p.3, citing [[Solomon Zeitlin]], ''The Jews. Race, Nation, or Religion?'' ( Philadelphia: Dropsie College Press, 1936).</ref> One of its central concepts is "halakha", meaning the "walk" or "path" sometimes translated as "law", which guides religious practice and belief and many aspects of daily life.<ref name="WhitefordII2008">{{cite book |last1=Whiteford |first1=Linda M. |last2=Trotter II |first2=Robert T. |title=Ethics for Anthropological Research and Practice |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZeokAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA22 |year=2008 |publisher=Waveland Press |isbn=978-1-4786-1059-5 |page=22}}</ref>
== Ազգային կամ մեկ էթնիկական կազմավորման կրոններ ==
* [[Հինդուիզմ]]
* [[Հուդայականություն]]
* [[Ջայնիզմ]]
* [[Սինտոյիզմ]]
* [[Զրադաշտականություն|Զրադաշտական կրոն]]
* [[Հեթանոսություն]]


===Faith===
== Համաշխարհային կրոններ ==
The word ''religion'' is sometimes used interchangeably with ''[[faith]]'' or ''[[dharma|set of duties]]'';<ref>{{cite book |last=Kant |first=Immanuel |title=Religion and Rational Theology |year=2001 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9780521799980 |page=177}}</ref> however, in the words of [[Émile Durkheim]], religion differs from private belief in that it is "something eminently social".<ref>Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, E. (1915) ''[[The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]]''. London: George Allen & Unwin, p.10.</ref>
* [[Բուդդայականություն]]
* [[Իսլամ]]
* [[Քրիստոնեություն]]


===Other terms===
== Տես նաև ==
The use of other terms, such as obedience to God or [[Islam]] are likewise grounded in particular histories and vocabularies.<ref>Colin Turner. ''Islam without Allah?'' New York: Routledge, 2000. pp. 11-12.</ref>
* [[Աթեիզմ]]
* [[Աղանդավորություն]]
* [[Անապատականություն]]
* [[Կաբալա]]
* [[Կրակապաշտություն]]
* [[Հայ Առաքելական եկեղեցի]]


==Definitions==
== Ծանոթագրություններ ==
{{Main article|Definition of religion}}
{{ծանցանկ}}


===Religion as modern western construct===
[[Կատեգորիա:Կրոն]]
An increasing number of scholars have expressed reservations about ever defining the "essence" of religion.<ref>McKinnon, AM. (2002). 'Sociological Definitions, Language Games and the "Essence" of Religion'. Method & theory in the study of religion, vol 14, no. 1, pp. 61–83. [http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/3073/1/McKinnon_Definition_of_Religion_author_version_no_format.pdf]</ref> They observe that the way we use the concept today is a particularly modern construct that would not have been understood through much of history and in many cultures outside the West (or even in the West until after the [[Peace of Westphalia]]).<ref>Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1978). The Meaning and End of Religion New York: Harper and Row</ref> The MacMIllan Encyclopedia of Religions states:
{{quote|The very attempt to define religion, to find some distinctive or possibly unique essence or set of qualities that distinguish the "religious" from the remainder of human life, is primarily a Western concern. The attempt is a natural consequence of the Western speculative, intellectualistic, and scientific disposition. It is also the product of the dominant Western religious mode, what is called the Judeo-Christian climate or, more accurately, the theistic inheritance from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The theistic form of belief in this tradition, even when downgraded culturally, is formative of the dichotomous Western view of religion. That is, the basic structure of theism is essentially a distinction between a transcendent deity and all else, between the creator and his creation, between God and man.<ref>MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, ''Religion'', p.</ref>}}


===Classical definitions===
[[File:Urarina shaman B Dean.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Urarina]] [[shaman]], Peru, 1988]]


[[Friedrich Schleiermacher]] in the late 18th century defined religion as ''das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl'', commonly translated as "a feeling of absolute dependence".<ref>Hueston A. Finlay. "'Feeling of absolute dependence' or 'absolute feeling of dependence'? A question revisited". ''Religious Studies'' 41.1 (2005), pp.81-94.</ref>


His contemporary [[Hegel]] disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as "the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit."<ref>[[Max Müller]]. "Lectures on the origin and growth of religion."</ref>


[[Edward Burnett Tylor]] defined religion in 1871 as "the belief in spiritual beings".<ref name="archive.org">Tylor, E.B. (1871) ''[https://archive.org/stream/primitiveculture1tylouoft#page/424/mode/2up Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Vol. 1]''. London: John Murray; (p.424).</ref> He argued that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or [[idolatry]] and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious, and thus "has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them". He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.


In his book ''[[The Varieties of Religious Experience]]'', the psychologist [[William James]] defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine".<ref name="James, W. 1902 p. 31"/> By the term "divine" James meant "any object that is god''like'', whether it be a concrete deity or not"<ref>(''ibid'', p. 34)</ref> to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.<ref>(''ibid'', p. 38)</ref>
{{Религия}}
'''Рели́гия''' ({{lang-la|religare}} — воссоединять) — особая форма осознания мира, обусловленная [[вера|верой]] в [[сверхъестественное]], включающая в себя свод [[мораль]]ных норм и типов поведения, [[обряд]]ов, культовых действий и объединение людей в организации ([[Христианская церковь|церковь]], [[умма]], [[сангха]], религиозная [[Идейная община|община]]).<ref name="Кругосвет">''Елена Казарина'' {{Из|Кругосвет|http://www.krugosvet.ru/enc/kultura_i_obrazovanie/religiya/RELIGIYA.html}}</ref>


The sociologist [[Durkheim]], in his seminal book ''[[The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]]'', defined religion as a "unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things".<ref name="Durkheim, E. 1915"/> By sacred things he meant things "set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them". Sacred things are not, however, limited to gods or spirits.<ref group=note>That is how, according to Durkheim, Buddhism is a religion. "In default of gods, Buddhism admits the existence of sacred things, namely, the [[Four Noble Truths|four noble truths]] and the practices derived from them" (''ibid'', p. 45).</ref> On the contrary, a sacred thing can be "a rock, a tree, a spring, a pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred".<ref>(''ibid'', p. 37)</ref> Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and powers which are attributed to them.<ref>(''ibid'', pp. 40–41)</ref>
Другие определения религии:
* учение о воссоединении человека с [[Бог]]ом (по мнению христианского апологета [[Лактанций|Лактанция]]). Предложенная Лактанцием этимология закрепилась в христианской культуре, как основная<ref name="Религиовединие">Раздел IV. Религия как общественный феномен // Религиоведение: Учебное пособие и Учебный словарь-минимум / Под ред. [[Яблоков, Игорь Николаевич|И. Н. Яблокова]]. — М.: Кн. дом «Университет», 2000. —800 с.</ref>.
* одна из форм [[Общественное сознание|общественного сознания]]; совокупность духовных представлений, основывающихся на [[вера|вере]] в сверхъестественные силы и существа ([[Божество|божеств]], [[Дух (мифология)|духов]]), которые являются предметом поклонения<ref>{{cite web |url=http://mega.km.ru/ojigov/encyclop.asp?TopicNumber=30587&search=%F0%E5%EB%E8%E3%E8%FF#srch0 |title=Толковый словарь русского языка |author= |work= |deadlink=404 }}</ref>.
* организованное поклонение высшим силам. Религия не только представляет собой веру в существование высших сил, но устанавливает особые отношения к этим силам: она есть, следовательно, известная деятельность воли, направленная к этим силам<ref name="ESBE">{{ВТ-ЭСБЕ+|Религия|[[Трубецкой, Сергей Николаевич|Трубецкой С. Н.]]}} Т. 26 А. — СПб., 1899. — С. 539—544.</ref>.
* духовная формация, особый тип отношения человека к миру и самому себе, обусловленный представлениями об инобытии как доминирующей по отношению к обыденному существованию реальности{{sfn|Забияко|2008|с=1069}}.
* [[Джемс, Уильям|Уильям Джеймс]] описывает религиозную веру как убеждённость в существовании некого незримого порядка и в том, что высшее благо — гармонично вписаться в этот порядок<ref>Райт Роберт [http://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%A0/rajt-robert/evolyuciya-boga-bog-glazami-biblii-korana-i-nauki/6 ЧАСТЬ V. БОГ ГЛОБАЛИЗИРУЕТСЯ (ИЛИ НЕТ). «Эволюция бога: Бог глазами Библии, Корана и науки»]</ref>.


Echoes of James' and Durkheim's definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, [[Frederick Ferré]] who defined religion as "one's way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively".<ref>Frederick Ferré, F. (1967) ''Basic modern philosophy of religion''. Scribner, (p.82).</ref> Similarly, for the theologian [[Paul Tillich]], faith is "the state of being ultimately concerned",<ref name="Tillich, P. 1957 p.1"/> which "is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life."<ref>Tillich, P. (1959) ''Theology of Culture''. Oxford University Press; (p.8).</ref>
Также термин «религия» может пониматься в таких смыслах, как ''субъективно-личностный'' (религия как индивидуальная «вера», «религиозность» и т. п.) и ''объективно-общий'' (религия в качестве институционального явления — «вероисповедания», «богопочитания», «конфессии» и прочее).{{sfn-1|Аринин|1998|с=15}}


When religion is seen in terms of "sacred", "divine", intensive "valuing", or "ultimate concern", then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g. [[Richard Dawkins]]) do not necessarily disturb its adherents.<ref>Pecorino, P.A. (2001) [http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/pecorip/scccweb/etexts/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_10_DEFINITION/The-Definition-of-Religion.htm ''Philosophy of Religion. Online Textbook'']. Philip A. Pecorino.</ref>
Религиозная система представления мира ([[мировоззрение]]) опирается на [[вера|религиозную веру]] и связана с отношением человека к надчеловеческому духовному миру<ref name="Кураев">{{книга
|автор = [[Кураев, Андрей Вячеславович|Кураев А. В.]], [[протодиакон]], [[кандидат философских наук|к.ф.н.]]
|заглавие = Уроки сектоведения
|ссылка = http://kuraev.ru/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=54&func=fileinfo&id=21
|место = СПб.
|издательство = Формика
|год = 2002
|страниц = 448
|isbn = 5-7754-0039-9
}} «(Религиозных) целей существует две: 1) контакт с надчеловеческим духовным миром („высшими силами“); 2) преодоление смерти, понимаемое как следствие состоявшегося „контакта“»</ref>, некой сверхчеловеческой реальности, о которой человек кое-что знает, и на которую он должен некоторым образом ориентировать свою жизнь<ref name="Доусон">{{книга |автор=[[:en:Christopher Dawson|Доусон К. Г.]] |заглавие=Религия и культура |место=СПб. |год=2000 |страницы=62}}</ref>. Вера может подкрепляться [[Религиозный опыт|мистическим опытом]].


===Modern definitions===
Особую важность для религии представляют такие понятия, как [[добро и зло]], [[нравственность]], цель и [[смысл жизни]] и т. д.
The anthropologist [[Clifford Geertz]] defined religion as a
{{quote|...system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic."<ref name="Geertz, C. 1993 pp.87-125">Geertz, C. (1993) ''Religion as a cultural system''. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, Geertz, Clifford, pp.87-125. Fontana Press.</ref>}}


Alluding perhaps to [[Edward Burnett Tylor|Tylor's]] "deeper motive", Geertz remarked that
Основы религиозных представлений большинства мировых религий записаны людьми в священных текстах, которые, по убеждению верующих, либо продиктованы или вдохновлены непосредственно [[Бог]]ом или богами, либо написаны людьми, достигшими с точки зрения каждой конкретной религии высшего [[Дух (философия)|духовного]] состояния, великими учителями, особо [[Просветление|просветлёнными]] или посвящёнными, [[Святой|святыми]] и т. п.
{{quote|...we have very little idea of how, in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate it".<ref>(''ibid'', p. 90)</ref>}}


The theologian [[Antoine Vergote]] took the term "supernatural" simply to mean whatever transcends the powers of nature or human agency. He also emphasized the "cultural reality" of religion, which he defined as
В большинстве религиозных сообществ заметное место занимает [[духовенство]] (служители [[религиозный культ|религиозного культа]]{{sfn|Баев|2011|с=}}).
{{quote|...the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings.<ref name="vergote">Vergote, A. (1996) ''Religion, belief and unbelief. A Psychological Study'', Leuven University Press. (p. 16)</ref>}}


[[Peter Mandaville]] and [[Paul James (academic)|Paul James]] intended to get away from the modernist dualisms or dichotomous understandings of immanence/transcendence, spirituality/materialism, and sacredness/secularity. They define religion as
Религия является преобладающим мировоззрением в большинстве стран мира, большинство опрошенных относят себя к одному из вероисповеданий<ref>{{книга|автор=Г. Д. Левин|часть=Материализм|заглавие=Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки|ответственный=Составление и общая редакция. [[Касавин, Илья Теодорович|И. Т. Касавин]]|место=Москва|издательство=«Канон+» РООИ «Реабилитация»|год=2009|страницы=472--473|страниц=1248|isbn=978-5-88373-089-3|тираж=800}}</ref><ref>[http://www.levada.ru/17-12-2012/v-rossii-74-pravoslavnykh-i-7-musulman Левада-Центр/Пресс-выпуски/В России 74 % православных и 7 % мусульман]</ref>.
{{quote|...a relatively-bounded system of beliefs, symbols and practices that addresses the nature of existence, and in which communion with others and Otherness is ''lived'' as if it both takes in and spiritually transcends socially-grounded ontologies of time, space, embodiment and knowing.<ref name="Paul James and Peter Mandaville 2010">{{Cite book |last1=James |first1=Paul |last2=Mandaville |first2=Peter |year=2010 |lastauthoramp=yes |title=Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions |url=https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010 |publisher=Sage Publications |location=London}}</ref>}}


According to the MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, there is an experiential aspect to religion which can be found in almost every culture:
== Этимология слова «религия» ==
{{quote|..."almost every known culture [has] a depth dimension in cultural experiences [...] toward some sort of ultimacy and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life. When more or less distinct patterns of behavior are built around this depth dimension in a culture, this structure constitutes religion in its historically recognizable form. Religion is the organization of life around the depth dimensions of experience—varied in form, completeness, and clarity in accordance with the environing culture.<ref>MacMillan Encyclopedia of religions, ''Religion'', p.7695</ref>}}
В древности существовало несколько точек зрения на происхождение слова «религия» ({{lang-la|religio}} — «совестливость, благочестие, набожность, предмет культа»{{sfn|Элбакян|2001|с=488}}). Так, знаменитый римский оратор, писатель и политический деятель I в. до н. э. [[Марк Туллий Цицерон|Цицерон]] считал, что оно является производным от латинского глагола ''relegere'' (''вновь собирать, снова обсуждать, опять обдумывать, откладывать на особое употребление''), что в переносном смысле означает «благоговеть» или «относиться к чему-либо с особым вниманием, почтением». Отсюда и самое существо религии Цицерон видел в благоговении перед высшими силами, Божеством{{sfn|Цицерон|1985|с=60-61}}{{sfn|Элбакян|2001|с=488}}{{sfn|Жуковский, Копцева, Пивоваров|2006|с=8}}<ref name="Osipov" />.


==Aspects==
Известный западный христианский писатель и оратор [[Лактанций]] считал, что термин «религия» происходит от латинского глагола ''religare'' (связывать, привязывать), поэтому религию он определял как союз человека с [[Бог]]ом{{sfn|Элбакян|2001|с=488}}{{sfn|Жуковский, Копцева, Пивоваров|2006|с=8}}<ref name="Osipov" />.
{{expand section|date=December 2015}}
A religion is a [[cultural system]] of [[religious behaviour|behaviors]] and practices, [[world view]]s, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and [[Religious organization|societal organisation]] that relate [[human]]ity to an order of existence.


===Practices===
Подобным же образом понимал существо религии и [[Аврелий Августин|блаженный Августин]], хотя он считал, что слово «религия» произошло от глагола ''religare'', то есть ''воссоединять'', и сама религия означает воссоединение, возобновление когда-то утерянного союза между человеком и Богом<ref name="Osipov" >{{книга |ссылка=http://www.wco.ru/biblio/books/osip14/Main.htm |заглавие=Путь разума в поисках истины |автор=[[Осипов, Алексей Ильич|Осипов А. И.]]|издательство=Издание Сретенского монастыря|место=М.|год= 2002}}</ref>.
{{Main article|Religious behaviour|Religious practice}}


The practices of a religion may include [[ritual]]s, [[sermon]]s, commemoration or veneration (of a [[deity]], [[God (male deity)|gods]], or [[goddess]]es), [[sacrifice]]s, [[festival]]s, [[Banquet|feasts]], [[trance]]s, [[initiation]]s, [[funeral|funerary services]], [[matrimony|matrimonial services]], [[meditation]], [[prayer]], [[music]], [[art]], [[dance]], [[Community service|public service]], or other aspects of human culture.<ref name="OD">[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/mythology Oxford Dictionaries] mythology, retrieved 9 September 2012</ref>
Современные исследователи зачастую соглашаются с точкой зрения на происхождение слова «религия» от глагола ''religare''{{sfn|Жуковский, Копцева, Пивоваров|2006|с=8}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dictionary.reference.com/etymology/religion|title=Religion|author=|work=Online Etymology Dictionary|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHiciY4|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref>.


===Worldview===
== Структура религии ==
Religions have [[sacred history|sacred histories]], [[narrative]]s, and [[mythology|mythologies]] which may be preserved in sacred [[Religious text|scriptures]], and [[Religious symbol|symbol]]s and [[holy places]], that aim to explain the [[meaning of life]], the [[creation myth|origin of life]], or the [[religious cosmology|Universe]].{{citation needed|date=March 2016}}
В [[Социология|социологии]] в структуре религии выделяют следующие компоненты:
* '''религиозное сознание''', которое может быть обыденным (личное отношение) и концептуальным (учение о [[Бог]]е, нормы образа жизни и т. п.),
* '''религиозная деятельность''', которая подразделяется на культовую и внекультовую,
* '''религиозные отношения''' (культовые, внекультовые),
* '''религиозные организации'''.


===Religious beliefs===
== Виды религий ==
{{Main article|Religious beliefs}}
Для религий Древнего [[Древнеегипетская религия|Египта]], [[История индуизма|Индии]], [[Древнегреческая мифология|Греции]], [[Древнеримская религия|Рима]], [[Мифология ацтеков|ацтеков]], [[Религия Майя|майя]], [[Германо-скандинавская мифология|древних германцев]], [[Славянская религия|древней Руси]] характерно было [[политеизм|многобожие — политеизм]].
Traditionally, [[faith]], in addition to reason, has been considered a source of religious beliefs. The interplay between faith and reason, and their use as actual or perceived support for religious beliefs, have been a subject of interest to philosophers and theologians.<ref name="iep.utm.edu"/>


====Mythology====
[[монотеизм|Единобожие (монотеизм)]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stavroskrest.ru/sites/default/files/audio/books/maski_avtoritarnosti.pdf|title=Маски авторитарности: очерки о гуру. Монотеизм: универсальная абстракция|author=Крамер Д., Олстед Д.|work=|publisher=[[Прогресс-Традиция]]|year=2002|pages=408|isbn=5-89826-031-5|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHj9lm0|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref> характерно для таких религий, как [[иудаизм]], [[христианство]], [[ислам]], [[сикхизм]] и некоторых других. С точки зрения верующих, приверженцев вышеперечисленных религий, появление их стало следствием Божественного действия.
{{Main article|Mythology}}
The word ''myth'' has several meanings.
# A traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon;
# A person or thing having only an imaginary or unverifiable existence; or
# A metaphor for the spiritual potentiality in the human being.<ref>Joseph Campbell, ''The Power of Myth'', p. 22 ISBN 0-385-24774-5</ref>


Ancient [[polytheism|polytheistic]] religions, such as those of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]], [[Ancient Rome|Rome]], and [[Scandinavia]], are usually categorized under the heading of [[mythology]]. Religions of pre-industrial peoples, or [[culture]]s in development, are similarly called "myths" in the [[anthropology of religion]]. The term "myth" can be used pejoratively by both religious and non-religious people. By defining another person's religious stories and beliefs as mythology, one implies that they are less real or true than one's own religious stories and beliefs. [[Joseph Campbell]] remarked, "Mythology is often thought of as ''other people's'' religions, and religion can be defined as mis-interpreted mythology."<ref>Joseph Campbell, ''Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor''. Ed. Eugene Kennedy. New World Library ISBN 1-57731-202-3.</ref>
[[Пантеизм]] — учение, согласно которому Вселенная (природа) и Бог тождественны. Пантеизм был распространён в ряде античных религиозно-философских школ ([[стоики]] и др.), в ряде средневековых учений (см. [[Спиноза]] и т. д.). Многие элементы пантеизма присутствуют в отдельных формах язычества и неоязычества, а также в ряде современных синкретических оккультных учений: [[теософия|теософии]], [[Агни-йога|Агни-йоге]] и др.


In sociology, however, the term ''myth'' has a non-pejorative meaning. There, ''myth'' is defined as a story that is important for the group whether or not it is objectively or provably true.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.britannica.com/topic/myth|title=myth|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=24 April 2016}}</ref> Examples include the [[resurrection]] of their real-life founder [[Jesus]], which, to Christians, explains the means by which they are freed from sin, is symbolic of the power of life over death, and is also said to be a historical event. But from a mythological outlook, whether or not the event actually occurred is unimportant. Instead, the [[symbol]]ism of the death of an old "life" and the start of a new "life" is what is most significant. Religious believers may or may not accept such symbolic interpretations.
Существуют также религии без Бога (в том смысле, какой придают этому понятию многие западные школы религиоведения) — вера в абстрактный [[идеал]]: [[конфуцианство]], [[буддизм]], [[джайнизм]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.humanities.edu.ru/db/msg/46684 |title=Религия как связь с Богом |author=[[Пивоваров, Даниил Валентинович|Пивоваров Д. В.]] |work= Философия религии. Курс лекций. Часть первая. Лекция 3. |publisher= }}</ref>.


===Social organisation===
== Возникновение религии ==
Religions have a societal basis, either as a living tradition which is carried by lay participants, or with an organized [[clergy]], and a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership.
Вопросом возникновения религии, прежде всего, занимается [[религиоведение]], начавшее формироваться в самостоятельную область знаний начиная с XIX века на стыке [[Социальная философия|социальной философии]], [[История философии|истории философии]], [[Социология|социологии]], [[Антропология|антропологии]], [[Психология|психологии]], всеобщей [[История|истории]], [[Этнология|этнологии]], [[Археология|археологии]] и других наук.


==Types and demographics==
На проблему возникновения религии существуют несколько точек зрения<ref>[http://www.nntu.nnov.ru/RUS/fakyl/VECH/metod/hist_relig/chapter01.htm Возникновение религии. Древнейшие формы религиозных верований] // ''Чайковский А. Е., Капочкина Н. А., Кудрявцев М. С.'' История религий. Учебное пособие. — Нижний Новгород: [[Нижегородский государственный технический университет]], ''2001''.</ref>:
{{Main article|Major religious groups}}
* ''религиозная'': человек был создан Богом, и до грехопадения общался с ним напрямую. После [[грехопадение|грехопадения]] общение с Богом было нарушено, но Бог открывал себя в [[Откровение|откровениях]], через ангелов, пророков и в богоявлениях. Человек, в свою очередь, имеет возможность обращаться к невидимому Богу (в [[молитва]]х) как непосредственно, так и через посредников. Политеизм рассматривается как результат постепенного отхода от изначального монотеизма.
{{Further|Organized religion}}
* ''промежуточная'', с одной стороны опирающаяся на современные научные знания и общественные настроения, с другой стороны основанная на главном постулате религии о сотворении мира и человека Богом, после чего (наиболее часто — в результате грехопадения) человек абсолютно забыл об общении с ним и даже о его существовании. Он вынужден заново искать путь к Богу, а поэтому каждая религия — это путь поиска возвращения к Богу. Этому взгляду соответствовала концепция [[прамонотеизм]]а, согласно которой религия в человеческом обществе существовала всегда, и к тому же изначально имела форму монотеизма, который у многих народов был впоследствии утрачен, выродившись в тотемизм, язычество и прочие немонотеистические формы религии. Концепция прамонотеизма была сформулирована шотландским учёным и литератором Э. Лэнгом, впоследствии получила своё развитие в 12-томном труде католического священника, антрополога и лингвиста [[Шмидт, Вильгельм (этнограф)|В. Шмидта]] «Происхождение идеи Бога»<ref>''[[Шмидт, Вильгельм (этнограф)|W. Schmidt.]]'' Der Ursprung der Gottesidee. V.1-12. 1912—1955</ref>. Однако позднее она была подвергнута критике<ref>Jensen, Adolf E., ''Myth and Cult among Primitive Peoples''.</ref><ref>
The list of still-active religious movements given here is an attempt to summarize the most important regional and philosophical influences on local communities, but it is by no means a complete description of every religious community, nor does it explain the most important elements of individual religiousness.
* ''[[Элиаде, Мирча|Eliade Mircea]]'', «The Quest for the 'Origins' of Religion». — '''P.162''';
* ''[[Элиаде, Мирча|Eliade Mircea]]'', Patterns in Comparative Religion. — '''P.54-58'''</ref><ref>Jacques Waardenburg, ''Reflections on the Study of Religion'' [http://books.google.ru/books?id=51BCQyxdclMC&lpg=PA221&ots=LTGsfqp42D&dq=urmonotheismus%20rejected&hl=ru&pg=PA221#v=onepage&q=urmonotheismus&f=false p.221]</ref>. По мнению [[Крывелёв, Иосиф Аронович|И. А. Крывелёва]] в сочинении Вильгельма Шмидта есть ошибки, а после смерти Шмидта его ученики, группирующиеся вокруг [[Журнал Антропос|журнала «Anthropos»]], предприняли ревизию его работы и фактически отказались от неё, постулируя в качестве первичной формы религии не прамонотеизм, а [[пратеизм]]<ref>''[[Крывелёв, Иосиф Аронович|Крывелёв И. А.]]'' Прамонотеизм // [[Большая советская энциклопедия]].</ref>.
* ''[[эволюция|эволюционная]]'': религия возникает при определённом уровне развития сознания в силу невозможности рационально объяснить наблюдаемые природные явления. Первобытный человек определял все явления как некие разумные действия, объясняя проявления природных сил волей духа, разумного начала, гораздо более могущественного, чем человек. Высшей силе приписывались человеческие эмоции и поступки, а модель взаимоотношений между этими силами копировалась с соответствующей организации человеческого общества. Согласно этому подходу, религия прогрессировала от простейших форм к более сложным: сначала был преанимизм, затем [[анимизм]], [[тотемизм]], [[политеизм]] и наконец [[монотеизм]] (см. [[Антропология религии]])<ref>Dhavamony Mariasusai. Phenomenology of religión. [[Папский Григорианский университет|Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana]], 1973. — P'''. 60-64''' — ISBN 88-7652-474-6</ref>.


===Types of religion===
Идею последовательного усложнения религиозных верований впервые предложил [[Эдуард Тайлор|Э. Тайлор]], который выдвинул гипотезу о том, что первоначальной формой религии был [[анимизм]]. В дальнейшем идеи Тайлора получили развитие в работах [[Фрэзер, Джеймс Джордж|Дж. Фрейзера]] ([[магия]] как первоначальная форма религии), Р. Маретта, [[Штернберг, Лев Яковлевич|Л. Я. Штернберга]] (эпоха [[аниматизм]]а, оживотворения всей природы), и [[Леви-Брюль, Люсьен|Л. Леви-Брюля]] (первобытный дологический [[мистицизм]]).
{{Further|History of religions}}
[[File:Prevailing world religions map.png|thumb|450px|A map of [[List of religious populations|major denominations and religions of the world]]]]


In the 19th and 20th centuries, the academic practice of [[comparative religion]] divided religious belief into philosophically defined categories called "world religions." Some academics [[Study of religion|studying the subject]] have divided religions into three broad categories:
Основатели [[марксизм]]а также разработали концепцию, согласно которой корнем религии является реальное практическое бессилие человека, сперва перед природными, затем перед социальными явлениями, проявляющееся в его повседневной жизни, выражающееся в том, что он не может самостоятельно обеспечить успеха своей деятельности{{sfn|Семёнов|2002}}. Также широко известно выражение «''[[опиум народа|религия есть опиум народа]]''»<ref>''«Религия — это вздох угнетённой твари, сердце бессердечного мира, подобно тому как она — дух бездушных порядков. Религия есть опиум народа»'' — ''[[Маркс, Карл|Маркс К.]], [[Энгельс, Фридрих|Энгельс Ф.]]'' Сочинения, т. 1, с. 415.</ref>.
# [[world religions]], a term which refers to [[Transculturation|transcultural]], [[international]] faiths;
# [[indigenous religions]], which refers to smaller, culture-specific or nation-specific religious groups; and
# [[new religious movements]], which refers to recently developed faiths.<ref>Harvey, Graham (2000). ''Indigenous Religions: A Companion''. (Ed: Graham Harvey). London and New York: Cassell. Page 06.</ref>


Some recent scholarship has argued that not all types of religion are necessarily separated by mutually exclusive philosophies, and furthermore that the utility of ascribing a practice to a certain philosophy, or even calling a given practice religious, rather than cultural, political, or social in nature, is limited.<ref name="pennington">Brian Kemble Pennington ''Was Hinduism Invented?'' New York: Oxford University Press US, 2005. ISBN 0-19-516655-8</ref><ref>Russell T. McCutcheon. ''Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion''. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.</ref><ref>Nicholas Lash. ''The beginning and the end of 'religion'.'' Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56635-5</ref> The current state of psychological study about the nature of religiousness suggests that it is better to refer to religion as a largely invariant phenomenon that should be distinguished from cultural norms (i.e. "religions").<ref>Joseph Bulbulia. "Are There Any Religions? An Evolutionary Explanation." ''Method & Theory in the Study of Religion'' 17.2 (2005), pp.71-100</ref>
Согласно имеющимся на данный момент сведениям о периоде [[палеолит]]а, по меньшей мере, к концу этой эпохи, древние люди развили то, что мы могли бы назвать религией или духовными отношениями. На это указывают имевшиеся у них к тому времени обычаи ритуального захоронения и [[наскальные рисунки]] в пещерах. Люди, вероятно, верили, что естественный мир населяли боги или божества, или даже, что различные объекты и места, такие, как камни или рощи, сами были живы. Религиозные верования и практики — как мы могли бы их себе вообразить — сформировали социальную структуру, как бы связывая общины и повышая эффективность их деятельности<ref name="McClellan">{{Книга | автор=McClellan|ссылка=http://books.google.com/books?id=aJgp94zNwNQC&printsec=frontcover#PPA11 | заглавие=Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction| место=Baltimore, Maryland | издательство={{нп3|Johns Hopkins University Press||en||Johns Hopkins University Press}}
| год=2006 | isbn=0801883601}} [http://books.google.ru/books?id=aJgp94zNwNQC&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q&f=false Page 11]</ref><ref>{{Книга |ссылка=http://books.google.com/books?id=3tS2MULo5rYC&pg=PA162&dq=Uniquely+Human+cognitive-linguistic+base&ei=nNUeR9fmBo74pwKwtKnMDg&sig=3UsvgAnE5B-vzb55I6W6OqqhJy4| заглавие=Uniquely Human|автор=Phillip Lieberman|isbn=0674921836| год=1991}}</ref><ref name="Kusimba 2003 285">{{Книга |ссылка=http://books.google.com/books?id=xCa5zfefWVUC&printsec=frontcover&vq=Middle+Paleolithic&rview=1&source=gbs_summary_r#PPA133,M1 |заглавие=African Foragers: Environment, Technology, Interactions |автор=Kusimba, Sibel |год=2003 |издательство=Rowman Altamira |isbn=075910154X |pages=285 }}</ref><ref name="ScienceDaily">[http://web.archive.org/web/20061209060050/http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/11/061130081347.htm World’s Oldest Ritual Discovered — Worshipped The Python 70,000 Years Ago] // ScienceDaily, 30.11.2006</ref>.


Some scholars classify religions as either ''universal religions'' that seek worldwide acceptance and actively look for new converts, or ''[[ethnic religion]]s'' that are identified with a particular ethnic group and do not seek converts.<ref name="Hinnells">{{Cite book |title=The Routledge companion to the study of religion |last=Hinnells |first=John R. |year=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-33311-3 |pages=439–440 |url=https://books.google.com/?id=IGspjXKxIf8C |accessdate=17 September 2009}}</ref> Others reject the distinction, pointing out that all religious practices, whatever their philosophical origin, are ethnic because they come from a particular culture.<ref>Timothy Fitzgerald. ''The Ideology of Religious Studies''. New York: Oxford University Press USA, 2000.</ref><ref>Craig R. Prentiss. ''Religion and the Creation of Race and Ethnicity''. New York: NYU Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8147-6701-X</ref><ref>Tomoko Masuzawa. ''The Invention of World Religions, or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. ISBN 0-226-50988-5</ref>
Некоторые из исследователей полностью отвергают мысль о существовании дорелигиозного периода, а в качестве обоснования своего взгляда утверждают, что «современной этнографии не известен ни один народ, ни одно племя, не имеющее религиозной традиции, дорелигиозное»{{sfn|Зубов|2006|с=}}.


===Demographics===
Однако другие исследователи считают, что все утверждения о том, что религия изначально присуща человеку, не выдерживают критики<ref name="Regnarmir" />. По их мнению, дорелигиозный период длился очень долго, вплоть до формирования [[неандерталец|неандертальца]]. Некоторые из них так же полагают, что признаки, свидетельствующие о наличии религиозных представлений и обрядов, становятся действительно многочисленными и убедительными лишь для периода верхнего палеолита (около 40-18 тысяч лет назад)<ref name="Regnarmir">Глава 1. Археологические памятники истории религии // ''[[Токарев, Сергей Александрович|Токарев С. А.]]'' Религия в истории народов мира. — М.: [[Политиздат]], 1964. — 559 с.</ref>. С определением времени возникновения религиозных обычаев тесно связана проблема определения различия и разграничения первобытных «формирующихся людей» ([[архантроп]]ов и [[палеоантроп]]ов) и первобытных людей современного физического типа (неоантропов, [[Homo sapiens]]), к которым принадлежали люди верхнего палеолита, именуемые обычно [[кроманьонец|кроманьонцами]]<ref>[http://www.verigi.ru/?book=210&chapter=4 Глава 1 / Проблема дорелигиозной эпохи] // ''[[Угринович, Дмитрий Модестович|Угринович Д. М.]]'' Искусство и религия. — М.: [[Политиздат]], [[1982]].</ref>.
The five largest religious groups by world population, estimated to account for 5.8 billion people and 84% of the population, are Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism (with the relative numbers for Buddhism and Hinduism dependent on the extent of [[syncretism]]) and traditional folk religion.


{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:800px;"
== Религия и общество ==
|+
{{основная статья|Религия и общество}}
|- style="background:#666688;"
В статье рассматриваются следующие вопросы:
! style="width:250px;"| Five largest religions
* [[Религия и общество#Религия и наука|Религия и наука]] (в том числе религиозная вера у учёных, религия и уровень образованности)
! style="width:170px;"| 2010 (billion)<ref name="EB2012">{{cite web |url=http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/ |title=The Global Religious Landscape |accessdate=18 December 2012}}</ref>
* [[Религия и общество#Религия и преступность|Религия и преступность]]
! style="width:160px;"| 2010 (%)
* [[Религия и общество#Религия и здоровье|Религия и здоровье]]
! style="width:180px;"| 2000 (billion)<ref name="EB2000">{{cite web |last=Turner |first=Darrell J. |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/715463/Religion-Year-In-Review-2000 |title=Religion: Year In Review 2000 |work=Encyclopedia Britannica |accessdate=16 June 2012}}</ref><ref>but cf: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/#religions</ref>
* [[Религия и общество#Религия и социальное благополучие|Религия и социальное благополучие]]
! style="width:160px;"| 2000 (%)
* [[Религия и общество#Религия и политика|Религия и политика]].
! style="width:200px;"| Demographics
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Christianity]]
| 2.2
| 32%
| 2.0
| 33%
| [[Christianity by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Islam]]
| 1.6
| 23%
| 1.2
| 19.6%
| [[List of countries by Muslim population|Islam by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Hinduism]]
| 1.0
| 15%
| 0.811
| 13.4%
| [[Hinduism by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Buddhism]]
| 0.5
| 7%
| 0.360
| 5.9%
| [[Buddhism by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Folk religion]]
| 0.4
| 6%
| 0.385
| 6.4%
|
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| Total
| 5.8
| 84%
| 4.8
| 78.3%
|
|}


A global poll in 2012 surveyed 57 countries and reported that 59% of the world's population identified as religious, 23% as [[irreligion|not religious]], 13% as "convinced [[atheism|atheists]]", and also a 9% decrease in identification as "religious" when compared to the 2005 average from 39 countries.<ref name="gia">{{cite web |url= http://www.wingia.com/web/files/richeditor/filemanager/Global_INDEX_of_Religiosity_and_Atheism_PR__6.pdf |title= Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism |publisher=WIN-Gallup International |date=27 July 2012 |accessdate= 24 August 2012}}</ref> A follow up poll in 2015 found that 63% of the globe identified as religious, 22% as not religious, and 11% as "convinced atheists".<ref name=GallupInt2015>{{cite web|title=Losing our Religion? Two Thirds of People Still Claim to be Religious|url=http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/290/file/290.pdf|website=WIN/Gallup International|publisher=WIN/Gallup International|date=13 April 2015}}</ref> On average, women are "more religious" than men.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.livescience.com/7689-women-religious-men.html|title=Women More Religious Than Men|work=Livescience.com|date=|accessdate=14 July 2013}}</ref> Some people follow multiple religions or multiple religious principles at the same time, regardless of whether or not the religious principles they follow traditionally allow for [[syncretism]].<ref>Soul Searching:The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers - Page 77, Christian Smith, Melina Lundquist Denton - 2005</ref><ref>Christ in Japanese Culture: Theological Themes in Shusaku Endo's Literary Works, Emi Mase-Hasegawa - 2008
== Религия и мораль ==
</ref><ref>
{{основная статья|Мораль#Мораль и религия}}
[http://www.christianpost.com/news/new-poll-reveals-how-churchgoers-mix-eastern-new-age-beliefs-42215/ New poll reveals how churchgoers mix eastern new age beliefs] retrieved 26 July 2013
</ref>


===Abrahamic===
== Религии и верования мира ==
[[File:Molnár Ábrahám kiköltözése 1850.jpg|upright|thumb|The patriarch [[Abraham]] (by [[József Molnár (painter)|József Molnár]])]]
{{основная статья|Список религий}}
[[Abrahamic religions]] are [[monotheistic]] religions which believe they descend from [[Abraham]].
[[Файл:Map of state religions.svg|thumb|400 px|Государства с официальными религиями
{{legend|#EBCF16|[[Буддизм]]}}
{{legend|#158706|[[Ислам]]}}
{{legend|#2FEB16|[[Шииты|Шиитский ислам]]}}
{{legend|#0F5D05|[[Сунниты|Суннитский ислам]]}}
{{legend|#0774F1|[[Православие]]}}
{{legend|#062A87|[[Протестантизм]] и [[Англиканство]]}}
{{legend|#04E3F1|[[Католицизм]]}}]]
<imagemap>
Файл: ReligijneSymbole.svg|thumb|[[Религиозные символы]]
rect 0 0 300 300 [[Христианство]]
rect 300 0 600 300 [[Иудаизм]]
rect 600 0 900 300 [[Индуизм]]
rect 900 0 1200 300 [[Бахаи]]


====Judaism====
rect 0 300 300 600 [[Ислам]]
[[File:Open Torah and pointer.jpg|thumb|upright|The [[Torah]] is the primary sacred text of Judaism.]]
rect 300 300 600 600 [[Фетишизм]]
[[Judaism]] is the oldest Abrahamic religion, originating in the people of [[History of ancient Israel and Judah|ancient Israel and Judea]]. The [[Torah]] is its foundational text, and is part of the larger text known as the [[Tanakh]] or [[Hebrew Bible]]. It is supplemented by oral tradition, set down in written form in later texts such as the [[Midrash]] and the [[Talmud]]. Judaism includes a wide corpus of texts, practices, theological positions, and forms of organization. Within Judaism there are a variety of movements, most of which emerged from [[Rabbinic Judaism]], which holds that God revealed his laws and [[613 Mitzvot|commandments]] to [[Moses]] on [[Biblical Mount Sinai|Mount Sinai]] in the form of both the [[Torah|Written]] and [[Oral Torah]]; historically, this assertion was challenged by various groups. The [[Jewish people]] were scattered after the destruction of the [[Temple in Jerusalem]] in 70 CE. Today there are about 13 million Jews, about 40 per cent living in Israel and 40 per cent in the United States.<ref>http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton61/st02_27.pdf</ref> The largest [[Jewish religious movements]] are [[Orthodox Judaism]] ([[Haredi Judaism]] and [[Modern Orthodox Judaism]]), [[Conservative Judaism]] and [[Reform Judaism]].
rect 600 300 900 600 [[Даосизм]]
rect 900 300 1200 600 [[Синтоизм]]


====Christianity====
rect 0 600 300 900 [[Буддизм]]
[[File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd Portrait cropped.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Jesus]] is the central figure of Christianity.]]
rect 300 600 600 900 [[Сикхизм]]
[[Christianity]] is based on the life and teachings of [[Jesus of Nazareth]] (1st century) as presented in the [[New Testament]]. The Christian faith is essentially faith in Jesus as the [[Christ]], the [[Son of God]], and as [[Messiah|Savior]] and Lord. Almost all Christians believe in the [[Trinity]], which teaches the unity of [[God the Father|Father]], [[God the Son|Son]] (Jesus Christ), and [[Holy Spirit]] as three persons in [[monotheism|one Godhead]]. Most Christians can describe their faith with the [[Nicene Creed]]. As the religion of [[Byzantine Empire]] in the first millennium and of [[Western Europe]] during the time of colonization, Christianity has been propagated throughout the world. The main divisions of Christianity are, according to the number of adherents:
rect 900 600 1200 900 [[Джайнизм]]
* [[Catholic Church]], headed by the [[Pope]] in [[Rome]], is a [[Communion (Christian)|communion]] of the [[Latin Church|Western church]] and 22&nbsp;[[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Catholic churches]].
rect 0 900 300 1200 [[Айявари]]
* [[Eastern Christianity]], which include [[Eastern Orthodoxy]], [[Oriental Orthodoxy]], and the [[Church of the East]].
* [[Protestantism]], separated from the Catholic Church in the 16th-century [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]] and is split into many [[Religious denomination|denominations]].


There are also smaller groups, including:
default [[Файл:ReligijneSymbole.svg]]
* [[Restorationism]], the belief that Christianity should be restored (as opposed to reformed) along the lines of what is known about the [[Apostolic Age|apostolic early church]].
</imagemap>
* [[Latter Day Saint movement]], founded by [[Joseph Smith]] in the late 1820s.
* [[Jehovah's Witnesses]], founded in the late 1870s by [[Charles Taze Russell]].


====Islam====
=== Архаические верования и обряды ===
[[File:Kaaba mirror edit jj.jpg|upright|thumb|[[Muslim]]s [[Tawaf|circumambulating]] the [[Kaaba]], the most sacred site in [[Islam]]]]
[[Islam]] is based on the [[Quran]], one of the [[Islamic holy books|holy books]] considered by Muslims to be [[Wahy|revealed]] by [[God in Islam|God]], and on the [[Hadith|teachings (hadith)]] of the [[Prophets of Islam|Islamic prophet]] [[Muhammad]], a major political and religious figure of the 7th century CE. Islam is the most widely practiced religion of [[Southeast Asia]], [[North Africa]], [[Western Asia]], and [[Central Asia]], while Muslim-majority countries also exist in parts of [[South Asia]], [[Sub-Saharan Africa]], and [[Southeast Europe]]. There are also several [[Islamic republic]]s, including [[Iran]], [[Pakistan]], [[Mauritania]], and [[Afghanistan]].
* [[Sunni Islam]] is the largest denomination within Islam and follows the Quran, the hadiths which record the [[sunnah]], whilst placing emphasis on the [[sahabah]].
* [[Shia Islam]] is the second largest denomination of Islam and its adherents believe that [[Ali]] succeeded Muhammad and further places emphasis on Muhammad's family.
* [[Ahmadiyya]] adherents believe that the awaited Imam [[Mahdi]] and the Promised Messiah has arrived, believed to be [[Mirza Ghulam Ahmad]] by Ahmadis.
*There are also Muslim revivalist movements such as [[Muwahhidism]] and [[Salafism]].


Other denominations of Islam include [[Nation of Islam]], [[Ibadi]], [[Sufism]], [[Quranism]], [[Mahdavia]], and [[non-denominational Muslims]]. [[Wahhabism]] is the dominant Muslim [[Maddhab|schools of thought]] in the [[Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]].
==== Магия ====
{{основная статья|Магия}}
Магия — понятие, используемое для описания системы мышления, при которой человек обращается к тайным силам с целью влияния на события, а также реального или кажущегося воздействия на состояние материи<ref name="Britannica">{{cite web|author=Karen Louise Jolly|url=http://www.britannica.com/print/topic/356655|title=Magic|work=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHqQVLR|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref>; символическое действие или бездействие, направленное на достижение определённой цели [[сверхъестественное|сверхъестественным]] путём<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ethnonet.ru/etnografiya/religioznye-verovanija-predpolagaemyj-genezis-i/|title=Религиозные верования. Предполагаемый генезис и история.|author=[[Марков, Геннадий Евгеньевич|Марков Г. Е.]]|work=Этножурнал|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHrI2LQ|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref>.


==== Тотемизм ====
====Other====
The [[Bahá'í Faith]] is an Abrahamic religion founded in 19th century Iran and since then has spread worldwide. It teaches unity of all religious philosophies and accepts all of the prophets of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as additional prophets including its founder [[Bahá'u'lláh]]. One of its divisions is the [[Orthodox Bahá'í Faith]].
{{основная статья|Тотемизм}}
Тотемизм многие атеистически настроенные исследователи рассматривают как одну из древнейших и универсальных религий первобытного человечества. Следы тотемизма можно найти во всех религиях и даже в обрядах, сказках и мифах.
Тотемизм — представление о связи человека с окружающим миром, предполагающее воображаемый родственный союз с тем или иным природным объектом — [[тотем]]ом: животным, растением, неодушевлённым предметом, природным явлением<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/text/19279617/|title=Тотемизм|author=|work=|publisher=Федеральный образовательный портал — экономика, социология, менеджмент|deadlink=404}}</ref>.


Smaller regional Abrahamic groups also exist, including [[Samaritanism]] (primarily in Israel and the West Bank), the [[Rastafari movement]] (primarily in Jamaica), and [[Druze]] (primarily in Syria and Lebanon).
==== Анимизм ====
{{основная статья|Анимизм}}
В основе находится вера в [[дух (мифология)|духов]] и потусторонние существа и одушевленность всей природы.


==== Фетишизм ====
===East Asian religions===
{{Main article|East Asian religions}}
{{основная статья|Религиозный фетишизм}}
East Asian religions (also known as Far Eastern religions or Taoic religions) consist of several religions of East Asia which make use of the concept of Tao (in Chinese) or Dō (in Japanese or Korean). They include:
Вера в предметы, обладающие различными сверхъестественными силами.
* [[Taoism]] and [[Confucianism]], as well as Korean, Vietnamese, and Japanese religion influenced by Chinese thought.
* [[Chinese folk religion]]: the indigenous religions of the [[Han Chinese]], or, by [[metonymy]], of all the populations of the [[Chinese cultural sphere]]. It includes the syncretism of [[Confucianism]], [[Taoism]] and [[Buddhism]], [[Wuism]], as well as many new religious movements such as [[Chen Tao (True Way Cult)|Chen Tao]], [[Falun Gong]] and [[Yiguandao]].
* Other folk and new religions of [[East Asia]] and [[Southeast Asia]] such as [[Korean shamanism]], [[Chondogyo]], and [[Jeung San Do]] in Korea; [[Shinto]], [[Shugendo]], [[Ryukyuan religion]], and [[Japanese new religions]] in Japan; [[Satsana Phi]] in Laos; [[Cao Đài]], [[Hòa Hảo]], and [[Vietnamese folk religion]] in Vietnam.


==== Аниматизм ====
===Indian religions===
[[File:Rama, Lakshman and Sita at the Kalaram Temple, Nashik..jpg|upright|thumb|[[Hindu]] statue of [[Lord Rama]] in Kalaram Temple ([[India]])]]
Вера в безличную одушевлённость природы или отдельных её частей и явлений.
[[File:Astasahasrika Prajnaparamita Dharmacakra Discourse.jpeg|thumb|upright|The [[Buddha]], in a [[Sanskrit]] manuscript, [[Nalanda|Nālandā]], Bihar, India]]
[[Indian religions]] are practiced or were founded in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. They are sometimes classified as the ''dharmic religions'', as they all feature [[dharma]], the specific law of reality and duties expected according to the religion.<ref>{{cite book |last=Mittal |first=Sushil |title=Surprising Bedfellows: Hindus and Muslims in Medieval and Early Modern India |year=2003 |publisher=Lexington Books |isbn=9780739106730 |page=103}}</ref>


[[Hinduism]] is a [[synecdoche]] describing the similar philosophies of [[Vaishnavism]], [[Shaivism]], and [[Hindu denominations|related groups]] practiced or founded in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. Concepts most of them share in common include [[karma]], [[caste]], [[reincarnation]], [[mantra]]s, [[yantra]]s, and [[darśana]].<ref group=note>Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition" etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Gavin Flood (2003), pp. 1-17. [[René Guénon]] in his'' [[Introduction to the Study of the Hindu doctrines]]'' (1921 ed.), Sophia Perennis, ISBN 0-900588-74-8, proposes a definition of the term "religion" and a discussion of its relevance (or lack of) to Hindu doctrines (part II, chapter 4, p. 58).</ref> Hinduism is the most ancient of still-active religions,<ref>P. 484 ''Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions'' By Wendy Doniger, M. Webster, Merriam-Webster, Inc</ref><ref>P. 219 ''Faith, Religion & Theology'' By Brennan Hill, Paul F. Knitter, William Madges</ref> with origins perhaps as far back as prehistoric times.<ref>P. 6 ''The World's Great Religions'' By Yoshiaki Gurney Omura, Selwyn Gurney Champion, Dorothy Short</ref> Hinduism is not a monolithic religion but a religious category containing dozens of separate philosophies amalgamated as [[Sanātana Dharma]], which is the name by which Hinduism has been known throughout history by its followers.
==== Шаманизм ====
{{основная статья|Шаманизм}}
Взаимодействие с миром духов. Связь, которую осуществляет [[шаман]].


[[Jainism]], taught primarily by [[Parsva]] (9th century BCE) and [[Mahavira]] (6th century BCE), is an ancient Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence for all forms of living beings in this world. Jains are found mostly in India.
=== Религиозный синкретизм античного мира ===


[[Buddhism]] was founded by [[Gautama Buddha|Siddhattha Gotama]] in the 6th century BCE. Buddhists generally agree that Gotama aimed to help [[Sentient beings (Buddhism)|sentient beings]] end their [[dukkha|suffering (dukkha)]] by understanding the [[dharma|true nature of phenomena]], thereby escaping the cycle of suffering and rebirth ([[Saṃsāra (Buddhism)|saṃsāra]]), that is, achieving [[Nirvana (Buddhism)|nirvana]].
==== [[Древнеегипетская религия|Религия Древнего Египта]] ====
* [[Theravada]] Buddhism, which is practiced mainly in [[Sri Lanka]] and Southeast Asia alongside folk religion, shares some characteristics of Indian religions. It is based in a large collection of texts called the [[Pali Canon]].
Религия [[Древний Египет|древних египтян]] зародилась в первобытнородовых общинах и прошла за 3000 лет длительный путь развития до сложных теологических систем Востока: от фетишизма и тотемизма, до [[политеизм]]а и'' монотеистического'' мышления — признание единого культа бога [[Атон]]а, появились [[теогония]] и [[космогония]], культ, разнообразные мифы, представления о загробной жизни, организации [[клир]]а ([[Жречество Древнего Египта|жречество]]) и его положения в обществе, [[обожествление]] [[фараон]]а и т. д.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pero-maat.ru/tradiz.htm|title=Священные традиции Древнего Египта|author=|work=Новости Египтологии|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHs26pT|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref>
* [[Mahayana]] Buddhism (or the "Great Vehicle") under which are a multitude of doctrines that became prominent [[Buddhism in China|in China]] and are still relevant [[Buddhism in Vietnam|in Vietnam]], [[Buddhism in Korea|Korea]], [[Buddhism in Japan|Japan]] and to a lesser extent [[Buddhism in the West|in Europe and the United States]]. Mahayana Buddhism includes such disparate teachings as [[Zen]], [[Pure Land Buddhism|Pure Land]], and [[Soka Gakkai]].
* [[Vajrayana]] Buddhism first appeared in India in the 3rd century CE.<ref>Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony (2000), Buddhist Thought: A complete introduction to the Indian tradition, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-18593-5 p=194</ref> It is currently most prominent in the Himalaya regions<ref>Smith, E. Gene (2001). Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature of the Himalayan Plateau. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-179-3</ref> and extends across all of Asia<ref>''Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary'', ISBN 4-7674-2015-6</ref> (cf. [[Mikkyō]]).
* Two notable new Buddhist sects are [[Hòa Hảo]] and the [[Dalit Buddhist movement]], which were developed separately in the 20th century.


[[File:GuruNanakFresco-Goindwal.jpg|thumb|170px|Fresco of [[Guru Nanak]] at [[Goindwal Sahib]] [[Gurdwara]]]]
В Египте была впервые сформулирована концепция единобожия во время правления фараона [[Эхнатон]]а. Этот фараон предпринял попытку религиозной реформы, целью которой было централизовать египетские культы вокруг бога Солнца, [[Атон]]а. Идея не прижилась, во многом по причине неудачного правления Эхнатона.
[[Sikhism]] is a monotheistic religion founded on the teachings of [[Guru Nanak]] and ten successive [[Sikh gurus]] in 15th century [[Punjab region|Punjab]]. It is the [[Major religious groups|fifth-largest]] organized religion in the world, with approximately 30 million Sikhs.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sikhism: What do you know about it?|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/sikhism-what-do-you-know-about-it/2012/08/06/19131ef6-dff1-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_gallery.html|accessdate=13 December 2012|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Zepps |first=Josh |title=Sikhs in America: What You Need To Know About The World's Fifth-Largest Religion |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/sikhs-in-america_n_1748125.html |accessdate=13 December 2012 |newspaper=Huffington Post |date=6 August 2012}}</ref> [[Sikh]]s are expected to embody the qualities of a ''Sant-Sipāhī''—a saint-soldier, have control over one's internal [[Five Thieves|vices]] and be able to be constantly immersed in virtues clarified in the [[Guru Granth Sahib]]. The principal beliefs of Sikhi are faith in ''[[Waheguru]]''—represented by the phrase ''[[ik Onkar|ik ōaṅkār]]'', meaning one God, who prevails in everything, along with a [[praxis (process)|praxis]] in which the Sikh is enjoined to engage in social reform through the pursuit of justice for all human beings.


===Local religions===
==== Религии Древней Греции и Рима ====
{{основная статья|Древнегреческая мифология|Древнеримская религия}}
Одной из самых сложных и тщательно разработанных систем политеистического мировоззрения была религия [[Древняя Греция|древней Греции]] и [[Древний Рим|древнего Рима]].


====Indigenous and folk====
У древних греков существовал многочисленный, но строго очерченный [[Пантеон (боги)|пантеон]] человекоподобных богов ([[Зевс]], [[Аполлон (мифология)|Аполлон]], [[Афродита]] и т. д.) и [[полубог]]ов (героев), и внутри этого пантеона существовала жёсткая [[иерархия]]. Древнегреческие боги и полубоги ведут себя так же, как ведут себя люди, и, в зависимости от их поступков, происходят те или иные события.
[[File:Chinese temple incence burner.jpg|right|thumb|upright|[[Incense]] burner in China]]
[[Indigenous religions]] or [[ethnic religion|folk religions]] refers to a broad category of traditional religions that can be characterised by [[shamanism]], [[animism]] and [[ancestor worship]], where ''traditional'' means "indigenous, that which is aboriginal or foundational, handed down from generation to generation…".<ref>J. O. Awolalu (1976) [http://www.studiesincomparativereligion.com/uploads/ArticlePDFs/268.pdf What is African Traditional Religion?] Studies in Comparative Religion Vol. 10, No. 2. (Spring, 1976).</ref> These are religions that are closely associated with a particular group of people, ethnicity or tribe; they often have no formal creeds or sacred texts.<ref name="pew global">Pew Research Center (2012) [http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape.aspx The Global Religious Landscape. A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups as of 2010]. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.</ref> Some faiths are [[syncretic]], fusing diverse religious beliefs and practices.<ref name="CIA">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2122.html |title=Religions |author=Central Intelligence Agency |work=World Factbook |accessdate=3 January 2013}}</ref>


* [[Australian Aboriginal mythology|Australian Aboriginal religions]].
Антропоморфная сущность богов естественным образом предполагает, что добиться их благосклонности можно материальными средствами — подарками (в том числе человеческими и иными жертвами), уговорами (то есть обратиться к ним с [[молитва|молитвой]], которая, в том числе, может иметь характер самовосхваления или даже обмана) или особыми поступками.
* Folk religions of the Americas: [[Native American religion]]s


Folk religions are often omitted as a category in surveys even in countries where they are widely practiced, e.g. in China.<ref name="pew global" />
=== Авраамические религии ===
{{основная статья|Авраамические религии}}
Праотец [[Авраам]] из [[Тора|Пятикнижия]] считается основателем традиции, получившей отражение и развитие в иудаизме, христианстве и исламе.


==== Иудаизм ====
====African traditional====
[[File:Brooklyn Museum 1992.133.4 Figure of Shango on Horseback.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Shango]], the [[Orisha]] (god) of fire, lightning, and thunder, in the [[Yoruba religion]], depicted on horseback]]
'''[[Иудаизм]]''' формировался, по меньшей мере, с ХIХ в. до н. э. на территории [[Египет|Египта]] и [[Палестина|Палестины]] ([[Земля Израильская|Земли Израильской]]). Иудаизм провозгласил [[монотеизм]], углублённый учением о сотворении человека Богом по Своему образу и подобию. Эта религия включает в религиозную сферу все стороны жизни человека. Иудей — это одновременно и религиозная, и национальная принадлежность, и обязательство следовать своду предписаний, которые определяют всю повседневную жизнь человека ([[Галаха]]). Иудаизм лишён некоторых необходимых для мировой религии черт: подавляющее большинство [[вера|верующих]] принадлежит к нему от рождения, но в иудаизм можно перейти, для этого достаточно пройти [[гиюр]].
{{Main article|Traditional African religion}}
{{Further|African diasporic religions}}
[[Traditional African religion|African traditional religion]] encompasses the traditional religious beliefs of people in Africa. In north Africa, these religions have included [[traditional Berber religion]], [[ancient Egyptian religion]], and [[Waaq]]. West African religions include [[Akan religion]], [[Dahomey mythology|Dahomey (Fon) mythology]], [[Efik mythology]], [[Odinani]] of the [[Igbo people]], [[Serer religion]], and [[Yoruba religion]], while [[Bushongo mythology]], [[Mbuti mythology|Mbuti (Pygmy) mythology]], [[Lugbara mythology]], [[Dinka religion]], and [[Lotuko mythology]] come from central Africa. Southern African traditions include [[Akamba mythology]], [[Masai mythology]], [[Malagasy mythology]], [[San religion]], [[Lozi mythology]], [[Tumbuka mythology]], and [[Zulu mythology]]. [[Bantu mythology]] is found throughout central, southeast, and southern Africa.


There are also notable [[African diasporic religions]] practiced in the Americas, such as [[Santeria]], [[Candomble]], [[Haitian Vodun|Vodun]], [[Lucumi religion|Lucumi]], [[Umbanda]], and [[Macumba]].
==== Христианство ====
'''[[Христианство]]''' возникло в I веке н. э. в [[Палестина|Палестине]], находившейся на тот момент под властью [[Римская империя|Римской империи]], первоначально в среде евреев, в контексте мессианских движений ветхозаветного иудаизма. Уже в первые десятилетия своего существования христианство получило распространение и в других провинциях и среди других этнических групп. Для христианства «нет ни [[эллин]]а, ни иудея» (Гал. 3, 28), в том смысле, что христианином может быть любой, вне зависимости от его национальной принадлежности. Потому, в отличие от иудаизма, являющегося национальной религией, христианство стало [[мировая религия|мировой религией]].


====Iranian====
Одним из самых важных нововведений христианства следует считать веру в действительное — а не кажущееся или мнимое — вочеловечение Бога и в [[Спасение (христианство)|спасительность]] Его [[Искупительная жертва#В Новом Завете|жертвенной смерти]] и [[Воскресение Иисуса Христа|воскресения]]. Вочеловечивание Бога происходит в [[Иисус Христос|Иисусе Христе]], как осуществление [[Ветхозаветные пророчества о Христе|ветхозаветных пророчеств]].
[[File:Maneckji Sett Agiary entrance.jpg|upright|thumb|[[Zoroastrian]] [[Fire Temple]]]]
[[Iranian religions]] are ancient religions whose roots predate the [[Islamization]] of [[Greater Iran]]. Nowadays these religions are practiced only by minorities.


[[Zoroastrianism]] is based on the teachings of prophet [[Zoroaster]] in the 6th century BC. Zoroastrians worship the [[Creator deity|creator]] [[Ahura Mazda]]. In Zoroastrianism good and evil have distinct sources, with evil trying to destroy the creation of Mazda, and good trying to sustain it.
В христианстве присутствует ряд религиозных предписаний, характерных и для иудаизма («[[Десять заповедей]]», «[[Заповеди любви]]», «[[Золотое правило нравственности]]»). Однако благодаря представлению о [[Благодать|благодати]] христианство сняло со своих последователей множество других, менее значимых религиозных ограничений (''бремена неудобоносимые''). Диалектика «закона» и «благодати», «страха Божьего» и «любви» продолжает оставаться актуальной для христианства на протяжении всей его истории, принимая разные формы («[[Слово о законе и благодати]]», «[[Либеральное христианство]]», «[[Фундаментализм]]»).


[[Mandaeism]] is a [[monotheistic]] religion with a strongly [[Dualism|dualistic]] worldview. Mandaeans are sometime labeled as the "Last [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]".
==== Ислам ====
'''[[Ислам]]''' возник в VII веке н. э. на [[Аравийский полуостров|Аравийском полуострове]], где в ту пору царствовало [[язычество]]. Многие религиоведы (см. [[Люксенберг, Кристоф]]) склонны утверждать, что [[Мухаммед]] многое позаимствовал из иудаизма и христианства. Хотя к VII веку н. э. христианство уже распространилось на огромную территорию, включая и южное побережье [[Средиземное море|Средиземного моря]], на территории Аравийского полуострова его последователи были не очень многочисленны. Единственное христианское царство — [[Йемен]] — которым на момент рождения Мухаммада правили эфиопы-[[монофизитство|монофизиты]], и то в период становления ислама перешло под власть персов-[[маздеизм|маздеанцев]]. Впрочем, кланы и племена Аравии жили бок о бок с евреями и христианами на протяжении нескольких веков, и были хорошо знакомы с идеей монотеизма. Так, [[Варака ибн Навфаль|Варака]], двоюродный брат Хадиджи, жены Мухаммеда, был христианином. Монотеисты или люди с монотеистическими наклонностями были известны как «ханифы». Считалось, что они следуют религии [[Авраам]]а. Ислам признаёт в качестве пророков основателей всех предыдущих монотеистических религий.


[[Religion in Kurdistan|Kurdish religions]] include the traditional beliefs of the [[Yazidi]], [[Alevi]], and [[Ahl-e Haqq]]. Sometimes these are labeled [[Yazdânism]].
=== Индийские религии ===
{{основная статья|Индийские религии}}


===New religious movements===
Религии, возникшие на [[Индийский субконтинент|Индийском субконтиненте]]. Основной концепцией индийских религий является вера в [[дхарма|дхарму]] — универсальный закон бытия. Практически все индийские религии (за исключением [[сикхизм]]а) принимают за базовую концепцию [[Карма|кармическую]] череду перерождений. К индийским религиям относятся [[индуизм]], [[джайнизм]], [[буддизм]],[[сикхизм]] и другие.
{{Main article|New religious movement}}
* [[Japanese new religions|Shinshūkyō]] is a general category for a wide variety of religious movements founded in Japan since the 19th century. These movements share almost nothing in common except the place of their founding. The largest religious movements centered in Japan include [[Soka Gakkai]], [[Tenrikyo]], and [[Seicho-No-Ie]] among hundreds of smaller groups.
* [[Cao Đài]] is a syncretistic, monotheistic religion, established in [[Vietnam]] in 1926.
* [[Raëlism]] is a new religious movement founded in 1974 teaching that humans were created by aliens. It is numerically the world's largest [[UFO religion]].
* [[Hindu reform movements]], such as [[Ayyavazhi]], [[Swaminarayan Faith]] and [[Ananda Marga]], are examples of new religious movements within Indian religions.
* [[Unitarian Universalism]] is a religion characterized by support for a "free and responsible search for truth and meaning", and has no accepted [[creed]] or [[theology]].
* [[Noahidism]] is a monotheistic ideology based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and on their traditional interpretations within Rabbinic Judaism.
* [[Scientology]] teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature. Its method of spiritual rehabilitation is a type of counseling known as [[Auditing (Scientology)|auditing]], in which practitioners aim to consciously re-experience and understand painful or traumatic events and decisions in their past in order to free themselves of their limiting effects.
* [[Eckankar]] is a pantheistic religion with the purpose of making God an everyday reality in one's life.
* [[Wicca]] is a neo-pagan religion first popularised in 1954 by British civil servant [[Gerald Gardner (Wiccan)|Gerald Gardner]], involving the worship of a God and Goddess.
* [[Neo-Druidism|Druidry]] is a religion promoting harmony with nature, and drawing on the practices of the druids.
* [[Satanism]] is a broad category of religions that, for example, worship Satan as a deity ([[Theistic Satanism]]) or use "Satan" as a symbol of carnality and earthly values ([[LaVeyan Satanism]]).


[[Sociological classifications of religious movements]] suggest that within any given religious group, a community can resemble various types of structures, including "churches", "denominations", "sects", "cults", and "institutions".
=== Мировые религии ===
{{основная статья|Мировая религия}}


===Interfaith cooperation===
Под мировыми религиями принято понимать [[буддизм]], [[христианство]] и [[ислам]] (указаны в порядке возникновения). Чтобы религия считалась мировой, она должна иметь весомое число последователей по всему миру и при этом не должна ассоциироваться с какой-либо [[Национальность|национальной]] или государственной общностью. Кроме того, при рассмотрении религии в качестве мировой учитывается её влияние на ход истории и масштабы распространения.
Because religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse{{Citation needed|date=July 2016}}, many religious practitioners{{who|date=July 2016}} have aimed to band together in [[interfaith]] dialogue, cooperation, and [[Religion and peacebuilding|religious peacebuilding]]. The first major dialogue was the [[Parliament of the World's Religions]] at the 1893 [[World's Columbian Exposition|Chicago World's Fair]], which affirmed "universal values" and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with [[Christian–Jewish reconciliation]] representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.{{Citation needed|date=July 2016}}


Recent interfaith initiatives include "A Common Word", launched in 2007 and focused on bringing Muslim and Christian leaders together,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://acommonword.com/|title=A Common Word Between Us and You|work=acommonword.com}}</ref> the "C1 World Dialogue",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.c1worlddialogue.com/|title=konsoleH :: Login|work=c1worlddialogue.com}}</ref> the "Common Ground" initiative between Islam and Buddhism,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://islambuddhism.com/|title=Islam and Buddhism|work=islambuddhism.com}}</ref> and a [[United Nations]] sponsored "World Interfaith Harmony Week".<ref>[http://worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com/ World Interfaith Harmony Week]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com/world-interfaith-harmony-week-resolution/|title=» World Interfaith Harmony Week UNGA Resolution A/65/PV.34|work=worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com}}</ref>
=== Распределение численности последователей по [[конфессия]]м ===
{{Main|Численность последователей основных религий}}
{{See also|Численность христиан}}
По данным христианского сайта «Laborers Together» на [[2011 год]] распределение населения Земли по религиозному признаку следующее<ref name="sgm">{{cite web|url=http://www.sent2all.com/Status%20Of%20Global%20Mission%202011.pdf|title=Status of Global Mission 2011|author=|work=|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHtEzQq|archivedate=2012-05-27 |deadlink=404}}</ref>:
[[Файл:Prevailing world religions map rus.png|thumb|450x450px|Карта демонстрирует распространение крупнейших религий мира и их основных конфессий]]
* [[христиане]] — 2,31 млрд ('''33 %''' населения Земли)
* [[мусульмане]] — 1,58 млрд ('''23 %''' населения Земли)
* исповедующие [[индуизм]] — 0,95 млрд ('''14 %''' населения Земли)
* [[буддист]]ы — 0,47 млрд ('''6,7 %''' населения Земли)
* исповедующие традиционные китайские религии — 0,46 млрд ('''6,6 %''' населения Земли)
* [[сикхи]] — 24 млн ('''0,3 %''' населения Земли)
* [[иудеи]] — 15 млн ('''0,2 %''' населения Земли)
* приверженцы местных верований — 0,27 млрд ('''3,9 %''' населения Земли)
* не религиозные — 0,66 млрд ('''9,4 %''' населения Земли)
* атеисты — 0,14 млрд ('''2 %''' населения Земли).


==Scientific study of religion==
Данные о распределении численности последователей по конфессиям по состоянию на конец XIX — начало XX вв. публиковались в статье «Религия»<ref name="ESBE"/> [[ЭСБЕ|Энциклопедического словаря Брокгауза и Ефрона]].
{{Main article|Religious studies}}


A number of disciplines study the phenomenon of religion: [[theology]], [[comparative religion]], [[history of religion]], [[evolutionary origin of religions]], [[anthropology of religion]], [[psychology of religion]], including [[neurotheology|neurosciences of religion]] and [[evolutionary psychology of religion]], [[sociology of religion]], and [[Law and Religion]].
== Религия в культуре ==
Большое количество литературных, музыкальных произведений и произведений изобразительного искусства отображают представления людей о религии и религиозных объектах.


Daniel L. Pals mentions eight classical theories of religion, focusing on various aspects of religion: [[animism]] and [[Magic (paranormal)|magic]], by E.B. Tylor and [[J.G. Frazer]]; the [[Psychoanalysis|psycho-analytic]] approach of [[Sigmund Freud]]; and further [[Emile Durkheim]], [[Karl Marx]], [[Max Weber]], [[Mircea Eliade]], [[E.E. Evans-Pritchard]], and Clifford Geertz.{{sfn|Pals|2006}}
== Критика религии ==
{{нет источников в разделе|дата=2012-06-03}}
{{См. также|Атеизм|Агностицизм|Критика ислама|Критика христианства|Критика буддизма}}
Критика религии имеет длинную историю, начиная с первого столетия до н. э. в [[Древний Рим|Древнем Риме]] и «[[De rerum natura|О природе вещей]]» [[Тит Лукреций Кар|Тита Лукреция Кара]] и продолжая до настоящего времени с приходом [[Новый атеизм|Нового атеизма]], представленного такими авторами, как [[Сэм Харрис]], [[Дэниел Деннет]], [[Ричард Докинз]], [[Кристофер Хитченс]] и [[Виктор Стенджер]].


Michael Stausberg gives an overview of contemporary theories of religion, including [[Cognitive science of religion|cognitive]] and biological approaches.{{sfn|Stausberg|2009}}
В XIX веке критика религии перешла на новый этап с выходом работы [[Чарльз Дарвин|Чарльза Дарвина]] «[[Происхождение видов]]». Последователи развили его идеи, представляя эволюцию как опровержение Божественного участия в творении и истории человечества. Основываясь на предположениях Дарвина и трудах [[Фейербах, Людвиг Андреас|Фейербаха]], [[Маркс, Карл|Маркс]] продолжил критику религии с позиций философского [[материализм]]а.


===Comparative religion===
Критики религии ([[Лео Таксиль]], [[Ярославский, Емельян Михайлович|Е. М. Ярославский]]) утверждают, что теистические религии и их [[священные книги]] не боговдохновенны, а созданы обычными людьми с целью разрешения социальных, биологических и политических проблем. И сравнивают положительные аспекты религиозных верований (душевное утешение, организация общества, поощрение чистоты нравов) с их отрицательными сторонами (суеверие, [[фанатизм]]).
{{Main article|Comparative religion}}
[[Nicholas de Lange]], Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at [[Cambridge University]], says that
{{quote|The comparative study of religions is an academic discipline which has been developed within Christian theology faculties, and it has a tendency to force widely differing phenomena into a kind of strait-jacket cut to a Christian pattern. The problem is not only that other 'religions' may have little or nothing to say about questions which are of burning importance for Christianity, but that they may not even see themselves as religions in precisely the same way in which Christianity sees itself as a religion.<ref>Nicholas de Lange, ''Judaism'', Oxford University Press, 1986</ref>}}


===Theories of religion===
Некоторые критики считают религиозные верования устаревшей формой сознания, приносящей вред для психологического и физического состояния личности (обрезание, «[[промывание мозгов]]» детям, надежда на [[Исцеление верой|исцеление болезней]] с помощью религиозной веры вместо своевременного обращения к врачам), а также вредоносной для общества (религиозные войны, терроризм, нерациональное использование ресурсов, дискриминация гомосексуалистов и женщин, сдерживание развития науки).
{{Main article|Theories of religion}}


====Origins and development====
Предметом критики могут быть также поведенческие нормы (спор о соотношении религии и морали), по тем или иным причинам не принятые в светском обществе.
[[File:Yazilikaya B 12erGruppe.jpg|thumb|250px|The [[Yazılıkaya]] sanctuary in [[Turkey]], with the twelve gods of the underworld]]
The origin of religion is uncertain. There are a number of theories regarding the subsequent origins of religious practices.


According to [[anthropologists]] John Monaghan and Peter Just, "Many of the great world religions appear to have begun as revitalization movements of some sort, as the vision of a charismatic prophet fires the imaginations of people seeking a more comprehensive answer to their problems than they feel is provided by everyday beliefs. Charismatic individuals have emerged at many times and places in the world. It seems that the key to long-term success – and many movements come and go with little long-term effect – has relatively little to do with the prophets, who appear with surprising regularity, but more to do with the development of a group of supporters who are able to institutionalize the movement."<ref>{{cite book |title=Social & Cultural Anthropology |edition= |last1=Monaghan |first1=John |last2=Just |first2=Peter |year=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-285346-2 |page=126}}</ref>
=== Религия и наука ===
Религия формулирует положения [[Космогония|космогонии]] (происхождения мира) и антропологии (происхождение человека), которые вступают в противоречие с современными научными представлениями. В связи с этим, современная наука критикует многие религиозные положения. Примером может послужить борьба сторонников [[креационизм]]а с теорией [[эволюция|эволюции]] ([[критика эволюционизма]]).


The [[development of religion]] has taken different forms in different cultures. Some religions place an emphasis on belief, while others emphasize practice. Some religions focus on the subjective experience of the religious individual, while others consider the activities of the religious community to be most important. Some religions claim to be universal, believing their [[law]]s and [[cosmology]] to be binding for everyone, while others are intended to be practiced only by a closely defined or localized group. In many places religion has been associated with public institutions such as [[education]], [[hospital]]s, the [[family]], [[government]], and [[politics|political]] hierarchies.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite book |title=Social & Cultural Anthropology |edition= |last1=Monaghan |first1=John |last2=Just |first2=Peter |year=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-285346-2 |page=124}}</ref>
Религии иногда постулируют тезисы, противоречащие или не согласующиеся с имеющимися научными представлениями о [[закон природы|законах природы]]. Чудеса, описанные во многих религиозных произведениях, могут оцениваться с точки зрения их соответствия законам природы.


Anthropologists John Monoghan and Peter Just state that, "it seems apparent that one thing religion or belief helps us do is deal with problems of human life that are significant, persistent, and intolerable. One important way in which religious beliefs accomplish this is by providing a set of ideas about how and why the world is put together that allows people to accommodate anxieties and deal with misfortune."<ref name=autogenerated1 />
Критически могут оцениваться религиозные тексты с точки зрения их соответствия современным представлениям исторической науки. Например, некоторые места в Библии светскими [[Библеистика|библеистами]] рассматривают как содержащие противоречивые или не согласующиеся между собой факты и повествования (например, разница некоторых текстовых мест и вопрос их [[герменевтика|истолкования]] между четырьмя [[Евангелие|Евангелиями]] [[Новый Завет|Нового Завета]]). Интерпретация этих мест библейскими критиками может значительно отличаться от традиционных религиозных интерпретаций богословов и апологетов. Часть богословов (либерального направления) могут соглашаться с этой критикой, в то время как другие (главным образом консервативные) в свою очередь могут критически оценивать научный уровень этой критики.


====Cultural system====
=== Критическое осмысление религиозного опыта ===
While religion is difficult to define, one standard model of religion, used in [[religious studies]] courses, was proposed by [[Clifford Geertz]], who simply called it a "cultural system".<ref>Clifford Geertz, ''Religion as a Cultural System'', 1973</ref> A critique of Geertz's model by [[Talal Asad]] categorized religion as "an [[anthropology|anthropological]] category".<ref>Talal Asad, ''The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category'', 1982.</ref> Richard Niebuhr's (1894-1962) five-fold classification of the relationship between Christ and culture, however, indicates that religion and culture can be seen as two separate systems, though not without some interplay.<ref>Richard Niebuhr, ''Christ and Culture'' (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1951) as cited by Domenic Marbaniang, "The Gospel and Culture: Areas of Conflict, Consent, and Conversion", ''Journal of Contemporary Christian'' Vol.6, No.1 (Bangalore: CFCC, Aug 2014), ISSN 2231-5233 pp.9-10</ref>
{{основная статья|Религиозный опыт}}
Существует гипотеза о том, что религиозно-мистический опыт может быть вынесен из симптоматики [[эпилепсия|эпилептических]] и других приступов, [[Шизофрения|шизоидных]] расстройств, [[деменция|деменций]], опыта [[Терминальные состояния|терминальных состояний]] или употребления галлюциногенов<ref>''Jeffrey L. Salver, M.D.; John Rabin, M.D.'' — The neural substrates of religious experience.<br />[[Галлюцинация|Галлюцинации]] могут происходить в некоторых пограничных состояниях [[Центральная нервная система|центральной нервной системы]], которые могут в свою очередь вызываться переутомлением, высокой [[Температура тела|температурой]], [[голодание]]м или неумеренным [[Пост (религия)|постом]] и другими событиями{{cite web|url=http://www.absolutology.org.ru/brain_myst.htm|title=Мозг и религиозный опыт|author=Берснев Павел|work=|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67yHtgeZT|archivedate=2012-05-27}}</ref>.


====Social constructionism====
По мнению психиатра [[Гроф, Станислав|Станислава Грофа]], экспериментировавшего с влиянием ЛСД на психику, «переживание смерти и рождения, единения со Вселенной или с Богом, столкновение с демоническими явлениями или переживание „прошлых воплощений“, наблюдаемые в ЛСД-сеансах, оказываются феноменологически неотличимыми от подобных переживаний, описанных в священных писаниях великих религий мира и тайных мистических текстах древних цивилизаций»<ref>[[Гроф, Станислав|Гроф С.]] [http://psylib.org.ua/books/grofs01/index.htm Области человеческого бессознательного]. — М.: Изд-во трансперсонального института,1994. — 278 с.</ref>. При этом Гроф так оценивает опыт, полученный в изменённых состояниях психики: «В холотропных состояниях мы переживаем вторжение других измерений бытия, которые могут быть очень интенсивными и даже ошеломляющими»<ref>''[[Гроф, Станислав|Гроф С.]]'' Космическая игра / Пер. с англ. Ольги Цветковой — М.: Изд-во Трансперсонального Института, 1997. — '''С. 16''' — 256 с.</ref>.
{{Main article|Theories about religions#Social constructionism|l1=Social constructionism}}


One modern academic theory of religion, [[social constructionism]], says that religion is a modern concept that suggests all [[spirituality|spiritual]] practice and [[worship]] follows a model similar to the [[Abrahamic religions]] as an orientation system that helps to interpret reality and define human beings.<ref name="vergote 89">Vergote, Antoine, ''Religion, belief and unbelief: a psychological study'', Leuven University Press, 1997, p. 89</ref> Among the main proponents of this theory of religion are Daniel Dubuisson, Timothy Fitzgerald, Talal Asad, and Jason Ānanda Josephson. The social constructionists argue that religion is a modern concept that developed from Christianity and was then applied inappropriately to non-Western cultures.
Разные религии по-разному относятся к поиску экстатических и мистических видений, переживаний и откровений. Не во всех религиях подобный поиск поощряется, а любой мистический опыт принимается за подтверждение истинности веры. Например, по мнению профессора [[богословие|богословия]] [[Осипов, Алексей Ильич|А. И. Осипова]], «все святые отцы и подвижники, опытные в духовной жизни, решительно предупреждают христианина о возможности впадения в т. н. [[Духовная прелесть|прелесть]], то есть в духовный самообман, при котором человек свои нервно-психические, а часто и бесовские возбуждения и порождаемые ими лжевидения принимает за откровения Божии»<ref name="Osipov"/>.


===Law===
== См. также ==
{{main article|Law and religion}}
{{Навигация
The study of law and religion is a relatively new field, with several thousand scholars involved in law schools, and academic departments including political science, religion, and history since 1980.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Witte |first1=John |year=2012 |title=The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report |url= |journal=Ecclesiastical Law Journal |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=327–354 |doi=10.1017/s0956618x12000348}}</ref> Scholars in the field are not only focused on strictly legal issues about religious freedom or non-establishment, but also study religions as they are qualified through judicial discourses or legal understanding of religious phenomena. Exponents look at canon law, natural law, and state law, often in a comparative perspective.<ref>Norman Doe, ''Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction'' (2011).</ref><ref>W. Cole Durham and Brett G. Scharffs, eds., ''Law and religion: national, international, and comparative perspectives'' (Aspen Pub, 2010).</ref> Specialists have explored themes in western history regarding Christianity and justice and mercy, rule and equity, and discipline and love.<ref>John Witte Jr. and Frank S. Alexander, eds., ''Christianity and Law: An Introduction'' (Cambridge U.P. 2008)</ref> Common topics of interest include marriage and the family<ref>John Witte Jr., ''From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition'' (1997).</ref> and human rights.<ref>John Witte, Jr., ''The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism'' (2008).</ref> Outside of Christianity, scholars have looked at law and religion links in the Muslim Middle East<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Elizabeth Mayer |first1=Ann |year=1987 |title=Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East |journal=American Journal of Comparative Law |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=127–184 |jstor=840165}}</ref> and pagan Rome.<ref>Alan Watson, ''The state, law, and religion: pagan Rome'' (University of Georgia Press, 1992).</ref>
|Тема = Религия
|Портал = Религия
|Викисловарь = религия
|Викиучебник =
|Викицитатник = Религия
|Викитека = Религия
|Викиновости = Религия
}}
* [[Атеизм]]
* [[Государственная религия]]
* [[Бог]] и [[Дьявол]]
* [[Вера]]
* [[Молитва]]
* [[Метатеология]]
* [[Поклонение]]
* [[Религиоведение]]
* [[Религиозный фанатизм]]
* [[Сверхъестественное]]
* [[Теизм]]
* [[Теология]]
* [[Философия]]
{{clear}}


Studies have focused on [[secularization]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ferrari |first1=Silvio |year=2012 |title=Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective |url= |journal=Ecclesiastical Law Journal |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=355–370 |doi=10.1017/s0956618x1200035x}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Palomino |first1=Rafael |year=2012 |title=Legal dimensions of secularism: challenges and problems |url= |journal=Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice |volume=2 |issue= |pages=208–225 }}</ref> In particular the issue of wearing religious symbols in public, such as headscarves that are banned in French schools, have received scholarly attention in the context of human rights and feminism.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bennoune |first1=Karima |year=2006 |title=Secularism and human rights: A contextual analysis of headscarves, religious expression, and women's equality under international law |url= |journal=Columbia Journal of Transnational Law |volume=45 |issue= |page=367 }}</ref>
== Примечания ==
{{примечания|2}}


==Related aspects==
== Литература ==


===Reason and science===
=== Определение религии ===
{{Main article|Faith and rationality|Relationship between religion and science|Epistemology}}
* ''Аллес Г.'' [http://religious-life.ru/2013/02/religion/ Религия] // The Encyclopedia of Religion. Macmillan Reference, 2005.
* ''Asad, Talal.'' [http://www.iupui.edu/~womrel/Rel433%20Readings/01_SearchableTextFiles/Asad_ConstructionOfReligionAnthroCategory.pdf The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category] // Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, 1993. P. 27-54. {{ref-en}}
* {{статья |автор=[[Пивоваров, Даниил Валентинович|Pivovarov D. V.]] |заглавие=On Universal Definition of Religion |оригинал= |ссылка=http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/2311/16613/1/03_Pivovarov.pdf |автор издания= |издание=[[Journal of Siberian Federal University]]. Humanities & Social Sciences |тип= |место= |издательство= |год=2015 |выпуск= |том=8 |номер=1 |страницы=52-63 |isbn= |issn= |doi= |bibcode= |arxiv= |pmid= |язык= |ref=Pivovarov |archiveurl= |archivedate=}}


[[Science]] acknowledges [[reason]], [[empiricism]], and [[evidence]]; and religions include [[revelation]], [[faith]] and [[sacredness]] whilst also acknowledging [[Philosophy of religion|philosophical]] and [[metaphysical]] explanations with regard to the study of the universe. Both science and religion are not monolithic, timeless, or static because both are complex social and cultural endeavors that have changed through time across languages and cultures.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Stenmark |first1=Mikael |title=How to Relate Science and Religion: A Multidimensional Model |date=2004 |publisher=W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. |location=Grand Rapids, Mich. |isbn=080282823X}}</ref>
=== История религии и религиоведение ===
* {{книга |автор=[[Аринин, Евгений Игоревич|Аринин Е. И.]] |заглавие=Философия религии. Принципы сущностного анализа: Монография|место=Архангельск |издательство=[[Поморский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова|Изд-во ПГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова]] |год=1998|страницы=295 |isbn=5-88086-168-6 |тираж=|ref=Аринин}}
* {{статья|автор=Баёв П. А.|ссылка=http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/socis/msg/35402580.html |заглавие=Церковь и служитель культа в медийном дискурсе отечественного социума |издание=[[Социологические исследования (журнал)|Социологические исследования]] |год=2011 |номер=2 |страницы=118—127|ref=Баёв}}
* {{книга |автор=[[Жуковский, Владимир Ильич|Жуковский В. И.]], [[Копцева, Наталья Петровна|Копцева Н. П.]], [[Пивоваров, Даниил Валентинович|Пивоваров Д. В.]] |заглавие=Визуальная сущность религии: монография|место=Красноярск|издательство=[[Красноярский государственный университет|Краснояр. гос. ун-т.]]|год=2006|страниц=460 |isbn= 5-7638-0628-X|ref=Жуковский, Копцева, Пивоваров}}
* {{книга |автор=[[Забияко, Андрей Павлович|Забияко А. П.]] |часть=Религия |ссылка часть= |заглавие=Энциклопедия религий |оригинал= |ссылка= |викитека= |ответственный=Под ред. [[Забияко, Андрей Павлович|А. П. Забияко]], [[Красников, Александр Николаевич|А. Н. Красикова]], [[Элбакян, Екатерина Сергеевна|Е. С. Элбакян]] |издание= |место=М. |издательство=[[Академический проект (московское издательство)|Академический проект]] |год=2008 |том= |страницы=1069—1073|страниц= |серия= |isbn= |тираж=|ref=Забияко}}
* {{книга |автор=[[Зубов, Андрей Борисович|Зубов А. Б.]] |заглавие=История религии. Курс лекций. Книга первая |место=М. |издательство= [[МГИМО-Университет]] |год=2006 |страниц=436 |isbn= 5-9228-0243-7|ref=Зубов}}
* {{cite web|url=http://scepsis.ru/library/id_305.html|title=Возникновение религии и её первая, исходная форма — магия|author=[[Семёнов, Юрий Иванович|Семёнов Ю. И.]]|work=[[Скепсис (журнал)|Скепсис]] № 1|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyqI7Yi|archivedate=2012-05-15|ref=Семёнов|year=2002}}
* {{cite web|url=http://scepsis.ru/library/id_372.html|title=Основные этапы эволюции первобытной религии|author=[[Семёнов, Юрий Иванович|Семёнов Ю. И.]]|work=[[Скепсис (журнал)|Скепсис]] № 2|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyqthJ9|archivedate=2012-05-15|ref=Семёнов1|year=2003}}
* {{cite web|url=http://scepsis.ru/library/id_393.html|title=Тотемизм, первобытная мифология и первобытная религия|author=[[Семёнов, Юрий Иванович|Семёнов Ю. И.]]|work=[[Скепсис (журнал)|Скепсис]] № 3|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyrT1RS|archivedate=2012-05-15|ref=Семёнов2|year=2003}}
* {{cite web|url=http://scepsis.ru/library/id_48.html|title=Религия и наука|author=[[Эйнштейн, Альберт|Эйнштейн А.]]|work=[[Скепсис (журнал)|Скепсис]]|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fys16si|archivedate=2012-05-15|ref=Эйнштейн}}
* {{книга |автор=[[Элбакян, Екатерина Сергеевна|Элбакян Е. С.]]|часть=Религия |ссылка часть= |заглавие=Философский словарь |оригинал= |ссылка= |викитека= |ответственный=Под ред. [[Фролов, Иван Тимофеевич (философ)|И. Т. Фролова]] |издание=7-е изд., перераб. и доп |место=М. |издательство=[[Республика (издательство)|Республика]] |год=2001 |том= |страницы=488 |столбцы= |страниц= |серия= |isbn= |тираж=|ref=Элбакян}}


The concepts of "science" and "religion" are a recent invention: "religion" emerged in the 17th century in the midst of colonization and globalization and the Protestant Reformation,<ref name="Harrison Territories" /><ref name=Nongbri /> "science" emerged in the 19th century in the midst of attempts to narrowly define those who studied nature,<ref name="Harrison Territories" /><ref name="Cahan Natural Philosophy">{{cite book|editor1-last=Cahan|editor1-first=David|title=From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science|date=2003|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|isbn=0226089282}}</ref><ref name="WSACM">{{cite book|editor1-last=Numbers|editor1-first=Ronald|editor2-last=Lindberg|editor2-first=David|title=When Science and Christianity Meet|date=2003|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|isbn=0226482146}}</ref> and the phrase "religion and science" emerged in the 19th century due to the reification of both concepts.<ref name="Harrison Territories"/> It was in the 19th century that the terms "Buddhism", "Hinduism", "Taoism", and "Confucianism" first emerged.<ref name="Harrison Territories" /> In the ancient and medieval world, the etymological Latin roots of both science (''scientia'') and religion (''religio'') were understood as inner qualities of the individual or virtues, never as doctrines, practices, or actual sources of knowledge.<ref name="Harrison Territories" />
=== Апологетика ===
* {{книга |ссылка часть=http://ec-dejavu.ru/r/Religion_China.html |автор=[[Маслов, Алексей Александрович|Маслов А. А.]] |часть=Религия в Китае |заглавие=Китай: Укрощение драконов. Духовные поиски и сакральный экстаз |место=СПб.|издательство=[[Алетейя]] |год=2003 |страницы=15-29. }}
* {{книга |ссылка=http://www.alexandrmen.ru/books/index.html |заглавие=История религии: В поисках Пути, Истины и Жизни |автор=[[Мень А. В.]] |место=Москва |издание=(в 7 томах) |год=1991—1992 }}
* {{книга |ссылка=http://www.alexandrmen.ru/books/histrel/histrel.html |заглавие=История религии (учебник в 2 томах) |автор=[[Мень А. В.]] |место=Москва |год=1997 }} (Том 1. В поисках Пути, Истины и Жизни. Том 2. Пути христианства)
* {{cite web|url=http://www.wco.ru/biblio/books/osip1/Main.htm|title=Путь разума в поисках истины|author=[[Осипов, Алексей Ильич|Осипов А. И.]]|work=|publisher=|year=1997|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyucx6O|archivedate=2012-05-15}}
* {{cite web|url=http://www.philosophy.ru/library/tolstoy/what_is_religion.html|title=Что такое религия и в чем сущность её?|author=[[Толстой, Лев Николаевич|Толстой Л. Н.]] Толстовский листок = Толстой и о Толстом: выпуск первый / сост.В. А. Мороз. — изд. 2-ое. — М.: Мамонтовский Дом; Музей русской народной живописи, 1995. — 116 с. — (Запрещенный Толстой). — Содерж.:|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fysadkw|archivedate=2012-05-15}}
* {{cite web|url=http://jnana.ru/science/torch.html|title=Религии мира. Опыт запредельного. Трансперсональные состояния и психотехника|author=[[Торчинов, Евгений Алексеевич|Торчинов Е. А.]]|work=|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyu0iXg|archivedate=2012-05-15}}
* ''[[Флоренский П.А.]]'' Собрание сочинений. Философия культа (опыт православной антроподицеи). — М.:[[Мысль (издательство, Москва)|Мысль]], 2004. (Серия «Философское наследие». — Т. 133).


In general the [[scientific method]] gains knowledge by testing hypotheses to develop [[theories]] through elucidation of facts or evaluation by [[experiment]]s and thus only answers [[physical cosmology|cosmological]] questions about the [[universe]] that can be observed and measured. It develops [[theory|theories]] of the world which best fit physically observed evidence. All scientific knowledge is subject to later refinement, or even rejection, in the face of additional evidence. Scientific theories that have an overwhelming preponderance of favorable evidence are often treated as ''[[de facto]]'' verities in general parlance, such as the theories of [[general relativity]] and [[natural selection]] to explain respectively the mechanisms of [[gravity]] and [[evolution]].
=== Критика ===
* White, E. D. {{cite web |url=http://englishatheist.org/white/contents.html |title=A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom |author= |work= |publisher= }}. 2 vols. ([[1896]]){{ref-en}} (на русском языке: {{книга |автор=[[Уайт, Э. Д.]] |заглавие=Борьба религии с наукой |ответственный=Пер. Д. Л. Вейса |место=М.—Л. |год=1932}})
* {{cite web|url=http://www.ftarchives.net/cassels/sr/contents.htm|title=Supernatural Religion: An Inquiry into the Reality of Divine Revelation|author={{не переведено 3|Walter Richard Cassels|Walter Richard Cassels|en}}|work=|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fyvarnp|archivedate=2012-05-15}}, London, [[1902]]. ({{cite web|url=http://www.archive.org/details/supernaturalreli02cassiala|title=в pdf, djVu|author=|work=|publisher=|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/67fywKZfX|archivedate=2012-05-15}}){{ref-en}} («Сверхъестественная религия: исследование реальности божественного откровения»)
* {{книга |ссылка=http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/DraHist.html |заглавие=History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science |автор={{не переведено 3|John William Draper|John William Draper|en}}. |место=New York |издательство=D. Appleton |год=1874}}{{ref-en}} («История борьбы между религией и наукой»)
* [[Хитченс, Кристофер|Hitchens, C. E.]] [http://evolbiol.ru/large_files/hitchens.pdf ''God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything]'' ISBN 0-446-57980-7 (на русском языке: {{книга |автор=[[Хитченс, Кристофер|Хитченс К.]] |заглавие=[[Бог — не любовь]]: Как религия всё отравляет |ответственный=Пер. с англ |место=М. |издательство=ООО «Альпина нон-фикшн» |год=2012 |страниц=365 |isbn=978-5-91671-092-2}})''


Religion does not have a method per se partly because religions emerge through time from diverse cultures and it is an attempt to find meaning in the world, and to explain humanity's place in it and relationship to it and to any posited entities. In terms of Christian theology and ultimate truths, people rely on reason, experience, scripture, and tradition to test and gauge what they experience and what they should believe. Furthermore, religious models, understanding, and metaphors are also revisable, as are scientific models.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Tolman |first1=Cynthia |title=Methods in Religion |url=http://akbar.marlboro.edu/~mahoney/vhs/SciRelCourse/Religion_methods.html |website=Malboro College}}</ref>
{{Критика религии}}


Regarding religion and science, [[Albert Einstein]] states (1940): "For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action; it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts…Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determine the goals, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up." <ref>{{cite journal |title=Personal God Concept Causes Science-Religion Conflict |journal=The Science News-Letter |date=21 September 1940 |first=Albert |last=Einstein |volume=38 |issue=12 |pages=181–182 |jstor=3916567 |doi=10.2307/3916567}}</ref>
[[Категория:Религия| ]]

[[Категория:Виды социальных институтов]]
=== Morality and Religion ===
{{Main article|Morality and religion}}

Many religions have value frameworks regarding personal behavior meant to guide adherents in determining between right and wrong. These include the [[Jainism#Core beliefs|Triple Jems of Jainism]], [[Judaism|Judaism's]] [[Halacha]], [[Islam|Islam's]] [[Sharia]], [[Catholicism|Catholicism's]] [[Canon law (Catholic Church)|Canon Law]], [[Buddhism|Buddhism's]] [[Eightfold Path]], and [[Zoroastrianism#Principal beliefs|Zoroastrianism's]] "good thoughts, good words, and good deeds" concept, among others.<ref>{{cite book|title=Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe|last=Esptein|first=Greg M.|publisher=HarperCollins|year=2010|isbn=978-0-06-167011-4|edition=|location=New York|page=117}}</ref> Religion and morality are not synonymous. Morality does not necessarily depend upon religion although this is "an almost automatic assumption."<ref name="The Elements of Moral Philosophy">{{cite book|title=The Elements of Moral Philosophy|last2=Rachels|first2=(ed) Stuart|publisher=McGraw-Hill|year=2011|isbn=0-078-03824-3|edition=7|location=New York|page=|last1=Rachels|first1=(ed) James}}</ref> According to ''The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics'', religion and morality "are to be defined differently and have no definitional connections with each other. Conceptually and in principle, morality and a religious value system are two distinct kinds of value systems or action guides."<ref>{{cite book|title=The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics|last2=Macquarrie|first2=(ed) John|publisher=The Westminster Press|year=1986|isbn=0-664-20940-8|edition=|location=Philadelphia|page=401|last1=Childress|first1=(ed) James F.}}</ref>

According to global research done by Gallup on people from 145 countries, adherents of all the major world religions who attended religious services in the past week have higher rates of generosity such as donating money, volunteering, and helping a stranger than do their coreligionists who did not attend services (non-attenders). Even for people who were nonreligious, those who said they attended religious services in the past week exhibited more generous behaviors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/122807/religious-attendance-relates-generosity-worldwide.aspx|title=Religious Attendance Relates to Generosity Worldwide|last2=Smith|first2=Buster G.|date=4 September 2009|publisher=Gallup|last1=Stark|first1=Rodney}}</ref> Another global study by Gallup on people from 140 countries showed that highly religious people are more likely to help others in terms of donating money, volunteering, and helping strangers despite them having, on average, lower incomes than those who are less religious or nonreligious.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/111013/worldwide-highly-religious-more-likely-help-others.aspx|title=Worldwide, Highly Religious More Likely to Help Others|last2=Pelham|first2=Brett|date=8 October 2008|publisher=Gallup|last1=Crabtree|first1=Steve}}</ref>

A comprehensive study by [[Harvard University]] professor [[Robert Putnam]] found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.<ref name="Relgion & Charity">{{cite web|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-05-14-church-community_N.htm|title=Religious citizens more involved -- and more scarce?|publisher=[[USA Today]]|quote=The scholars say their studies found that religious people are three to four times more likely to be involved in their community. They are more apt than nonreligious Americans to work on community projects, belong to voluntary associations, attend public meetings, vote in local elections, attend protest demonstrations and political rallies, and donate time and money to causes – including secular ones. At the same time, Putnam and Campbell say their data show that religious people are just "nicer": they carry packages for people, don't mind folks cutting ahead in line and give money to panhandlers.}}</ref><ref name="better neighbors">{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-11-15-column15_ST_N.htm|title=Religious people are 'better neighbors'|date=14 November 2010|work=[[USA Today]]|last2=Putnam|first2=Robert|quote=However, on the other side of the ledger, religious people are also "better neighbors" than their secular counterparts. No matter the civic activity, being more religious means being more involved. Take, for example, volunteer work. Compared with people who never attend worship services, those who attend weekly are more likely to volunteer in religious activities (no surprise there), but also for secular causes. The differences between religious and secular Americans can be dramatic. Forty percent of worship-attending Americans volunteer regularly to help the poor and elderly, compared with 15% of Americans who never attend services. Frequent-attenders are also more likely than the never-attenders to volunteer for school and youth programs (36% vs. 15%), a neighborhood or civic group (26% vs. 13%), and for health care (21% vs. 13%). The same is true for philanthropic giving; religious Americans give more money to secular causes than do secular Americans. And the list goes on, as it is true for good deeds such as helping someone find a job, donating blood, and spending time with someone who is feeling blue. Furthermore, the "religious edge" holds up for organized forms of community involvement: membership in organizations, working to solve community problems, attending local meetings, voting in local elections, and working for social or political reform. On this last point, it is not just that religious people are advocating for right-leaning causes, although many are. Religious liberals are actually more likely to be community activists than are religious conservatives.|accessdate=18 October 2007|first1=David|last1=Campbell}}</ref> The study revealed that forty percent of [[service of worship|worship service]] attending Americans volunteer regularly to help the poor and elderly as opposed to 15% of Americans who never attend services.<ref name="Relgion & Charity" /> Moreover, religious individuals are more likely than non-religious individuals to volunteer for school and youth programs (36% vs. 15%), a neighborhood or civic group (26% vs. 13%), and for health care (21% vs. 13%).<ref name="Relgion & Charity" /> Other research has shown similar correlations between religiosity and giving.<ref name="Brooks Giving">{{cite web|url=http://www.hoover.org/research/religious-faith-and-charitable-giving|title=Religious Faith and Charitable Giving|last=Brooks|first=Arthur}}</ref>

Religious belief appears to be the strongest predictor of charitable giving.<ref>Brooks, Arthur C. [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/?tag=content;col1 "Religious faith and charitable giving"], ''[[Policy Review]]'', Oct–Dec 2003.</ref><ref>Will, George F. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/26/AR2008032602916.html?hpid=opinionsbox1 "Bleeding Hearts but Tight Fists"], ''[[Washington Post]]'', 27 March 2008; Page A17</ref><ref name="Gose 2006">Gose, Ben. [http://www.philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htm "Charity's Political Divide"], ''[[The Chronicle of Philanthropy]]'', 23 November 2006.</ref><ref>Brooks, Arthur C. ''Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth about Compassionate Conservatism'', Basic Books, 27 November 2006. ISBN 0-465-00821-6</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2|title=Who Gives and Who Doesn't? Putting the Stereotypes to the Test|last2=Kendall|first2=Kristina|date=28 November 2006|publisher=ABC News|last1=Stossel|first1=John}}</ref> One study found that average charitable giving in 2000 by religious individuals ($2,210) was over three times that of secular individuals ($642). Giving to non-religious charities by religious individuals was $88 higher. Religious individuals are also more likely to volunteer time, donate blood, and give back money when accidentally given too much change.<ref name="Gose 2006" /> A 2007 study by the [[The Barna Group]] found that "active-faith" individuals (those who had attended a church service in the past week) reported that they had given on average $1,500 in 2006, while "no-faith" individuals reported that they had given on average $200. "Active-faith" adults claimed to give twice as much to non-church-related charities as "no-faith" individuals claimed to give. They were also more likely to report that they were registered to vote, that they volunteered, that they personally helped someone who was homeless, and to describe themselves as "active in the community."<ref>[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians "Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians"], ''The Barna Update'', [[The Barna Group]], 11 June 2007.</ref>

Some scientific studies show that the degree of religiosity is generally found to be associated with higher ethical attitudes<ref name="KERLEY, KENT R. 2005">{{cite journal|last2=Matthews|first2=Todd L.|last3=Blanchard|first3=Troy C.|year=2005|title=Religiosity, Religious Participation, and Negative Prison Behaviors|journal=Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion|volume=44|issue=4|pages=443–457|doi=10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00296.x|last1=Kerley|first1=Kent R.}}</ref><ref name="SAROGLOU, VASSILIS 2005">{{Cite journal|last2=Pichon|first2=Isabelle|last3=Trompette|first3=Laurence|last4=Verschueren|first4=Marijke|last5=Dernelle|first5=Rebecca|year=2005|title=Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings|journal=Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion|volume=44|issue=3|pages=323–348|doi=10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x|last1=Saroglou|first1=Vassilis}}</ref><ref name="Regnerus, Mark D. 2006">{{Cite journal|last2=Burdette|first2=Amy|year=2006|title=Religious Change and Adolescent Family Dynamics|journal=The Sociological Quarterly|volume=47|issue=1|pages=175–194|doi=10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00042.x|last1=Regnerus|first1=Mark D.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last2=Emerson|first2=T. L. N.|year=2004|title=Business Ethics and Religion: Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness Among Students|journal=Journal of Business Ethics|volume=50|issue=4|pages=383–396|doi=10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025040.41263.09|last1=Conroy|first1=S. J.}}</ref> — for example, surveys suggesting a positive connection between faith and altruism.<ref>e.g. [http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/datasets/social_capital_community_survey.html a survey] by [[Robert D. Putnam|Robert Putnam]] showing that membership of religious groups was positively correlated with membership of voluntary organizations</ref> Survey research suggests that believers do tend to hold different views than non-believers on a variety of social, ethical and moral questions. According to a 2003 survey conducted in the United States by [[The Barna Group]], those who described themselves as believers were less likely than those describing themselves as atheists or agnostics to consider the following behaviors morally acceptable: [[cohabitation|cohabitating]] with someone of the opposite sex outside of marriage, enjoying sexual fantasies, having an [[abortion]], sexual relationships outside of marriage, [[gambling]], looking at [[pornography|pictures of nudity or explicit sexual behavior]], getting [[drunkeness|drunk]], and "[[homosexuality|having a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex]]."<ref name="Morality Continues to Decay">[http://web.archive.org/web/20040203202833/www.barna.org/cgi-bin/PagePressRelease.asp?PressReleaseID=152&Reference=F "The Barna Update: Morality Continues to Decay" (archive copy at the] [[Internet Archive]]<span>)</span>, [[The Barna Group]], 3 November 2003 ([http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/129-morality-continues-to-decay "The Barna Update: Morality Continues to Decay" – Summary version posted on the Barna website])</ref>

=== Politics ===
Religion has a significant impact on the political system in many countries. Notably, most '''Muslim-majority countries''' adopt various aspects of [[sharia]], the Islamic law. Some countries even define themselves in religious terms, such as ''[[Iran|The Islamic Republic of Iran]]''. The sharia thus affects up to 23% of the global population, or 1.57&nbsp;billion people who are [[Muslim world|Muslims]]. However, religion also affects political decisions in many western countries. For instance, in the '''[[United States]]''', 51% of voters would be less likely to vote for a presidential candidate who did not believe in God, and only 6% more likely.<ref>[http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2016/02/economist-explains-18?cid1=cust/noenew/n/n/n/20160229n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/NA/email The Economist explains: The role of religion in America’s presidential race], ''The Economist'', 25 February 2016</ref> Christians make up 92% of members of the US Congress, compared with 71% of the general public (as of 2014). At the same time, while 23% of U.S. adults are religiously unaffiliated, only one member of Congress ([[Kyrsten Sinema]], D-Arizona), or 0.2% of that body, claims no religious affiliation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/27/10-facts-about-religion-in-america/|title=10 facts about religion in America|last=Lipka|first=Michael|date=27 Aug 2015|website=|publisher=Pew Research Center|access-date=9 July 2016}}</ref> In most '''European countries''', however, religion has a much smaller influence on politics<ref>[http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2014/04/europe-religion-and-politics Europe, religion and politics:Old world wars], The Economist, 22 April 2014</ref> although it used to be much more important. For instance, [[same-sex marriage]] and [[abortion]] were illegal in many European countries until recently, following Christian (usually [[Catholicism|Catholic]]) doctrine. Several [[List of atheists in politics and law|European leaders are atheists]] (e.g. [[France]]’s president [[François Hollande|Francois Hollande]] or Greece's prime minister [[Alexis Tsipras]]). In '''Asia''', the role of religion differs widely between countries. For instance, [[India]] is still one of the most religious countries and religion still has a strong impact on politics, given that Hindu nationalists have been targeting minorities like the Muslims and the Christians, who historically belonged to the lower castes.<ref>Lobo, L. 2000 [http://americamagazine.org/issue/276/article/religion-and-politics-india Religion and Politics in India], ''America Magazine'', 19 February 2000</ref> By contrast, countries such as [[Religion in China|China]] or [[Religion in Japan|Japan]] are largely secular and thus religion has a much smaller impact on politics.

===Economics===
[[File:Religion economy.png|thumb|400px|Average income correlates negatively with (self-defined) religiosity.<ref name="gia" />]]
{{Main article|Economics of religion}}
{{Further|Religion and business|Wealth and religion}}
One study has found there is a negative correlation between self-defined religiosity and the wealth of nations.<ref name=WIN-Gallup>{{cite web |last=WIN-Gallup |title=Global Index of religion and atheism. |url=http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf |accessdate=July 2016}}</ref> In other words, the richer a nation is, the less likely its inhabitants to call themselves "religious", whatever this word means to them.<ref name="WIN-Gallup" />

Sociologist and political economist [[Max Weber]] has argued that Protestant Christian countries are wealthier because of their [[Protestant work ethic]].<ref>Max Weber, [1904] 1920. ''[[The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]]''</ref>

According to a study from 2015, [[Christians]] hold the largest amount of wealth (55% of the total world wealth), followed by [[Muslims]] (5.8%), [[Hindus]] (3.3%) and [[Jewish]] (1.1%). According to the same study it was found that adherents under the classification [[Irreligion]] or other religions hold about 34.8% of the total global wealth.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/453467/christians-hold-largest-percentage-global.html6 |title=Christians hold largest percentage of global wealth: Report|publisher=deccanherald.com|date=2015-01-14}}</ref>

===Health===
{{Main article|Impacts of religion on health}}
[[Mayo Clinic]] researchers examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality, and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. The authors reported that: "Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide."<ref name="Religion and Medicine">{{cite web |first1=Paul S. |last1=Mueller, MD |first2=David J. |last2=Plevak, MD |first3=Teresa A. |last3=Rummans, MD |title=Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for Clinical Practice |url=http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0025-6196/PIIS0025619611627997.pdf |quote=We reviewed published studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and subject reviews that examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. We also reviewed articles that provided suggestions on how clinicians might assess and support the spiritual needs of patients. Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide |accessdate=13 November 2010}}</ref>

The authors of a subsequent study concluded that the influence of religion on health is "largely beneficial", based on a review of related literature.<ref>{{cite journal |last2=Hill |first2=Peter C. |title=The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Mental and Physical Health |journal=Current Directions in Psychological Science |date=Feb 2001 |first=Kevin S. |last=Seybold |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=21–24 |doi=10.1111/1467-8721.00106}}</ref> According to academic James W. Jones, several studies have discovered "positive correlations between religious belief and practice and mental and physical health and longevity." <ref>{{cite journal |title=Religion, Health, and the Psychology of Religion: How the Research on Religion and Health Helps Us Understand Religion |journal=Journal of Religion and Health |year=2004 |first=James W. |last=Jones |volume=43 |issue=4 |pages=317–328 |doi=10.1007/s10943-004-4299-3}}</ref>

An analysis of data from the 1998 US General Social Survey, whilst broadly confirming that religious activity was associated with better health and well-being, also suggested that the role of different dimensions of spirituality/religiosity in health is rather more complicated. The results suggested "that it may not be appropriate to generalize findings about the relationship between spirituality/religiosity and health from one form of spirituality/religiosity to another, across denominations, or to assume effects are uniform for men and women.<ref>Maselko, J. and Kubzansky, L. D. (2006) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.008 ''Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: Results from the US General Social Survey'']" ''Social Science & Medicine'', Vol 62(11), June 2848-2860.</ref>

=== Superstition ===
{{Further|Superstition|Magical thinking|Magic and religion}}
Superstition has been described as "the incorrect establishment of cause and effect" or a false conception of causation.<ref>[http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kfoster/FosterKokko2008%20Proc%20B%20superstition.pdf Kevin R. Foster and Hanna Kokko, "The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour", ''Proc. R. Soc. B'' (2009) 276, 31–37] {{wayback|df=yes|url=http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kfoster/FosterKokko2008%20Proc%20B%20superstition.pdf|date=20100728042608}}</ref> Religion is more complex and is mostly composed of social institutions and morality. But some religions may include superstitions or make use of magical thinking. Adherents of one religion sometimes think of other religions as superstition.<ref>{{Cite book |title=[[Religion Explained]] |last=Boyer |year=2001 |chapter=Why Belief |authorlink=Pascal Boyer |chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=wreF80OHTicC&pg=PA297&lpg=PA297&dq=%22fang+too+were+quite+amazed%22}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Fitzgerald|2007|page=232}}</ref>
Some [[atheists]], [[deists]], and [[skeptics]] regard religious belief as superstition.

Greek and Roman pagans, who saw their relations with the gods in political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods (''deisidaimonia''), as a slave might fear a cruel and capricious master. The Romans called such fear of the gods ''superstitio''.<ref>Veyne 1987, p 211 {{Clarify|date=September 2010}}</ref>

[[Ancient greek]] historian [[Polybius]] described ''superstition'' in [[Ancient Rome]] as an ''[[instrumentum regni]]'', an instrument of maintaining the cohesion of the [[Roman Empire|Empire]].<ref>Polybius, ''[[The Histories (Polybius)|The Histories]]'', VI 56.</ref>

The Roman Catholic Church considers superstition to be sinful in the sense that it denotes a lack of trust in the divine providence of God and, as such, is a violation of the first of the Ten Commandments. The [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] states that superstition "in some sense represents a perverse excess of religion" (para. #2110). "Superstition," it says, "is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. Matthew 23:16-22" (para. #2111)

===Secularism and atheism===
[[File:Ranjitsingh.gif|thumb|upright|[[Ranjit Singh]] established [[Ranjit Singh#Secular Sikh rule|secular rule]] over [[Punjab region|Punjab]] in the early 19th century.]]

====Secularisation====
{{Main article|Secularism| Secularization |Irreligion}}
'''Secularization''' is the transformation of a society from close identification with religious values and institutions toward nonreligious values and [[secular]] institutions. The term secularization is also used in the context of the lifting of the monastic restrictions from a member of the clergy.<ref>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/secularization</ref>

====Agnosticism and Atheism====
{{Main article|Atheism|Agnosticism|Antireligion|Humanism}}
{{See also|Criticism of atheism}}

The terms "[[atheist]]" (lack of belief in any gods) and "agnostic" (belief in the unknowability of the existence of gods), though specifically contrary to theistic (e.g. Christian, Jewish, and Muslim) religious teachings, do not by definition mean the opposite of "religious". There are religions (including Buddhism, Taoism, and Hinduism), in fact, that classify some of their followers as agnostic, atheistic, or [[nontheism|nontheistic]]. The true opposite of "religious" is the word "irreligious". [[Irreligion]] describes an absence of any religion; [[antireligion]] describes an active opposition or aversion toward religions in general.

==Criticism of religious violence==
{{main article|Criticism of religion}}

===Violence===
{{main article|Religious violence}}
{{See also|Christianity and violence|Judaism and violence|Islam and violence}}

[[File:SiegeofAntioch.jpeg|thumb|The [[Crusades]] were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between [[Christian]] [[Europe]] and [[Muslim]]s. Shown here is a battle scene from the [[First Crusade]].]]

Critics like [[Hector Avalos]]<ref>{{cite book |title=Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence |first=Hector |last=Avalos |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, New York |year=2005}}</ref> [[Regina Schwartz]],<ref name=ReginaSchwartz>{{cite book |title=The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism By Regina M. Schwartz |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1998}}</ref> [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Richard Dawkins]] have argued that religions are inherently violent and harm to society by using violence to promote their goals, in ways that are endorsed and exploited by their leaders.<ref name="Hitchens 2007">{{Cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=God is not Great |publisher=Twelve |year=2007}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}<ref name="Dawkins 2006">{{Cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=The God Delusion |publisher=Bantam Books |year=2006}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}

Anthropologist Jack David Eller asserts that religion is not inherently violent, arguing "religion and violence are clearly compatible, but they are not identical." He asserts that "violence is neither essential to nor exclusive to religion" and that " virtually every form of religious violence has its nonreligious corollary."<ref name="CruelCreeds1">{{cite book |last=Eller |first=Jack David |title=Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence: Religious Violence Across Culture and History |year=2010 |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-1-61614-218-6 |quote=As we have insisted previously, religion is not inherently and irredeemably violent; it certainly is not the essence and source of all violence.}}</ref><ref name="CruelCreeds2">{{cite book |last=Eller |first=Jack David |title=Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence: Religious Violence Across Culture and History |year=2010 |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-1-61614-218-6 |quote=Religion and violence are clearly compatible, but they are not identical. Violence is one phenomenon in human (and natural existence), religion is another, and it is inevitable that the two would become intertwined. Religion is complex and modular, and violence is one of the modules—not universal, but recurring. As a conceptual and behavioral module, violence is by no means exclusive to religion. There are plenty of other groups, institutions, interests, and ideologies to promote violence. Violence is, therefore, neither essential to nor exclusive to religion. Nor is religious violence all alike... And virtually every form of religious violence has its nonreligious corollary.}}</ref>

=== Animal Sacrifice ===
Done by some (but not all) religions, animal sacrifice is the [[ritual]] killing and offering of an animal to appease or maintain favour with a [[deity]]. It has been banned in [[India]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/02/india-court-bans-animal-sacrifice-hindu-temples |title=Indian court bans animal sacrifice |last=France-Presse |first=Agence}}</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|Religion|Spirituality}}
{{div col|2}}
* [[Belief]]
* [[Cult (religious practice)]]
* [[Index of religion-related articles]]
* [[Life stance]]
* [[List of foods with religious symbolism]]
* [[List of religious populations]]
* [[List of religious texts]]
* [[Morality and religion]]
* [[Nontheistic religions]]
* [[Outline of religion]]
* [[Philosophy of religion]]
* [[Priest]]
* [[Religion and happiness]]
* [[Religion and peacebuilding]]
* [[Religions by country]]
* [[Religious conversion]]
* [[Secularization]]
* [[Sociology of religion]]
* [[Temple]]
* [[Theocracy]]
* [[Timeline of religion]]
{{div col end}}

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group=note|2}}

==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}

==Sources==
{{refbegin}}
;Primary
* Saint Augustine; ''The Confessions of Saint Augustine'' (John K. Ryan translator); Image (1960), ISBN 0-385-02955-1.
* Lao Tzu; ''Tao Te Ching'' (Victor H. Mair translator); Bantam (1998).
* ''The Holy Bible'', King James Version; New American Library (1974).
* ''The Koran''; Penguin (2000), ISBN 0-14-044558-7.
* ''The Origin of Live & Death'', African Creation Myths; Heinemann (1966).
* ''Poems of Heaven and Hell from Ancient Mesopotamia''; Penguin (1971).
* ''Selected Work'' Marcus Tullius Cicero
* United States Constitution

;Secondary
* Barzilai, Gad; ''Law and Religion''; The International Library of Essays in Law and Society; Ashgate (2007), ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3
* {{Citation |last1=Borg |first1=J. |year=1965 |title=The Serotonin System and Spiritual Experiences |journal=American Journal of Psychiatry |volume=160 |pages=1965–1969 |date=November 2003 |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14594742 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Brodd |first=Jefferey |title=World Religions |publisher=Saint Mary's Press |year=2003 |location=Winona, MN |pages= |url= |doi= |isbn=978-0-88489-725-5}}
* Yves Coppens, ''Origines de l'homme - De la matière à la conscience'', De Vive Voix, Paris, 2010
* Yves Coppens, ''La preistoria dell'uomo'', Jaka Book, Milano, 2011
* Descartes, René; ''Meditations on First Philosophy''; Bobbs-Merril (1960), ISBN 0-672-60191-5.
* Dow, James W. (2007), ''[http://www.anpere.net/2007/2.pdf A Scientific Definition of Religion]''
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''Our Oriental Heritage''; MJF Books (1997), ISBN 1-56731-012-5.
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''Caesar and Christ''; MJF Books (1994), ISBN 1-56731-014-1
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''The Age of Faith''; Simon & Schuster (1980), ISBN 0-671-01200-2.
* [[Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, Emile]] (1976) ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life.'' London: George Allen & Unwin (in French 1912, English translation 1915)
* [[Clifford Geertz|Geertz, Clifford]]. 1993 [1966]. {{Wayback |df=yes|date=20070925190332 |url=http://resources.theology.ox.ac.uk/library/data/pdf/THD0111.pdf |title=''Religion as a cultural system''}}. pp.&nbsp;87–125 in Clifford Geertz, ''[https://books.google.com/books?hl=it&lr=&id=BZ1BmKEHti0C The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays]''. London: Fontana Press.
* [[Marija Gimbutas]] 1989. ''The Language of the Goddess''. Thames and Hudson New York
* Gonick, Larry; ''The Cartoon History of the Universe''; Doubleday, vol. 1 (1978) ISBN 0-385-26520-4, vol. II (1994) ISBN 0-385-42093-5, W. W. Norton, vol. III (2002) ISBN 0-393-05184-6.
* Haisch, Bernard ''The God Theory: Universes, Zero-point Fields, and What's Behind It All''—discussion of science vs. religion ([http://www.thegodtheory.com/preface.html Preface]{{Dead link|date=January 2011}}), Red Wheel/Weiser, 2006, ISBN 1-57863-374-5
* Khanbaghi, A., ''The Fire, the Star and the Cross: Minority Religions in Medieval and Early Modern Iran'' (IB Tauris; 2006) 268 pages. Social, political and cultural history of religious minorities in Iran, c. 226-1722 AD.
* King, Winston, ''Religion'' [First Edition]. In: ''Encyclopedia of Religion''. Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 11. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p7692-7701.
* [[Andrey Korotayev|Korotayev, Andrey]], ''World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective'', Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.
* {{Cite journal |last2=Harvey |first2=John |last3=Nyborg |first3=Helmuth |last=Lynn |first=Richard |authorlink=Richard Lynn |year=2009 |title=Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations |journal=[[Intelligence (journal)|Intelligence]] |volume=37 |pages=11–15 |url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000238 |doi=10.1016/j.intell.2008.03.004 |accessdate=25 May 2015 |ref=harv}}
* McKinnon, Andrew M. (2002), [http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/3073/1/McKinnon_Definition_of_Religion_author_version_no_format.pdf "Sociological Definitions, Language Games and the 'Essence' of Religion"]. Method & theory in the study of religion, vol 14, no. 1, pp.&nbsp;61–83.
* Marx, Karl; "Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right", ''Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher'', (1844).
* Palmer, Spencer J., ''et al''. ''Religions of the World: a Latter-day Saint [Mormon] View''. 2nd general ed., tev. and enl. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1997. xv, 294 p., ill. ISBN 0-8425-2350-2
* {{Citation |last=Pals |first=Daniel L. |year=2006 |title=Eight Theories of Religion |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
* Ramsay, Michael, ''Abp.'' ''Beyond Religion?'' Cincinnati, Ohio: Forward Movement Publications, (cop. 1964).
* Saler, Benson; "Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories" (1990), ISBN 1-57181-219-9
* Schuon, Frithjof. ''The Transcendent Unity of Religions'', in series, ''Quest Books.'' 2nd Quest ... rev. ed. Wheaton, Ill.: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993, cop. 1984. xxxiv, 173 p. ISBN 0-8356-0587-6
* [[Wilfred Cantwell Smith|Smith, Wilfred Cantwell]] (1962), ''The Meaning and End of Religion''
* {{Citation |last=Stausberg |first=Michael |year=2009 |title=Contemporary Theories of religion |publisher=Routledge}}
* [[Anthony F. C. Wallace|Wallace, Anthony F. C.]] 1966. ''Religion: An Anthropological View''. New York: Random House. (p.&nbsp;62-66)
* ''The World Almanac'' (annual), World Almanac Books, ISBN 0-88687-964-7.
* ''The World Almanac'' (for numbers of adherents of various religions), 2005
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
* {{Cite book |last1=James |first1=Paul |last2=Mandaville |first2=Peter |year=2010 |lastauthoramp=yes |title=Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions |url=https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010 |publisher=Sage Publications |location=London}}
* Noss, John B.; ''Man's Religions'', 6th ed.; Macmillan Publishing Co. (1980). ''N.B''.: The first ed. appeared in 1949, ISBN 0-02-388430-4.

==External links==
{{Commons category|Religion}}
{{Wikiquote|Religion}}
* [http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/govpubs/us/religion.htm Religion Statistics] from ''UCB Libraries GovPubs''
* {{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality}}
* [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents] by Adherents.com August 2005
* [http://www.iacsr.com/ IACSR - International Association for the Cognitive Science of Religion]
* [http://www.as.ua.edu/rel/studyingreligion.html Studying Religion] – Introduction to the methods and scholars of the academic study of religion
* [http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm#05 A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right] – Marx's original reference to religion as the ''opium of the people''.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120215004018/http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss16/gunn.shtml The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of "Religion" in International Law] Harvard Human Rights Journal article from the President and Fellows of Harvard College(2003)
* [http://www.sociologyofreligion.net/ Sociology of Religion Resources]
* [http://www.businessinsider.com/map-shows-how-religion-spread-around-the-world-2015-6 Video: 5 Religions spreading across the world]

{{Religion topics|state=expanded}}
{{philosophy of religion}}
{{Philosophy topics}}

{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Religion| ]]
[[Category:Culture]]

11:37, 19 Հուլիսի 2016-ի տարբերակ

Կաղապար:Use dmy dates Կաղապար:Photomontage Կաղապար:Religion by Country Կաղապար:Spirituality sidebar

Religion is a cultural system of behaviors and practices, world views, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and societal organisation that relate humanity to what an anthropologist has called "an order of existence".[1] Different religions may or may not contain various elements, ranging from the "divine",[2] "sacred things",[3] "faith",[4] a "supernatural being or supernatural beings"[5] or "...some sort of ultimacy and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life."[6]

Religious practices may include rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration (of God or deities), sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trances, initiations, funerary services, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, art, dance, public service, or other aspects of human culture. Religions have sacred histories and narratives, which may be preserved in sacred scriptures, and symbols and holy places, that aim mostly to give a meaning to life. Religions may contain symbolic stories, which are sometimes said by followers to be true, that have the side purpose of explaining the origin of life, the Universe, and other things. Traditionally, faith, in addition to reason, has been considered a source of religious beliefs.[7] There are an estimated 10,000 distinct religions worldwide.[8] About 84% of the world's population is affiliated with one of the five largest religions, namely Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism or forms of folk religion.[9]

With the onset of the modernisation of and the scientific revolution in the western world, some aspects of religion have cumulatively been criticized. Though the religiously unaffliated, including atheism (the rejection of belief in the existence of deities) and agnosticism (the belief that the truth of certain claims – especially metaphysical and religious claims such as whether God, the divine or the supernatural exist – are unknown and perhaps unknowable), have grown globally, many of the unaffiliated still have various religious beliefs.[10] About 16% of the world's population is religiously unaffiliated.[9]

The study of religion encompasses a wide variety of academic disciplines, including theology, comparative religion and social scientific studies. Theories of religion offer various explanations for the origins and workings of religion.

Etymology and history of the concept of Religion

Religion

Religion (from O.Fr. religion "religious community", from L. religionem (nom. religio) "respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods",[11] "obligation, the bond between man and the gods"[12]) is derived from the Latin religiō, the ultimate origins of which are obscure. One possible interpretation traced to Cicero, connects lego "read", i.e. re (again) with lego in the sense of "choose", "go over again" or "consider carefully". Modern scholars such as Tom Harpur and Joseph Campbell favor the derivation from ligare "bind, connect", probably from a prefixed re-ligare, i.e. re (again) + ligare or "to reconnect", which was made prominent by St. Augustine, following the interpretation of Lactantius.[13][14] The medieval usage alternates with order in designating bonded communities like those of monastic orders: "we hear of the 'religion' of the Golden Fleece, of a knight 'of the religion of Avys'".[15]

In the ancient and medieval world, the etymological Latin root religio was understood as an individual virtue of worship, never as doctrine, practice, or actual source of knowledge.[16] The modern concept of "religion" as an abstraction which entails distinct sets of beliefs or doctrines is a recent invention in the English language since such usage began with texts from the 17th century due to the splitting of Christendom during the Protestant Reformation and more prevalent colonization or globalization in the age of exploration which involved contact with numerous foreign and indigenous cultures with non-European languages.[16] It was in the 17th century that the concept of "religion" received its modern shape despite the fact that ancient texts like the Bible, the Quran, and other ancient sacred texts did not have a concept of religion in the original languages and neither did the people or the cultures in which these sacred texts were written.[17] For example, the Greek word threskeia, which was used by Greek writers such as Herodotus and Josephus and is found in texts like the New Testament, is sometimes translated as "religion" today, however, the term was understood as "worship" well into the medieval period.[17] In the Quran, the Arabic word din is often translated as "religion" in modern translations, but up to the mid-1600s translators expressed din as "law".[17] Even in the 1st century AD, Josephus had used the Greek term ioudaismos, which some translate as "Judaism" today, even though he used it as an ethnic term, not one linked to modern abstract concepts of religion as a set of beliefs.[17] It was in the 19th century that the terms "Buddhism", "Hinduism", "Taoism", and "Confucianism" first emerged.[16][18] Throughout its long history, Japan had no concept of "religion" since there was no corresponding Japanese word, nor anything close to its meaning, but when American warships appeared off the coast of Japan in 1853 and forced the Japanese government to sign treaties demanding, among other things, freedom of religion, the country had to contend with this Western idea.[18]

According to the philologist Max Müller in the 19th century, the root of the English word "religion", the Latin religio, was originally used to mean only "reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety" (which Cicero further derived to mean "diligence").[19][20] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What is called ancient religion today, they would have only called "law".[21]

Some languages have words that can be translated as "religion", but they may use them in a very different way, and some have no word for religion at all. For example, the Sanskrit word dharma, sometimes translated as "religion", also means law. Throughout classical South Asia, the study of law consisted of concepts such as penance through piety and ceremonial as well as practical traditions. Medieval Japan at first had a similar union between "imperial law" and universal or "Buddha law", but these later became independent sources of power.[22][23]

There is no precise equivalent of "religion" in Hebrew, and Judaism does not distinguish clearly between religious, national, racial, or ethnic identities.[24] One of its central concepts is "halakha", meaning the "walk" or "path" sometimes translated as "law", which guides religious practice and belief and many aspects of daily life.[25]

Faith

The word religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or set of duties;[26] however, in the words of Émile Durkheim, religion differs from private belief in that it is "something eminently social".[27]

Other terms

The use of other terms, such as obedience to God or Islam are likewise grounded in particular histories and vocabularies.[28]

Definitions

Religion as modern western construct

An increasing number of scholars have expressed reservations about ever defining the "essence" of religion.[29] They observe that the way we use the concept today is a particularly modern construct that would not have been understood through much of history and in many cultures outside the West (or even in the West until after the Peace of Westphalia).[30] The MacMIllan Encyclopedia of Religions states:

The very attempt to define religion, to find some distinctive or possibly unique essence or set of qualities that distinguish the "religious" from the remainder of human life, is primarily a Western concern. The attempt is a natural consequence of the Western speculative, intellectualistic, and scientific disposition. It is also the product of the dominant Western religious mode, what is called the Judeo-Christian climate or, more accurately, the theistic inheritance from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The theistic form of belief in this tradition, even when downgraded culturally, is formative of the dichotomous Western view of religion. That is, the basic structure of theism is essentially a distinction between a transcendent deity and all else, between the creator and his creation, between God and man.[31]

Classical definitions

Urarina shaman, Peru, 1988

Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as "a feeling of absolute dependence".[32]

His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as "the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit."[33]

Edward Burnett Tylor defined religion in 1871 as "the belief in spiritual beings".[34] He argued that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or idolatry and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious, and thus "has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them". He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.

In his book The Varieties of Religious Experience, the psychologist William James defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine".[2] By the term "divine" James meant "any object that is godlike, whether it be a concrete deity or not"[35] to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.[36]

The sociologist Durkheim, in his seminal book The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, defined religion as a "unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things".[3] By sacred things he meant things "set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them". Sacred things are not, however, limited to gods or spirits.[note 1] On the contrary, a sacred thing can be "a rock, a tree, a spring, a pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred".[37] Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and powers which are attributed to them.[38]

Echoes of James' and Durkheim's definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, Frederick Ferré who defined religion as "one's way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively".[39] Similarly, for the theologian Paul Tillich, faith is "the state of being ultimately concerned",[4] which "is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life."[40]

When religion is seen in terms of "sacred", "divine", intensive "valuing", or "ultimate concern", then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g. Richard Dawkins) do not necessarily disturb its adherents.[41]

Modern definitions

The anthropologist Clifford Geertz defined religion as a

...system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic."[1]

Alluding perhaps to Tylor's "deeper motive", Geertz remarked that

...we have very little idea of how, in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate it".[42]

The theologian Antoine Vergote took the term "supernatural" simply to mean whatever transcends the powers of nature or human agency. He also emphasized the "cultural reality" of religion, which he defined as

...the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings.[5]

Peter Mandaville and Paul James intended to get away from the modernist dualisms or dichotomous understandings of immanence/transcendence, spirituality/materialism, and sacredness/secularity. They define religion as

...a relatively-bounded system of beliefs, symbols and practices that addresses the nature of existence, and in which communion with others and Otherness is lived as if it both takes in and spiritually transcends socially-grounded ontologies of time, space, embodiment and knowing.[6]

According to the MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, there is an experiential aspect to religion which can be found in almost every culture:

..."almost every known culture [has] a depth dimension in cultural experiences [...] toward some sort of ultimacy and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life. When more or less distinct patterns of behavior are built around this depth dimension in a culture, this structure constitutes religion in its historically recognizable form. Religion is the organization of life around the depth dimensions of experience—varied in form, completeness, and clarity in accordance with the environing culture.[43]

Aspects

Կաղապար:Expand section A religion is a cultural system of behaviors and practices, world views, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and societal organisation that relate humanity to an order of existence.

Practices

The practices of a religion may include rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration (of a deity, gods, or goddesses), sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trances, initiations, funerary services, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, art, dance, public service, or other aspects of human culture.[44]

Worldview

Religions have sacred histories, narratives, and mythologies which may be preserved in sacred scriptures, and symbols and holy places, that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe.[փա՞ստ]

Religious beliefs

Traditionally, faith, in addition to reason, has been considered a source of religious beliefs. The interplay between faith and reason, and their use as actual or perceived support for religious beliefs, have been a subject of interest to philosophers and theologians.[7]

Mythology

The word myth has several meanings.

  1. A traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon;
  2. A person or thing having only an imaginary or unverifiable existence; or
  3. A metaphor for the spiritual potentiality in the human being.[45]

Ancient polytheistic religions, such as those of Greece, Rome, and Scandinavia, are usually categorized under the heading of mythology. Religions of pre-industrial peoples, or cultures in development, are similarly called "myths" in the anthropology of religion. The term "myth" can be used pejoratively by both religious and non-religious people. By defining another person's religious stories and beliefs as mythology, one implies that they are less real or true than one's own religious stories and beliefs. Joseph Campbell remarked, "Mythology is often thought of as other people's religions, and religion can be defined as mis-interpreted mythology."[46]

In sociology, however, the term myth has a non-pejorative meaning. There, myth is defined as a story that is important for the group whether or not it is objectively or provably true.[47] Examples include the resurrection of their real-life founder Jesus, which, to Christians, explains the means by which they are freed from sin, is symbolic of the power of life over death, and is also said to be a historical event. But from a mythological outlook, whether or not the event actually occurred is unimportant. Instead, the symbolism of the death of an old "life" and the start of a new "life" is what is most significant. Religious believers may or may not accept such symbolic interpretations.

Social organisation

Religions have a societal basis, either as a living tradition which is carried by lay participants, or with an organized clergy, and a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership.

Types and demographics

The list of still-active religious movements given here is an attempt to summarize the most important regional and philosophical influences on local communities, but it is by no means a complete description of every religious community, nor does it explain the most important elements of individual religiousness.

Types of religion

A map of major denominations and religions of the world

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the academic practice of comparative religion divided religious belief into philosophically defined categories called "world religions." Some academics studying the subject have divided religions into three broad categories:

  1. world religions, a term which refers to transcultural, international faiths;
  2. indigenous religions, which refers to smaller, culture-specific or nation-specific religious groups; and
  3. new religious movements, which refers to recently developed faiths.[48]

Some recent scholarship has argued that not all types of religion are necessarily separated by mutually exclusive philosophies, and furthermore that the utility of ascribing a practice to a certain philosophy, or even calling a given practice religious, rather than cultural, political, or social in nature, is limited.[49][50][51] The current state of psychological study about the nature of religiousness suggests that it is better to refer to religion as a largely invariant phenomenon that should be distinguished from cultural norms (i.e. "religions").[52]

Some scholars classify religions as either universal religions that seek worldwide acceptance and actively look for new converts, or ethnic religions that are identified with a particular ethnic group and do not seek converts.[53] Others reject the distinction, pointing out that all religious practices, whatever their philosophical origin, are ethnic because they come from a particular culture.[54][55][56]

Demographics

The five largest religious groups by world population, estimated to account for 5.8 billion people and 84% of the population, are Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism (with the relative numbers for Buddhism and Hinduism dependent on the extent of syncretism) and traditional folk religion.

Five largest religions 2010 (billion)[9] 2010 (%) 2000 (billion)[57][58] 2000 (%) Demographics
Christianity 2.2 32% 2.0 33% Christianity by country
Islam 1.6 23% 1.2 19.6% Islam by country
Hinduism 1.0 15% 0.811 13.4% Hinduism by country
Buddhism 0.5 7% 0.360 5.9% Buddhism by country
Folk religion 0.4 6% 0.385 6.4%
Total 5.8 84% 4.8 78.3%

A global poll in 2012 surveyed 57 countries and reported that 59% of the world's population identified as religious, 23% as not religious, 13% as "convinced atheists", and also a 9% decrease in identification as "religious" when compared to the 2005 average from 39 countries.[59] A follow up poll in 2015 found that 63% of the globe identified as religious, 22% as not religious, and 11% as "convinced atheists".[60] On average, women are "more religious" than men.[61] Some people follow multiple religions or multiple religious principles at the same time, regardless of whether or not the religious principles they follow traditionally allow for syncretism.[62][63][64]

Abrahamic

The patriarch Abraham (by József Molnár)

Abrahamic religions are monotheistic religions which believe they descend from Abraham.

Judaism

The Torah is the primary sacred text of Judaism.

Judaism is the oldest Abrahamic religion, originating in the people of ancient Israel and Judea. The Torah is its foundational text, and is part of the larger text known as the Tanakh or Hebrew Bible. It is supplemented by oral tradition, set down in written form in later texts such as the Midrash and the Talmud. Judaism includes a wide corpus of texts, practices, theological positions, and forms of organization. Within Judaism there are a variety of movements, most of which emerged from Rabbinic Judaism, which holds that God revealed his laws and commandments to Moses on Mount Sinai in the form of both the Written and Oral Torah; historically, this assertion was challenged by various groups. The Jewish people were scattered after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 CE. Today there are about 13 million Jews, about 40 per cent living in Israel and 40 per cent in the United States.[65] The largest Jewish religious movements are Orthodox Judaism (Haredi Judaism and Modern Orthodox Judaism), Conservative Judaism and Reform Judaism.

Christianity

Jesus is the central figure of Christianity.

Christianity is based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (1st century) as presented in the New Testament. The Christian faith is essentially faith in Jesus as the Christ, the Son of God, and as Savior and Lord. Almost all Christians believe in the Trinity, which teaches the unity of Father, Son (Jesus Christ), and Holy Spirit as three persons in one Godhead. Most Christians can describe their faith with the Nicene Creed. As the religion of Byzantine Empire in the first millennium and of Western Europe during the time of colonization, Christianity has been propagated throughout the world. The main divisions of Christianity are, according to the number of adherents:

There are also smaller groups, including:

Islam

Muslims circumambulating the Kaaba, the most sacred site in Islam

Islam is based on the Quran, one of the holy books considered by Muslims to be revealed by God, and on the teachings (hadith) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, a major political and religious figure of the 7th century CE. Islam is the most widely practiced religion of Southeast Asia, North Africa, Western Asia, and Central Asia, while Muslim-majority countries also exist in parts of South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Southeast Europe. There are also several Islamic republics, including Iran, Pakistan, Mauritania, and Afghanistan.

  • Sunni Islam is the largest denomination within Islam and follows the Quran, the hadiths which record the sunnah, whilst placing emphasis on the sahabah.
  • Shia Islam is the second largest denomination of Islam and its adherents believe that Ali succeeded Muhammad and further places emphasis on Muhammad's family.
  • Ahmadiyya adherents believe that the awaited Imam Mahdi and the Promised Messiah has arrived, believed to be Mirza Ghulam Ahmad by Ahmadis.
  • There are also Muslim revivalist movements such as Muwahhidism and Salafism.

Other denominations of Islam include Nation of Islam, Ibadi, Sufism, Quranism, Mahdavia, and non-denominational Muslims. Wahhabism is the dominant Muslim schools of thought in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Other

The Bahá'í Faith is an Abrahamic religion founded in 19th century Iran and since then has spread worldwide. It teaches unity of all religious philosophies and accepts all of the prophets of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as additional prophets including its founder Bahá'u'lláh. One of its divisions is the Orthodox Bahá'í Faith.

Smaller regional Abrahamic groups also exist, including Samaritanism (primarily in Israel and the West Bank), the Rastafari movement (primarily in Jamaica), and Druze (primarily in Syria and Lebanon).

East Asian religions

East Asian religions (also known as Far Eastern religions or Taoic religions) consist of several religions of East Asia which make use of the concept of Tao (in Chinese) or Dō (in Japanese or Korean). They include:

Indian religions

Hindu statue of Lord Rama in Kalaram Temple (India)
The Buddha, in a Sanskrit manuscript, Nālandā, Bihar, India

Indian religions are practiced or were founded in the Indian subcontinent. They are sometimes classified as the dharmic religions, as they all feature dharma, the specific law of reality and duties expected according to the religion.[66]

Hinduism is a synecdoche describing the similar philosophies of Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and related groups practiced or founded in the Indian subcontinent. Concepts most of them share in common include karma, caste, reincarnation, mantras, yantras, and darśana.[note 2] Hinduism is the most ancient of still-active religions,[67][68] with origins perhaps as far back as prehistoric times.[69] Hinduism is not a monolithic religion but a religious category containing dozens of separate philosophies amalgamated as Sanātana Dharma, which is the name by which Hinduism has been known throughout history by its followers.

Jainism, taught primarily by Parsva (9th century BCE) and Mahavira (6th century BCE), is an ancient Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence for all forms of living beings in this world. Jains are found mostly in India.

Buddhism was founded by Siddhattha Gotama in the 6th century BCE. Buddhists generally agree that Gotama aimed to help sentient beings end their suffering (dukkha) by understanding the true nature of phenomena, thereby escaping the cycle of suffering and rebirth (saṃsāra), that is, achieving nirvana.

Fresco of Guru Nanak at Goindwal Sahib Gurdwara

Sikhism is a monotheistic religion founded on the teachings of Guru Nanak and ten successive Sikh gurus in 15th century Punjab. It is the fifth-largest organized religion in the world, with approximately 30 million Sikhs.[73][74] Sikhs are expected to embody the qualities of a Sant-Sipāhī—a saint-soldier, have control over one's internal vices and be able to be constantly immersed in virtues clarified in the Guru Granth Sahib. The principal beliefs of Sikhi are faith in Waheguru—represented by the phrase ik ōaṅkār, meaning one God, who prevails in everything, along with a praxis in which the Sikh is enjoined to engage in social reform through the pursuit of justice for all human beings.

Local religions

Indigenous and folk

Incense burner in China

Indigenous religions or folk religions refers to a broad category of traditional religions that can be characterised by shamanism, animism and ancestor worship, where traditional means "indigenous, that which is aboriginal or foundational, handed down from generation to generation…".[75] These are religions that are closely associated with a particular group of people, ethnicity or tribe; they often have no formal creeds or sacred texts.[76] Some faiths are syncretic, fusing diverse religious beliefs and practices.[77]

Folk religions are often omitted as a category in surveys even in countries where they are widely practiced, e.g. in China.[76]

African traditional

Shango, the Orisha (god) of fire, lightning, and thunder, in the Yoruba religion, depicted on horseback

African traditional religion encompasses the traditional religious beliefs of people in Africa. In north Africa, these religions have included traditional Berber religion, ancient Egyptian religion, and Waaq. West African religions include Akan religion, Dahomey (Fon) mythology, Efik mythology, Odinani of the Igbo people, Serer religion, and Yoruba religion, while Bushongo mythology, Mbuti (Pygmy) mythology, Lugbara mythology, Dinka religion, and Lotuko mythology come from central Africa. Southern African traditions include Akamba mythology, Masai mythology, Malagasy mythology, San religion, Lozi mythology, Tumbuka mythology, and Zulu mythology. Bantu mythology is found throughout central, southeast, and southern Africa.

There are also notable African diasporic religions practiced in the Americas, such as Santeria, Candomble, Vodun, Lucumi, Umbanda, and Macumba.

Iranian

Zoroastrian Fire Temple

Iranian religions are ancient religions whose roots predate the Islamization of Greater Iran. Nowadays these religions are practiced only by minorities.

Zoroastrianism is based on the teachings of prophet Zoroaster in the 6th century BC. Zoroastrians worship the creator Ahura Mazda. In Zoroastrianism good and evil have distinct sources, with evil trying to destroy the creation of Mazda, and good trying to sustain it.

Mandaeism is a monotheistic religion with a strongly dualistic worldview. Mandaeans are sometime labeled as the "Last Gnostics".

Kurdish religions include the traditional beliefs of the Yazidi, Alevi, and Ahl-e Haqq. Sometimes these are labeled Yazdânism.

New religious movements

  • Shinshūkyō is a general category for a wide variety of religious movements founded in Japan since the 19th century. These movements share almost nothing in common except the place of their founding. The largest religious movements centered in Japan include Soka Gakkai, Tenrikyo, and Seicho-No-Ie among hundreds of smaller groups.
  • Cao Đài is a syncretistic, monotheistic religion, established in Vietnam in 1926.
  • Raëlism is a new religious movement founded in 1974 teaching that humans were created by aliens. It is numerically the world's largest UFO religion.
  • Hindu reform movements, such as Ayyavazhi, Swaminarayan Faith and Ananda Marga, are examples of new religious movements within Indian religions.
  • Unitarian Universalism is a religion characterized by support for a "free and responsible search for truth and meaning", and has no accepted creed or theology.
  • Noahidism is a monotheistic ideology based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and on their traditional interpretations within Rabbinic Judaism.
  • Scientology teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature. Its method of spiritual rehabilitation is a type of counseling known as auditing, in which practitioners aim to consciously re-experience and understand painful or traumatic events and decisions in their past in order to free themselves of their limiting effects.
  • Eckankar is a pantheistic religion with the purpose of making God an everyday reality in one's life.
  • Wicca is a neo-pagan religion first popularised in 1954 by British civil servant Gerald Gardner, involving the worship of a God and Goddess.
  • Druidry is a religion promoting harmony with nature, and drawing on the practices of the druids.
  • Satanism is a broad category of religions that, for example, worship Satan as a deity (Theistic Satanism) or use "Satan" as a symbol of carnality and earthly values (LaVeyan Satanism).

Sociological classifications of religious movements suggest that within any given religious group, a community can resemble various types of structures, including "churches", "denominations", "sects", "cults", and "institutions".

Interfaith cooperation

Because religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse[փա՞ստ], many religious practitionersԿաղապար:Who have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue, cooperation, and religious peacebuilding. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which affirmed "universal values" and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian–Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.[փա՞ստ]

Recent interfaith initiatives include "A Common Word", launched in 2007 and focused on bringing Muslim and Christian leaders together,[78] the "C1 World Dialogue",[79] the "Common Ground" initiative between Islam and Buddhism,[80] and a United Nations sponsored "World Interfaith Harmony Week".[81][82]

Scientific study of religion

A number of disciplines study the phenomenon of religion: theology, comparative religion, history of religion, evolutionary origin of religions, anthropology of religion, psychology of religion, including neurosciences of religion and evolutionary psychology of religion, sociology of religion, and Law and Religion.

Daniel L. Pals mentions eight classical theories of religion, focusing on various aspects of religion: animism and magic, by E.B. Tylor and J.G. Frazer; the psycho-analytic approach of Sigmund Freud; and further Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Mircea Eliade, E.E. Evans-Pritchard, and Clifford Geertz.[83]

Michael Stausberg gives an overview of contemporary theories of religion, including cognitive and biological approaches.[84]

Comparative religion

Nicholas de Lange, Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at Cambridge University, says that

The comparative study of religions is an academic discipline which has been developed within Christian theology faculties, and it has a tendency to force widely differing phenomena into a kind of strait-jacket cut to a Christian pattern. The problem is not only that other 'religions' may have little or nothing to say about questions which are of burning importance for Christianity, but that they may not even see themselves as religions in precisely the same way in which Christianity sees itself as a religion.[85]

Theories of religion

Origins and development

The Yazılıkaya sanctuary in Turkey, with the twelve gods of the underworld

The origin of religion is uncertain. There are a number of theories regarding the subsequent origins of religious practices.

According to anthropologists John Monaghan and Peter Just, "Many of the great world religions appear to have begun as revitalization movements of some sort, as the vision of a charismatic prophet fires the imaginations of people seeking a more comprehensive answer to their problems than they feel is provided by everyday beliefs. Charismatic individuals have emerged at many times and places in the world. It seems that the key to long-term success – and many movements come and go with little long-term effect – has relatively little to do with the prophets, who appear with surprising regularity, but more to do with the development of a group of supporters who are able to institutionalize the movement."[86]

The development of religion has taken different forms in different cultures. Some religions place an emphasis on belief, while others emphasize practice. Some religions focus on the subjective experience of the religious individual, while others consider the activities of the religious community to be most important. Some religions claim to be universal, believing their laws and cosmology to be binding for everyone, while others are intended to be practiced only by a closely defined or localized group. In many places religion has been associated with public institutions such as education, hospitals, the family, government, and political hierarchies.[87]

Anthropologists John Monoghan and Peter Just state that, "it seems apparent that one thing religion or belief helps us do is deal with problems of human life that are significant, persistent, and intolerable. One important way in which religious beliefs accomplish this is by providing a set of ideas about how and why the world is put together that allows people to accommodate anxieties and deal with misfortune."[87]

Cultural system

While religion is difficult to define, one standard model of religion, used in religious studies courses, was proposed by Clifford Geertz, who simply called it a "cultural system".[88] A critique of Geertz's model by Talal Asad categorized religion as "an anthropological category".[89] Richard Niebuhr's (1894-1962) five-fold classification of the relationship between Christ and culture, however, indicates that religion and culture can be seen as two separate systems, though not without some interplay.[90]

Social constructionism

One modern academic theory of religion, social constructionism, says that religion is a modern concept that suggests all spiritual practice and worship follows a model similar to the Abrahamic religions as an orientation system that helps to interpret reality and define human beings.[91] Among the main proponents of this theory of religion are Daniel Dubuisson, Timothy Fitzgerald, Talal Asad, and Jason Ānanda Josephson. The social constructionists argue that religion is a modern concept that developed from Christianity and was then applied inappropriately to non-Western cultures.

Law

The study of law and religion is a relatively new field, with several thousand scholars involved in law schools, and academic departments including political science, religion, and history since 1980.[92] Scholars in the field are not only focused on strictly legal issues about religious freedom or non-establishment, but also study religions as they are qualified through judicial discourses or legal understanding of religious phenomena. Exponents look at canon law, natural law, and state law, often in a comparative perspective.[93][94] Specialists have explored themes in western history regarding Christianity and justice and mercy, rule and equity, and discipline and love.[95] Common topics of interest include marriage and the family[96] and human rights.[97] Outside of Christianity, scholars have looked at law and religion links in the Muslim Middle East[98] and pagan Rome.[99]

Studies have focused on secularization.[100][101] In particular the issue of wearing religious symbols in public, such as headscarves that are banned in French schools, have received scholarly attention in the context of human rights and feminism.[102]

Reason and science

Science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence; and religions include revelation, faith and sacredness whilst also acknowledging philosophical and metaphysical explanations with regard to the study of the universe. Both science and religion are not monolithic, timeless, or static because both are complex social and cultural endeavors that have changed through time across languages and cultures.[103]

The concepts of "science" and "religion" are a recent invention: "religion" emerged in the 17th century in the midst of colonization and globalization and the Protestant Reformation,[16][17] "science" emerged in the 19th century in the midst of attempts to narrowly define those who studied nature,[16][104][105] and the phrase "religion and science" emerged in the 19th century due to the reification of both concepts.[16] It was in the 19th century that the terms "Buddhism", "Hinduism", "Taoism", and "Confucianism" first emerged.[16] In the ancient and medieval world, the etymological Latin roots of both science (scientia) and religion (religio) were understood as inner qualities of the individual or virtues, never as doctrines, practices, or actual sources of knowledge.[16]

In general the scientific method gains knowledge by testing hypotheses to develop theories through elucidation of facts or evaluation by experiments and thus only answers cosmological questions about the universe that can be observed and measured. It develops theories of the world which best fit physically observed evidence. All scientific knowledge is subject to later refinement, or even rejection, in the face of additional evidence. Scientific theories that have an overwhelming preponderance of favorable evidence are often treated as de facto verities in general parlance, such as the theories of general relativity and natural selection to explain respectively the mechanisms of gravity and evolution.

Religion does not have a method per se partly because religions emerge through time from diverse cultures and it is an attempt to find meaning in the world, and to explain humanity's place in it and relationship to it and to any posited entities. In terms of Christian theology and ultimate truths, people rely on reason, experience, scripture, and tradition to test and gauge what they experience and what they should believe. Furthermore, religious models, understanding, and metaphors are also revisable, as are scientific models.[106]

Regarding religion and science, Albert Einstein states (1940): "For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action; it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts…Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determine the goals, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up." [107]

Morality and Religion

Many religions have value frameworks regarding personal behavior meant to guide adherents in determining between right and wrong. These include the Triple Jems of Jainism, Judaism's Halacha, Islam's Sharia, Catholicism's Canon Law, Buddhism's Eightfold Path, and Zoroastrianism's "good thoughts, good words, and good deeds" concept, among others.[108] Religion and morality are not synonymous. Morality does not necessarily depend upon religion although this is "an almost automatic assumption."[109] According to The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics, religion and morality "are to be defined differently and have no definitional connections with each other. Conceptually and in principle, morality and a religious value system are two distinct kinds of value systems or action guides."[110]

According to global research done by Gallup on people from 145 countries, adherents of all the major world religions who attended religious services in the past week have higher rates of generosity such as donating money, volunteering, and helping a stranger than do their coreligionists who did not attend services (non-attenders). Even for people who were nonreligious, those who said they attended religious services in the past week exhibited more generous behaviors.[111] Another global study by Gallup on people from 140 countries showed that highly religious people are more likely to help others in terms of donating money, volunteering, and helping strangers despite them having, on average, lower incomes than those who are less religious or nonreligious.[112]

A comprehensive study by Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.[113][114] The study revealed that forty percent of worship service attending Americans volunteer regularly to help the poor and elderly as opposed to 15% of Americans who never attend services.[113] Moreover, religious individuals are more likely than non-religious individuals to volunteer for school and youth programs (36% vs. 15%), a neighborhood or civic group (26% vs. 13%), and for health care (21% vs. 13%).[113] Other research has shown similar correlations between religiosity and giving.[115]

Religious belief appears to be the strongest predictor of charitable giving.[116][117][118][119][120] One study found that average charitable giving in 2000 by religious individuals ($2,210) was over three times that of secular individuals ($642). Giving to non-religious charities by religious individuals was $88 higher. Religious individuals are also more likely to volunteer time, donate blood, and give back money when accidentally given too much change.[118] A 2007 study by the The Barna Group found that "active-faith" individuals (those who had attended a church service in the past week) reported that they had given on average $1,500 in 2006, while "no-faith" individuals reported that they had given on average $200. "Active-faith" adults claimed to give twice as much to non-church-related charities as "no-faith" individuals claimed to give. They were also more likely to report that they were registered to vote, that they volunteered, that they personally helped someone who was homeless, and to describe themselves as "active in the community."[121]

Some scientific studies show that the degree of religiosity is generally found to be associated with higher ethical attitudes[122][123][124][125] — for example, surveys suggesting a positive connection between faith and altruism.[126] Survey research suggests that believers do tend to hold different views than non-believers on a variety of social, ethical and moral questions. According to a 2003 survey conducted in the United States by The Barna Group, those who described themselves as believers were less likely than those describing themselves as atheists or agnostics to consider the following behaviors morally acceptable: cohabitating with someone of the opposite sex outside of marriage, enjoying sexual fantasies, having an abortion, sexual relationships outside of marriage, gambling, looking at pictures of nudity or explicit sexual behavior, getting drunk, and "having a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex."[127]

Politics

Religion has a significant impact on the political system in many countries. Notably, most Muslim-majority countries adopt various aspects of sharia, the Islamic law. Some countries even define themselves in religious terms, such as The Islamic Republic of Iran. The sharia thus affects up to 23% of the global population, or 1.57 billion people who are Muslims. However, religion also affects political decisions in many western countries. For instance, in the United States, 51% of voters would be less likely to vote for a presidential candidate who did not believe in God, and only 6% more likely.[128] Christians make up 92% of members of the US Congress, compared with 71% of the general public (as of 2014). At the same time, while 23% of U.S. adults are religiously unaffiliated, only one member of Congress (Kyrsten Sinema, D-Arizona), or 0.2% of that body, claims no religious affiliation.[129] In most European countries, however, religion has a much smaller influence on politics[130] although it used to be much more important. For instance, same-sex marriage and abortion were illegal in many European countries until recently, following Christian (usually Catholic) doctrine. Several European leaders are atheists (e.g. France’s president Francois Hollande or Greece's prime minister Alexis Tsipras). In Asia, the role of religion differs widely between countries. For instance, India is still one of the most religious countries and religion still has a strong impact on politics, given that Hindu nationalists have been targeting minorities like the Muslims and the Christians, who historically belonged to the lower castes.[131] By contrast, countries such as China or Japan are largely secular and thus religion has a much smaller impact on politics.

Economics

Average income correlates negatively with (self-defined) religiosity.[59]

One study has found there is a negative correlation between self-defined religiosity and the wealth of nations.[132] In other words, the richer a nation is, the less likely its inhabitants to call themselves "religious", whatever this word means to them.[132]

Sociologist and political economist Max Weber has argued that Protestant Christian countries are wealthier because of their Protestant work ethic.[133]

According to a study from 2015, Christians hold the largest amount of wealth (55% of the total world wealth), followed by Muslims (5.8%), Hindus (3.3%) and Jewish (1.1%). According to the same study it was found that adherents under the classification Irreligion or other religions hold about 34.8% of the total global wealth.[134]

Health

Mayo Clinic researchers examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality, and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. The authors reported that: "Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide."[135]

The authors of a subsequent study concluded that the influence of religion on health is "largely beneficial", based on a review of related literature.[136] According to academic James W. Jones, several studies have discovered "positive correlations between religious belief and practice and mental and physical health and longevity." [137]

An analysis of data from the 1998 US General Social Survey, whilst broadly confirming that religious activity was associated with better health and well-being, also suggested that the role of different dimensions of spirituality/religiosity in health is rather more complicated. The results suggested "that it may not be appropriate to generalize findings about the relationship between spirituality/religiosity and health from one form of spirituality/religiosity to another, across denominations, or to assume effects are uniform for men and women.[138]

Superstition

Superstition has been described as "the incorrect establishment of cause and effect" or a false conception of causation.[139] Religion is more complex and is mostly composed of social institutions and morality. But some religions may include superstitions or make use of magical thinking. Adherents of one religion sometimes think of other religions as superstition.[140][141] Some atheists, deists, and skeptics regard religious belief as superstition.

Greek and Roman pagans, who saw their relations with the gods in political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods (deisidaimonia), as a slave might fear a cruel and capricious master. The Romans called such fear of the gods superstitio.[142]

Ancient greek historian Polybius described superstition in Ancient Rome as an instrumentum regni, an instrument of maintaining the cohesion of the Empire.[143]

The Roman Catholic Church considers superstition to be sinful in the sense that it denotes a lack of trust in the divine providence of God and, as such, is a violation of the first of the Ten Commandments. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that superstition "in some sense represents a perverse excess of religion" (para. #2110). "Superstition," it says, "is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. Matthew 23:16-22" (para. #2111)

Secularism and atheism

Ranjit Singh established secular rule over Punjab in the early 19th century.

Secularisation

Secularization is the transformation of a society from close identification with religious values and institutions toward nonreligious values and secular institutions. The term secularization is also used in the context of the lifting of the monastic restrictions from a member of the clergy.[144]

Agnosticism and Atheism

The terms "atheist" (lack of belief in any gods) and "agnostic" (belief in the unknowability of the existence of gods), though specifically contrary to theistic (e.g. Christian, Jewish, and Muslim) religious teachings, do not by definition mean the opposite of "religious". There are religions (including Buddhism, Taoism, and Hinduism), in fact, that classify some of their followers as agnostic, atheistic, or nontheistic. The true opposite of "religious" is the word "irreligious". Irreligion describes an absence of any religion; antireligion describes an active opposition or aversion toward religions in general.

Criticism of religious violence

Violence

The Crusades were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between Christian Europe and Muslims. Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade.

Critics like Hector Avalos[145] Regina Schwartz,[146] Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins have argued that religions are inherently violent and harm to society by using violence to promote their goals, in ways that are endorsed and exploited by their leaders.[147][Հղում աղբյուրներին][148][Հղում աղբյուրներին]

Anthropologist Jack David Eller asserts that religion is not inherently violent, arguing "religion and violence are clearly compatible, but they are not identical." He asserts that "violence is neither essential to nor exclusive to religion" and that " virtually every form of religious violence has its nonreligious corollary."[149][150]

Animal Sacrifice

Done by some (but not all) religions, animal sacrifice is the ritual killing and offering of an animal to appease or maintain favour with a deity. It has been banned in India.[151]

See also

Notes

  1. That is how, according to Durkheim, Buddhism is a religion. "In default of gods, Buddhism admits the existence of sacred things, namely, the four noble truths and the practices derived from them" (ibid, p. 45).
  2. Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition" etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Gavin Flood (2003), pp. 1-17. René Guénon in his Introduction to the Study of the Hindu doctrines (1921 ed.), Sophia Perennis, ISBN 0-900588-74-8, proposes a definition of the term "religion" and a discussion of its relevance (or lack of) to Hindu doctrines (part II, chapter 4, p. 58).

References

  1. 1,0 1,1 Geertz, C. (1993) Religion as a cultural system. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, Geertz, Clifford, pp.87-125. Fontana Press.
  2. 2,0 2,1 James, W. (1902) The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. Longmans, Green, and Co. (p. 31)
  3. 3,0 3,1 Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  4. 4,0 4,1 Tillich, P. (1957) Dynamics of faith. Harper Perennial; (p.1).
  5. 5,0 5,1 Vergote, A. (1996) Religion, belief and unbelief. A Psychological Study, Leuven University Press. (p. 16)
  6. 6,0 6,1 James, Paul; Mandaville, Peter (2010). Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions. London: Sage Publications. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (օգնություն)
  7. 7,0 7,1 Faith and Reason by James Swindal, http://www.iep.utm.edu/faith-re/
  8. Association, African Studies; Michigan, University of (2005). History in Africa (Volume 32 ed.). էջ 119.
  9. 9,0 9,1 9,2 «The Global Religious Landscape». Վերցված է 18 December 2012-ին.
  10. «Religiously Unaffiliated». The Global Religious Landscape. Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life. 18 December 2012.
  11. Harper, Douglas. «religion». Online Etymology Dictionary.
  12. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
  13. In The Pagan Christ: Recovering the Lost Light. Toronto. Thomas Allen, 2004. ISBN 0-88762-145-7
  14. In The Power of Myth, with Bill Moyers, ed. Betty Sue Flowers, New York, Anchor Books, 1991. ISBN 0-385-41886-8
  15. Johan Huizinga, The Waning of the Middle Ages (1919) 1924:75.
  16. 16,0 16,1 16,2 16,3 16,4 16,5 16,6 16,7 Harrison, Peter (2015). The Territories of Science and Religion. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 022618448X.
  17. 17,0 17,1 17,2 17,3 17,4 Nongbri, Brent (2013). Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. Yale University Press. ISBN 030015416X.
  18. 18,0 18,1 Josephson, Jason Ananda (2012). The Invention of Religion in Japan. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226412342.
  19. Max Müller, Natural Religion, p.33, 1889
  20. Lewis & Short, A Latin Dictionary
  21. Max Müller. Introduction to the science of religion. p. 28.
  22. Kuroda, Toshio and Jacqueline I. Stone, translator. "The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law" Wayback Machine-ի միջոցով: (archived 23 Մարտ 2003). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23.3-4 (1996)
  23. Neil McMullin. Buddhism and the State in Sixteenth-Century Japan. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1984.
  24. Hershel Edelheit, Abraham J. Edelheit, History of Zionism: A Handbook and Dictionary, p.3, citing Solomon Zeitlin, The Jews. Race, Nation, or Religion? ( Philadelphia: Dropsie College Press, 1936).
  25. Whiteford, Linda M.; Trotter II, Robert T. (2008). Ethics for Anthropological Research and Practice. Waveland Press. էջ 22. ISBN 978-1-4786-1059-5.
  26. Kant, Immanuel (2001). Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge University Press. էջ 177. ISBN 9780521799980.
  27. Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin, p.10.
  28. Colin Turner. Islam without Allah? New York: Routledge, 2000. pp. 11-12.
  29. McKinnon, AM. (2002). 'Sociological Definitions, Language Games and the "Essence" of Religion'. Method & theory in the study of religion, vol 14, no. 1, pp. 61–83. [1]
  30. Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1978). The Meaning and End of Religion New York: Harper and Row
  31. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, Religion, p.
  32. Hueston A. Finlay. "'Feeling of absolute dependence' or 'absolute feeling of dependence'? A question revisited". Religious Studies 41.1 (2005), pp.81-94.
  33. Max Müller. "Lectures on the origin and growth of religion."
  34. Tylor, E.B. (1871) Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Vol. 1. London: John Murray; (p.424).
  35. (ibid, p. 34)
  36. (ibid, p. 38)
  37. (ibid, p. 37)
  38. (ibid, pp. 40–41)
  39. Frederick Ferré, F. (1967) Basic modern philosophy of religion. Scribner, (p.82).
  40. Tillich, P. (1959) Theology of Culture. Oxford University Press; (p.8).
  41. Pecorino, P.A. (2001) Philosophy of Religion. Online Textbook. Philip A. Pecorino.
  42. (ibid, p. 90)
  43. MacMillan Encyclopedia of religions, Religion, p.7695
  44. Oxford Dictionaries mythology, retrieved 9 September 2012
  45. Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth, p. 22 ISBN 0-385-24774-5
  46. Joseph Campbell, Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor. Ed. Eugene Kennedy. New World Library ISBN 1-57731-202-3.
  47. «myth». Encyclopedia Britannica. Վերցված է 24 April 2016-ին.
  48. Harvey, Graham (2000). Indigenous Religions: A Companion. (Ed: Graham Harvey). London and New York: Cassell. Page 06.
  49. Brian Kemble Pennington Was Hinduism Invented? New York: Oxford University Press US, 2005. ISBN 0-19-516655-8
  50. Russell T. McCutcheon. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.
  51. Nicholas Lash. The beginning and the end of 'religion'. Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56635-5
  52. Joseph Bulbulia. "Are There Any Religions? An Evolutionary Explanation." Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 17.2 (2005), pp.71-100
  53. Hinnells, John R. (2005). The Routledge companion to the study of religion. Routledge. էջեր 439–440. ISBN 0-415-33311-3. Վերցված է 17 September 2009-ին.
  54. Timothy Fitzgerald. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press USA, 2000.
  55. Craig R. Prentiss. Religion and the Creation of Race and Ethnicity. New York: NYU Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8147-6701-X
  56. Tomoko Masuzawa. The Invention of World Religions, or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. ISBN 0-226-50988-5
  57. Turner, Darrell J. «Religion: Year In Review 2000». Encyclopedia Britannica. Վերցված է 16 June 2012-ին.
  58. but cf: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/#religions
  59. 59,0 59,1 «Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism» (PDF). WIN-Gallup International. 27 July 2012. Վերցված է 24 August 2012-ին.
  60. «Losing our Religion? Two Thirds of People Still Claim to be Religious» (PDF). WIN/Gallup International. WIN/Gallup International. 13 April 2015.
  61. «Women More Religious Than Men». Livescience.com. Վերցված է 14 July 2013-ին.
  62. Soul Searching:The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers - Page 77, Christian Smith, Melina Lundquist Denton - 2005
  63. Christ in Japanese Culture: Theological Themes in Shusaku Endo's Literary Works, Emi Mase-Hasegawa - 2008
  64. New poll reveals how churchgoers mix eastern new age beliefs retrieved 26 July 2013
  65. http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton61/st02_27.pdf
  66. Mittal, Sushil (2003). Surprising Bedfellows: Hindus and Muslims in Medieval and Early Modern India. Lexington Books. էջ 103. ISBN 9780739106730.
  67. P. 484 Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions By Wendy Doniger, M. Webster, Merriam-Webster, Inc
  68. P. 219 Faith, Religion & Theology By Brennan Hill, Paul F. Knitter, William Madges
  69. P. 6 The World's Great Religions By Yoshiaki Gurney Omura, Selwyn Gurney Champion, Dorothy Short
  70. Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony (2000), Buddhist Thought: A complete introduction to the Indian tradition, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-18593-5 p=194
  71. Smith, E. Gene (2001). Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature of the Himalayan Plateau. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-179-3
  72. Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary, ISBN 4-7674-2015-6
  73. «Sikhism: What do you know about it?». The Washington Post. Վերցված է 13 December 2012-ին.
  74. Zepps, Josh (6 August 2012). «Sikhs in America: What You Need To Know About The World's Fifth-Largest Religion». Huffington Post. Վերցված է 13 December 2012-ին.
  75. J. O. Awolalu (1976) What is African Traditional Religion? Studies in Comparative Religion Vol. 10, No. 2. (Spring, 1976).
  76. 76,0 76,1 Pew Research Center (2012) The Global Religious Landscape. A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups as of 2010. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
  77. Central Intelligence Agency. «Religions». World Factbook. Վերցված է 3 January 2013-ին.
  78. «A Common Word Between Us and You». acommonword.com.
  79. «konsoleH :: Login». c1worlddialogue.com.
  80. «Islam and Buddhism». islambuddhism.com.
  81. World Interfaith Harmony Week
  82. «» World Interfaith Harmony Week UNGA Resolution A/65/PV.34». worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com.
  83. Pals, 2006
  84. Stausberg, 2009
  85. Nicholas de Lange, Judaism, Oxford University Press, 1986
  86. Monaghan, John; Just, Peter (2000). Social & Cultural Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. էջ 126. ISBN 978-0-19-285346-2.
  87. 87,0 87,1 Monaghan, John; Just, Peter (2000). Social & Cultural Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. էջ 124. ISBN 978-0-19-285346-2.
  88. Clifford Geertz, Religion as a Cultural System, 1973
  89. Talal Asad, The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category, 1982.
  90. Richard Niebuhr, Christ and Culture (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1951) as cited by Domenic Marbaniang, "The Gospel and Culture: Areas of Conflict, Consent, and Conversion", Journal of Contemporary Christian Vol.6, No.1 (Bangalore: CFCC, Aug 2014), ISSN 2231-5233 pp.9-10
  91. Vergote, Antoine, Religion, belief and unbelief: a psychological study, Leuven University Press, 1997, p. 89
  92. Witte, John (2012). «The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report». Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 14 (3): 327–354. doi:10.1017/s0956618x12000348.
  93. Norman Doe, Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction (2011).
  94. W. Cole Durham and Brett G. Scharffs, eds., Law and religion: national, international, and comparative perspectives (Aspen Pub, 2010).
  95. John Witte Jr. and Frank S. Alexander, eds., Christianity and Law: An Introduction (Cambridge U.P. 2008)
  96. John Witte Jr., From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition (1997).
  97. John Witte, Jr., The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism (2008).
  98. Elizabeth Mayer, Ann (1987). «Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East». American Journal of Comparative Law. 35 (1): 127–184. JSTOR 840165.
  99. Alan Watson, The state, law, and religion: pagan Rome (University of Georgia Press, 1992).
  100. Ferrari, Silvio (2012). «Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective». Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 14 (3): 355–370. doi:10.1017/s0956618x1200035x.
  101. Palomino, Rafael (2012). «Legal dimensions of secularism: challenges and problems». Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice. 2: 208–225.
  102. Bennoune, Karima (2006). «Secularism and human rights: A contextual analysis of headscarves, religious expression, and women's equality under international law». Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 45: 367.
  103. Stenmark, Mikael (2004). How to Relate Science and Religion: A Multidimensional Model. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. ISBN 080282823X.
  104. Cahan, David, ed. (2003). From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226089282.
  105. Numbers, Ronald; Lindberg, David, eds. (2003). When Science and Christianity Meet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226482146.
  106. Tolman, Cynthia. «Methods in Religion». Malboro College.
  107. Einstein, Albert (21 September 1940). «Personal God Concept Causes Science-Religion Conflict». The Science News-Letter. 38 (12): 181–182. doi:10.2307/3916567. JSTOR 3916567.
  108. Esptein, Greg M. (2010). Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe. New York: HarperCollins. էջ 117. ISBN 978-0-06-167011-4.
  109. Rachels, (ed) James; Rachels, (ed) Stuart (2011). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (7 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-078-03824-3. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (օգնություն)
  110. Childress, (ed) James F.; Macquarrie, (ed) John (1986). The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press. էջ 401. ISBN 0-664-20940-8. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (օգնություն)
  111. Stark, Rodney; Smith, Buster G. (4 September 2009). «Religious Attendance Relates to Generosity Worldwide». Gallup.
  112. Crabtree, Steve; Pelham, Brett (8 October 2008). «Worldwide, Highly Religious More Likely to Help Others». Gallup.
  113. 113,0 113,1 113,2 «Religious citizens more involved -- and more scarce?». USA Today. «The scholars say their studies found that religious people are three to four times more likely to be involved in their community. They are more apt than nonreligious Americans to work on community projects, belong to voluntary associations, attend public meetings, vote in local elections, attend protest demonstrations and political rallies, and donate time and money to causes – including secular ones. At the same time, Putnam and Campbell say their data show that religious people are just "nicer": they carry packages for people, don't mind folks cutting ahead in line and give money to panhandlers.»
  114. Campbell, David; Putnam, Robert (14 November 2010). «Religious people are 'better neighbors'». USA Today. Վերցված է 18 October 2007-ին. «However, on the other side of the ledger, religious people are also "better neighbors" than their secular counterparts. No matter the civic activity, being more religious means being more involved. Take, for example, volunteer work. Compared with people who never attend worship services, those who attend weekly are more likely to volunteer in religious activities (no surprise there), but also for secular causes. The differences between religious and secular Americans can be dramatic. Forty percent of worship-attending Americans volunteer regularly to help the poor and elderly, compared with 15% of Americans who never attend services. Frequent-attenders are also more likely than the never-attenders to volunteer for school and youth programs (36% vs. 15%), a neighborhood or civic group (26% vs. 13%), and for health care (21% vs. 13%). The same is true for philanthropic giving; religious Americans give more money to secular causes than do secular Americans. And the list goes on, as it is true for good deeds such as helping someone find a job, donating blood, and spending time with someone who is feeling blue. Furthermore, the "religious edge" holds up for organized forms of community involvement: membership in organizations, working to solve community problems, attending local meetings, voting in local elections, and working for social or political reform. On this last point, it is not just that religious people are advocating for right-leaning causes, although many are. Religious liberals are actually more likely to be community activists than are religious conservatives.»
  115. Brooks, Arthur. «Religious Faith and Charitable Giving».
  116. Brooks, Arthur C. "Religious faith and charitable giving", Policy Review, Oct–Dec 2003.
  117. Will, George F. "Bleeding Hearts but Tight Fists", Washington Post, 27 March 2008; Page A17
  118. 118,0 118,1 Gose, Ben. "Charity's Political Divide", The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 23 November 2006.
  119. Brooks, Arthur C. Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth about Compassionate Conservatism, Basic Books, 27 November 2006. ISBN 0-465-00821-6
  120. Stossel, John; Kendall, Kristina (28 November 2006). «Who Gives and Who Doesn't? Putting the Stereotypes to the Test». ABC News.
  121. "Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians", The Barna Update, The Barna Group, 11 June 2007.
  122. Kerley, Kent R.; Matthews, Todd L.; Blanchard, Troy C. (2005). «Religiosity, Religious Participation, and Negative Prison Behaviors». Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 44 (4): 443–457. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00296.x.
  123. Saroglou, Vassilis; Pichon, Isabelle; Trompette, Laurence; Verschueren, Marijke; Dernelle, Rebecca (2005). «Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings». Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 44 (3): 323–348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x.
  124. Regnerus, Mark D.; Burdette, Amy (2006). «Religious Change and Adolescent Family Dynamics». The Sociological Quarterly. 47 (1): 175–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00042.x.
  125. Conroy, S. J.; Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). «Business Ethics and Religion: Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness Among Students». Journal of Business Ethics. 50 (4): 383–396. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025040.41263.09.
  126. e.g. a survey by Robert Putnam showing that membership of religious groups was positively correlated with membership of voluntary organizations
  127. "The Barna Update: Morality Continues to Decay" (archive copy at the Internet Archive), The Barna Group, 3 November 2003 ("The Barna Update: Morality Continues to Decay" – Summary version posted on the Barna website)
  128. The Economist explains: The role of religion in America’s presidential race, The Economist, 25 February 2016
  129. Lipka, Michael (27 Aug 2015). «10 facts about religion in America». Pew Research Center. Վերցված է 9 July 2016-ին.
  130. Europe, religion and politics:Old world wars, The Economist, 22 April 2014
  131. Lobo, L. 2000 Religion and Politics in India, America Magazine, 19 February 2000
  132. 132,0 132,1 WIN-Gallup. «Global Index of religion and atheism» (PDF). Վերցված է July 2016-ին.
  133. Max Weber, [1904] 1920. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
  134. «Christians hold largest percentage of global wealth: Report». deccanherald.com. 2015-01-14.
  135. Mueller, MD, Paul S.; Plevak, MD, David J.; Rummans, MD, Teresa A. «Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for Clinical Practice» (PDF). Վերցված է 13 November 2010-ին. «We reviewed published studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and subject reviews that examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. We also reviewed articles that provided suggestions on how clinicians might assess and support the spiritual needs of patients. Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide»
  136. Seybold, Kevin S.; Hill, Peter C. (Feb 2001). «The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Mental and Physical Health». Current Directions in Psychological Science. 10 (1): 21–24. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00106.
  137. Jones, James W. (2004). «Religion, Health, and the Psychology of Religion: How the Research on Religion and Health Helps Us Understand Religion». Journal of Religion and Health. 43 (4): 317–328. doi:10.1007/s10943-004-4299-3.
  138. Maselko, J. and Kubzansky, L. D. (2006) Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: Results from the US General Social Survey" Social Science & Medicine, Vol 62(11), June 2848-2860.
  139. Kevin R. Foster and Hanna Kokko, "The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour", Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 31–37 Արխիվացված է 28 Հուլիս 2010 Wayback Machine-ի միջոցով:
  140. Boyer (2001). «Why Belief». Religion Explained. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (օգնություն); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (օգնություն)
  141. Fitzgerald 2007, էջ. 232
  142. Veyne 1987, p 211 [պարզաբանել]
  143. Polybius, The Histories, VI 56.
  144. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/secularization
  145. Avalos, Hector (2005). Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
  146. The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism By Regina M. Schwartz. University of Chicago Press. 1998.
  147. Hitchens, Christopher (2007). God is not Great. Twelve.
  148. Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam Books.
  149. Eller, Jack David (2010). Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence: Religious Violence Across Culture and History. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-218-6. «As we have insisted previously, religion is not inherently and irredeemably violent; it certainly is not the essence and source of all violence.»
  150. Eller, Jack David (2010). Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence: Religious Violence Across Culture and History. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-61614-218-6. «Religion and violence are clearly compatible, but they are not identical. Violence is one phenomenon in human (and natural existence), religion is another, and it is inevitable that the two would become intertwined. Religion is complex and modular, and violence is one of the modules—not universal, but recurring. As a conceptual and behavioral module, violence is by no means exclusive to religion. There are plenty of other groups, institutions, interests, and ideologies to promote violence. Violence is, therefore, neither essential to nor exclusive to religion. Nor is religious violence all alike... And virtually every form of religious violence has its nonreligious corollary.»
  151. France-Presse, Agence. «Indian court bans animal sacrifice».

Sources

Primary
  • Saint Augustine; The Confessions of Saint Augustine (John K. Ryan translator); Image (1960), ISBN 0-385-02955-1.
  • Lao Tzu; Tao Te Ching (Victor H. Mair translator); Bantam (1998).
  • The Holy Bible, King James Version; New American Library (1974).
  • The Koran; Penguin (2000), ISBN 0-14-044558-7.
  • The Origin of Live & Death, African Creation Myths; Heinemann (1966).
  • Poems of Heaven and Hell from Ancient Mesopotamia; Penguin (1971).
  • Selected Work Marcus Tullius Cicero
  • United States Constitution
Secondary

), Red Wheel/Weiser, 2006, ISBN 1-57863-374-5

  • Khanbaghi, A., The Fire, the Star and the Cross: Minority Religions in Medieval and Early Modern Iran (IB Tauris; 2006) 268 pages. Social, political and cultural history of religious minorities in Iran, c. 226-1722 AD.
  • King, Winston, Religion [First Edition]. In: Encyclopedia of Religion. Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 11. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p7692-7701.
  • Korotayev, Andrey, World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.
  • Lynn, Richard; Harvey, John; Nyborg, Helmuth (2009). «Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations». Intelligence. 37: 11–15. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.03.004. Վերցված է 25 May 2015-ին. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (օգնություն)
  • McKinnon, Andrew M. (2002), "Sociological Definitions, Language Games and the 'Essence' of Religion". Method & theory in the study of religion, vol 14, no. 1, pp. 61–83.
  • Marx, Karl; "Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right", Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, (1844).
  • Palmer, Spencer J., et al. Religions of the World: a Latter-day Saint [Mormon] View. 2nd general ed., tev. and enl. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1997. xv, 294 p., ill. ISBN 0-8425-2350-2
  • Pals, Daniel L. (2006), Eight Theories of Religion, Oxford University Press
  • Ramsay, Michael, Abp. Beyond Religion? Cincinnati, Ohio: Forward Movement Publications, (cop. 1964).
  • Saler, Benson; "Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories" (1990), ISBN 1-57181-219-9
  • Schuon, Frithjof. The Transcendent Unity of Religions, in series, Quest Books. 2nd Quest ... rev. ed. Wheaton, Ill.: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993, cop. 1984. xxxiv, 173 p. ISBN 0-8356-0587-6
  • Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1962), The Meaning and End of Religion
  • Stausberg, Michael (2009), Contemporary Theories of religion, Routledge
  • Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1966. Religion: An Anthropological View. New York: Random House. (p. 62-66)
  • The World Almanac (annual), World Almanac Books, ISBN 0-88687-964-7.
  • The World Almanac (for numbers of adherents of various religions), 2005

Further reading

Վիքիքաղվածքն ունի քաղվածքների հավաքածու, որոնք վերաբերում են

Կաղապար:Religion topics Կաղապար:Philosophy of religion Կաղապար:Philosophy topics